• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在干旱条件下,土壤质地而非根毛主导着水分吸收和土壤-植物水力学。

Soil textures rather than root hairs dominate water uptake and soil-plant hydraulics under drought.

机构信息

Chair of Soil Physics, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, 95447, Germany.

Biogeochemistry of Agroecosystems, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.

出版信息

Plant Physiol. 2021 Oct 5;187(2):858-872. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab271.

DOI:10.1093/plphys/kiab271
PMID:34608949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8491061/
Abstract

Although the role of root hairs (RHs) in nutrient uptake is well documented, their role in water uptake and drought tolerance remains controversial. Maize (Zea mays) wild-type and its hair-defective mutant (Mut; roothairless 3) were grown in two contrasting soil textures (sand and loam). We used a root pressure chamber to measure the relation between transpiration rate (E) and leaf xylem water potential (ψleaf_x) during soil drying. Our hypotheses were: (1) RHs extend root-soil contact and reduce the ψleaf_x decline at high E in dry soils; (2) the impact of RHs is more pronounced in sand; and (3) Muts partly compensate for lacking RHs by producing longer and/or thicker roots. The ψleaf_x(E) relation was linear in wet conditions and became nonlinear as the soils dried. This nonlinearity occurred more abruptly and at less negative matric potentials in sand (ca. -10 kPa) than in loam (ca. -100 kPa). At more negative soil matric potentials, soil hydraulic conductance became smaller than root hydraulic conductance in both soils. Both genotypes exhibited 1.7 times longer roots in loam, but 1.6 times thicker roots in sand. No differences were observed in the ψleaf_x(E) relation and active root length between the two genotypes. In maize, RHs had a minor contribution to soil-plant hydraulics in both soils and their putative role in water uptake was smaller than that reported for barley (Hordeum vulgare). These results suggest that the role of RHs cannot be easily generalized across species and soil textures affect the response of root hydraulics to soil drying.

摘要

虽然根毛(RHs)在养分吸收中的作用已有充分的记录,但它们在水分吸收和耐旱性方面的作用仍存在争议。我们将玉米(Zea mays)野生型及其毛缺陷突变体(Mut;roothairless 3)在两种不同质地的土壤(沙土和壤土)中生长。我们使用根压室测量土壤干燥过程中蒸腾速率(E)与叶片木质部水势(ψleaf_x)之间的关系。我们的假设是:(1)RHs 扩展了根土接触面积,并减少了高 E 下干燥土壤中 ψleaf_x 的下降;(2)RHs 的影响在沙土中更为明显;(3)Mut 可以通过产生更长和/或更厚的根来部分补偿缺乏 RHs。在湿润条件下,ψleaf_x(E)关系呈线性,随着土壤变干,关系变得非线性。这种非线性在沙土(约-10 kPa)中比在壤土(约-100 kPa)中发生得更突然,基质势也更负。在更负的土壤基质势下,在两种土壤中,土壤水力传导率变得小于根水力传导率。两种基因型在壤土中的根长增加了 1.7 倍,而在沙土中的根厚增加了 1.6 倍。在两个基因型之间,没有观察到 ψleaf_x(E)关系和活跃根长的差异。在玉米中,RHs 在两种土壤中对土壤-植物水力的贡献都较小,它们在水分吸收中的作用小于报道的大麦(Hordeum vulgare)中的作用。这些结果表明,RHs 的作用不能轻易地在物种间推广,土壤质地影响根水力对土壤干燥的响应。

