• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较达拉非沙星治疗复杂性和急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的疗效:一项网络荟萃分析的结果。

Comparative efficacy of delafloxacin for complicated and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: results from a network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Menarini Ricerche Spa, Florence, Italy.

Menarini Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite, Via Sette Santi 1/3, 50131, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;21(1):1036. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06736-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-021-06736-x
PMID:34610820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8491383/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with broad antibacterial activity against pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to evaluate the relative efficacy of delafloxacin versus other comparators used for managing patients with ABSSSI.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating adults (≥ 18 years) with ABSSSI, complicated SSSI (cSSSI), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI) or severe cellulitis with pathogen of gram-positive, gram-negative, or mixed aetiology. OVID MEDLINE, Embase, Epub Ahead of Print, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception through 12 April 2019. A feasibility assessment was conducted, followed by an NMA, which was run in a Bayesian framework. The interventions included in the NMA encompassed monotherapy or combination therapies of amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin, delafloxacin, fusidic acid, iclaprim, linezolid, omadacycline, oxacillin + dicloxacillin, standard therapy, tedizolid, telavancin, tigecycline, vancomycin, vancomycin + aztreonam and vancomycin + linezolid.

RESULTS

A feasibility assessment was performed and evidence networks were established for composite clinical response (n = 34 studies), early clinical response (n = 16 studies) and microbiological response (n = 14 studies) in the overall study population, composite clinical response (n = 4 studies) in obese subpopulation and for composite clinical response (n = 18 studies) and microbiological response (n = 14 studies) in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Delafloxacin performed significantly better than fusidic acid, iclaprim, vancomycin, and ceftobiprole for composite clinical response. Delafloxacin was comparable to dalbavancin, daptomycin, fusidic acid, iclaprim, linezolid, omadacycline, tedizolid, vancomycin, vancomycin + aztreonam and vancomycin + linezolid in the analysis of early clinical response, whereas for microbiological response, delafloxacin was comparable to all interventions. In the obese subpopulation, the results favoured delafloxacin in comparison to vancomycin, whilst the results were comparable with other interventions among the MRSA subpopulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Delafloxacin is a promising new antibiotic for ABSSSI demonstrating greater improvement (composite clinical response) compared to ceftobiprole, fusidic acid, iclaprim, telavancin and vancomycin and comparable effectiveness versus standard of care for all outcomes considered in the study.

摘要

背景

达托霉素是一种新型氟喹诺酮类药物,对引起急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)的病原体具有广泛的抗菌活性。本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在评估达托霉素与用于治疗 ABSSSI 患者的其他对照药物的相对疗效。

方法

系统检索评估成人(≥18 岁)ABSSSI、复杂性皮肤和软组织感染(cSSTI)或伴有革兰阳性、革兰阴性或混合病因的严重蜂窝织炎的随机对照试验(RCT)。检索 OVID MEDLINE、Embase、Epub 提前在线、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库,检索时间从建库至 2019 年 4 月 12 日。进行可行性评估,然后进行 NMA,NMA 在贝叶斯框架下运行。NMA 中包含的干预措施包括阿莫西林/克拉维酸、氨苄西林/舒巴坦、头孢洛林、头孢托罗匹酯、达托霉素、达普霉素、达托霉素、夫西地酸、依克拉普林、利奈唑胺、奥马环素、苯唑西林/双氯西林、标准治疗、替加环素、替考拉宁、替格环素、万古霉素、万古霉素/氨曲南和万古霉素/利奈唑胺的单药或联合治疗。

结果

进行了可行性评估,并为总体研究人群的复合临床反应(n=34 项研究)、早期临床反应(n=16 项研究)和微生物学反应(n=14 项研究)建立了证据网络,为肥胖亚组的复合临床反应(n=4 项研究)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染患者的复合临床反应(n=18 项研究)和微生物学反应(n=14 项研究)建立了证据网络。达托霉素在复合临床反应方面的表现明显优于夫西地酸、依克拉普林、万古霉素和头孢托罗匹酯。达托霉素在早期临床反应分析中与达巴万星、达普霉素、夫西地酸、依克拉普林、利奈唑胺、奥马环素、替加环素、万古霉素、万古霉素/氨曲南和万古霉素/利奈唑胺相当,而在微生物学反应方面,达托霉素与所有干预措施相当。在肥胖亚组中,与万古霉素相比,达托霉素的结果更为有利,而在 MRSA 亚组中,与其他干预措施的结果相当。