相似文献

1
Soil textures rather than root hairs dominate water uptake and soil-plant hydraulics under drought.在干旱条件下,土壤质地而非根毛主导着水分吸收和土壤-植物水力学。
Plant Physiol. 2021 Oct 5;187(2):858-872. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab271.
2
Stomatal closure of tomato under drought is driven by an increase in soil-root hydraulic resistance.在干旱条件下,番茄气孔关闭是由土壤-根系水力阻力的增加驱动的。
Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Feb;44(2):425-431. doi: 10.1111/pce.13939. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
3
Root hairs enable high transpiration rates in drying soils.根毛使植物在干燥土壤中仍能保持较高的蒸腾速率。
New Phytol. 2017 Nov;216(3):771-781. doi: 10.1111/nph.14715. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
4
Stomatal closure during water deficit is controlled by below-ground hydraulics.在水分亏缺时,气孔关闭由地下水力控制。
Ann Bot. 2022 Jan 28;129(2):161-170. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcab141.
5
Transpiration Reduction in Maize ( L) in Response to Soil Drying.玉米(L)对土壤干燥的蒸腾作用降低
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 23;10:1695. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01695. eCollection 2019.
6
Coupled effects of soil drying and salinity on soil-plant hydraulics.土壤干燥和盐度对土壤-植物水力学的耦合影响。
Plant Physiol. 2022 Sep 28;190(2):1228-1241. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac229.
7
Significance of root hairs for plant performance under contrasting field conditions and water deficit.根毛在不同田间条件和水分亏缺下对植物表现的意义。
Ann Bot. 2021 Jul 28;128(1):1-16. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa181.
8
The role of root hairs in water uptake: recent advances and future perspectives.根毛在吸水过程中的作用:最新进展与未来展望。
J Exp Bot. 2022 Jun 2;73(11):3330-3338. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac114.
9
Above and belowground traits impacting transpiration decline during soil drying in 48 maize (Zea mays) genotypes.在 48 个玉米(Zea mays)基因型中,影响土壤干燥过程中蒸腾作用下降的地上和地下特征。
Ann Bot. 2023 Mar 8;131(2):373-386. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac147.
10
Root hydraulic phenotypes impacting water uptake in drying soils.根系水力表型影响土壤干燥时的水分吸收。
Plant Cell Environ. 2022 Mar;45(3):650-663. doi: 10.1111/pce.14259. Epub 2022 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Between Two Extremes: Root Anatomical Responses to Drought and Waterlogging.在两个极端之间:根系对干旱和涝渍的解剖学响应
Plant Direct. 2025 Jul 19;9(7):e70097. doi: 10.1002/pld3.70097. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
All together now: A mixed-planting experiment reveals adaptive drought tolerance in seedlings of 10 Eucalyptus species.现在一起来:一项混合种植实验揭示了10种桉属树种幼苗的适应性耐旱性。
Plant Physiol. 2024 Dec 23;197(1). doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiae632.
3
Root and rhizosphere traits for enhanced water and nutrients uptake efficiency in dynamic environments.在动态环境中提高水分和养分吸收效率的根系和根际性状。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jul 31;15:1383373. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1383373. eCollection 2024.
4
The effect of amorphous silica on soil-plant-water relations in soils with contrasting textures.无定形二氧化硅对质地不同的土壤中土壤-植物-水分关系的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 4;14(1):10277. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60947-1.
5
Transpiration response to soil drying versus increasing vapor pressure deficit in crops: physical and physiological mechanisms and key plant traits.作物蒸腾对土壤干燥和水汽压亏缺增加的响应:物理和生理机制以及关键植物性状。
J Exp Bot. 2023 Sep 2;74(16):4789-4807. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad221.
6
Genome wide association analysis of root hair traits in rice reveals novel genomic regions controlling epidermal cell differentiation.水稻根毛性状的全基因组关联分析揭示了控制表皮细胞分化的新的基因组区域。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Jan 4;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-04026-5.
7
Above and belowground traits impacting transpiration decline during soil drying in 48 maize (Zea mays) genotypes.在 48 个玉米(Zea mays)基因型中,影响土壤干燥过程中蒸腾作用下降的地上和地下特征。
Ann Bot. 2023 Mar 8;131(2):373-386. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac147.
8
Plant Age and Soil Texture Rather Than the Presence of Root Hairs Cause Differences in Maize Resource Allocation and Root Gene Expression in the Field.在田间,是植株年龄和土壤质地而非根毛的存在导致了玉米资源分配和根系基因表达的差异。
Plants (Basel). 2022 Oct 28;11(21):2883. doi: 10.3390/plants11212883.
9
Coupled effects of soil drying and salinity on soil-plant hydraulics.土壤干燥和盐度对土壤-植物水力学的耦合影响。
Plant Physiol. 2022 Sep 28;190(2):1228-1241. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac229.
10
Optimizing Crop Water Use for Drought and Climate Change Adaptation Requires a Multi-Scale Approach.优化作物水分利用以适应干旱和气候变化需要采用多尺度方法。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 29;13:824720. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.824720. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Root hairs are the most important root trait for rhizosheath formation of barley (Hordeum vulgare), maize (Zea mays) and Lotus japonicus (Gifu).根毛是大麦(Hordeum vulgare)、玉米(Zea mays)和百脉根(Lotus japonicus)形成根鞘的最重要的根特性。
Ann Bot. 2021 Jul 28;128(1):45-57. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcab029.
2
Stomatal closure of tomato under drought is driven by an increase in soil-root hydraulic resistance.在干旱条件下,番茄气孔关闭是由土壤-根系水力阻力的增加驱动的。
Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Feb;44(2):425-431. doi: 10.1111/pce.13939. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
3
Significance of root hairs for plant performance under contrasting field conditions and water deficit.根毛在不同田间条件和水分亏缺下对植物表现的意义。
Ann Bot. 2021 Jul 28;128(1):1-16. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa181.
4
Enhanced root growth of the brb (bald root barley) mutant in drying soil allows similar shoot physiological responses to soil water deficit as wild-type plants.brb(秃根大麦)突变体在干燥土壤中根系生长增强,使其地上部生理反应在土壤水分亏缺时与野生型植株相似。
Funct Plant Biol. 2016 Mar;43(2):199-206. doi: 10.1071/FP15303.
5
Soil Rather Than Xylem Vulnerability Controls Stomatal Response to Drought.土壤而非木质部脆弱性控制着气孔对干旱的响应。
Trends Plant Sci. 2020 Sep;25(9):868-880. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 May 3.
6
Differences in grapevine rootstock sensitivity and recovery from drought are linked to fine root cortical lacunae and root tip function.葡萄砧木对干旱的敏感性及恢复能力的差异与细根皮层腔隙和根尖功能有关。
New Phytol. 2021 Jan;229(1):272-283. doi: 10.1111/nph.16542. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
7
Stomatal closure prevents the drop in soil water potential around roots.气孔关闭可防止根系周围土壤水势下降。
New Phytol. 2020 Jun;226(6):1541-1543. doi: 10.1111/nph.16451. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
8
Transpiration Reduction in Maize ( L) in Response to Soil Drying.玉米(L)对土壤干燥的蒸腾作用降低
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 23;10:1695. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01695. eCollection 2019.
9
Declining root water transport drives stomatal closure in olive under moderate water stress.在中度水分胁迫下,根系水分运输能力下降导致橄榄树气孔关闭。
New Phytol. 2020 Jan;225(1):126-134. doi: 10.1111/nph.16177. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
10
Aquaporin regulation in roots controls plant hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in Pinus radiata under water stress.水分胁迫下 Pinus radiata 根系水通道蛋白调节控制植物水力传导率、气孔导度和叶片水势。
Plant Cell Environ. 2019 Feb;42(2):717-729. doi: 10.1111/pce.13460. Epub 2018 Nov 19.