结论

达托霉素是一种有前途的新型抗生素,在 ABSSSI 方面的改善更为显著(复合临床反应),优于头孢托罗匹酯、夫西地酸、依克拉普林、替拉万星和万古霉素,与研究中考虑的所有结局的标准治疗相比,其疗效相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/071ef45dc2c0/12879_2021_6736_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/1acd29b6f76f/12879_2021_6736_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/a77b3186a4dd/12879_2021_6736_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/25332a54e9c7/12879_2021_6736_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/3613f3037caa/12879_2021_6736_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/99b1e29f7744/12879_2021_6736_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/071ef45dc2c0/12879_2021_6736_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/1acd29b6f76f/12879_2021_6736_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/a77b3186a4dd/12879_2021_6736_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/25332a54e9c7/12879_2021_6736_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/3613f3037caa/12879_2021_6736_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/99b1e29f7744/12879_2021_6736_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/8491383/071ef45dc2c0/12879_2021_6736_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of delafloxacin for complicated and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: results from a network meta-analysis.比较达拉非沙星治疗复杂性和急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的疗效:一项网络荟萃分析的结果。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;21(1):1036. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06736-x.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Linezolid versus vancomycin for skin and soft tissue infections.利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗皮肤及软组织感染的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 7;2016(1):CD008056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008056.pub3.
6
A network meta-analysis of antibiotics for treatment of hospitalised patients with suspected or proven meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.抗生素治疗疑似或确诊耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染住院患者的网络荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012 Dec;40(6):479-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Comparative efficacy of antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI): a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗生素治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)的比较疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Aug;31(8):1539-51. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1058248. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
9
Interventions for necrotizing soft tissue infections in adults.成人坏死性软组织感染的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 31;5(5):CD011680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011680.pub2.
10
Topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema: network meta-analysis.外用抗炎治疗湿疹:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 6;8(8):CD015064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015064.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of vancomycin compared with those of alternative treatments for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: An umbrella review.万古霉素与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染替代治疗方法的疗效及安全性比较:一项伞状综述
J Evid Based Med. 2024 Dec;17(4):729-739. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12644. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous delafloxacin in healthy subjects: model-based dose optimization.健康受试者中静脉注射 delafloxacin 的药代动力学和药效学:基于模型的剂量优化。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 Jul 9;68(7):e0042824. doi: 10.1128/aac.00428-24. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Vancomycin Hypersensitivity Reactions Documented in Electronic Health Records.电子健康记录中记录的万古霉素过敏反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Feb;9(2):906-912. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
Efficacy and safety of delafloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.达氟沙星治疗急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 May 27;12:1415-1423. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S202160. eCollection 2019.
3
Current Treatment Options for Acute Skin and Skin-structure Infections.
Ceftaroline Fosamil for the Empiric Treatment of Hospitalized Adults with cSSTI: An Economic Analysis from the Perspective of the Spanish National Health System.
头孢洛林酯用于经验性治疗住院成年社区获得性皮肤及软组织感染患者:基于西班牙国家卫生系统视角的经济学分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Mar 18;14:149-161. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S329494. eCollection 2022.
急性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的治疗选择。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 8;68(Suppl 3):S206-S212. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz004.
4
Vital Signs: Epidemiology and Recent Trends in Methicillin-Resistant and in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections - United States.生命体征:耐甲氧西林和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的流行病学和近期趋势 - 美国。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Mar 8;68(9):214-219. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6809e1.
5
Delafloxacin: Place in Therapy and Review of Microbiologic, Clinical and Pharmacologic Properties.达氟沙星:在治疗中的地位以及微生物学、临床和药理学特性综述
Infect Dis Ther. 2018 Jun;7(2):197-217. doi: 10.1007/s40121-018-0198-x. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
6
A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Followed by Oral Delafloxacin With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Phase 3, Multinational, Double-Blind, Randomized Study.静脉注射后序贯口服多氟喹诺酮与万古霉素联合氨曲南治疗急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性比较:一项 3 期、多国、双盲、随机研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 16;67(5):657-666. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy165.
7
Efficacy and safety of delafloxacin compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized study.比较 delafloxacin 与万古霉素加氨曲南治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性:一项 3 期、双盲、随机研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Dec 1;72(12):3471-3480. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx329.
8
Trends in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Hospitalizations in the United States, 2010-2014.2010-2014 年美国耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌住院治疗趋势。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 13;65(11):1921-1923. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix640.
9
Management of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections with a focus on patients at high risk of treatment failure.以治疗失败高风险患者为重点的急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的管理。
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;4(5):143-161. doi: 10.1177/2049936117723228. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
10
Activity of Delafloxacin and Microbiological Response against Fluoroquinolone-Susceptible and Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Two Phase 3 Studies of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.两项急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染 3 期研究中分离的氟喹诺酮敏感和不敏感金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的达托霉素活性和微生物学应答。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00772-17. Print 2017 Sep.