• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肝切除术对超高龄患者(年龄≥80 岁)安全吗?一项倾向评分匹配分析。

Is laparoscopic liver resection safe for super-elderly patients (aged ≥80)? A propensity score-matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Apr;15(2):279-289. doi: 10.1111/ases.12994. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1111/ases.12994
PMID:34612004
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The safety of laparoscopic liver resection in super-elderly patients with comorbidities is unknown. We used propensity score matching to evaluate the utility and safety of laparoscopic liver resection in super-elderly patients.

METHODS

Two-hundred and five patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection were retrospectively reviewed. They were classified into two groups based on age: ≥80 years (elderly group, n = 49) and <80 years (control group, n = 156). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on preoperative clinical parameters. The intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

After matching, 45 patients were included in each group. The intraoperative blood loss was identical between the control and elderly groups (60 vs 60 mL, respectively, P = .588); the frequency of serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo class ≥3, 1/45 vs 1/45, P = 1.00) was also similar. There was no significant difference in terms of the exacerbation of malignancy (22.2% vs 11.1%, P = .258) or other diseases (8.9% vs 22.2%, P = .144). There was no difference in overall survival before and after PSM. However, 5-year overall survival excluding primary cancer-related death showed a difference after PSM (90.7% vs 70.4%; P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic liver resection is feasible and safe in super-elderly patients. The long-term prognosis was poor in patients affected by other illnesses compared to the younger population with similar risk profiles, but there was no difference in overall survival.

摘要

背景/目的:腹腔镜肝切除术在合并症的超高龄患者中的安全性尚不清楚。我们使用倾向评分匹配来评估腹腔镜肝切除术在超高龄患者中的实用性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析了 205 例行腹腔镜肝切除术的患者。根据年龄将他们分为两组:≥80 岁(老年组,n=49)和<80 岁(对照组,n=156)。基于术前临床参数进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。比较了术中及术后结果。

结果

匹配后,每组各有 45 例患者。对照组和老年组的术中出血量相同(分别为 60 毫升和 60 毫升,P=0.588);严重术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo 分级≥3)的发生率也相似(1/45 比 1/45,P=1.00)。恶性肿瘤恶化的比例(22.2%比 11.1%,P=0.258)或其他疾病的比例(8.9%比 22.2%,P=0.144)无显著差异。PSM 前后总生存率无差异。然而,PSM 后排除原发性癌症相关死亡的 5 年总生存率存在差异(90.7%比 70.4%;P=0.048)。

结论

腹腔镜肝切除术在超高龄患者中是可行且安全的。与具有相似风险特征的年轻人群相比,患有其他疾病的患者长期预后较差,但总生存率无差异。

相似文献

1
Is laparoscopic liver resection safe for super-elderly patients (aged ≥80)? A propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术对超高龄患者(年龄≥80 岁)安全吗?一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Apr;15(2):279-289. doi: 10.1111/ases.12994. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
2
A Propensity Score-Based Analysis of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Liver Malignancies in Elderly Patients.基于倾向评分法对老年患者肝脏恶性肿瘤行腹腔镜肝切除术的分析
J Invest Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):75-82. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1373170. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
3
Impact of preoperative aspirin continuation on bleeding complications during or after liver resection: Propensity score-matched analysis.术前继续使用阿司匹林对肝切除术中或术后出血并发症的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Nov;27(11):830-838. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.735. Epub 2020 May 3.
4
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a multi-centre propensity score-based analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年肝细胞癌的多中心倾向评分分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):658-666. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06812-z. Epub 2019 May 15.
5
The efficacy and safety of pure laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in super-elderly patients over 80 years: A multicenter propensity analysis.纯腹腔镜肝切除术治疗 80 岁以上超高龄肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性:多中心倾向评分分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2024 Apr;31(4):234-242. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1395. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Patients with Multiple Hepatocellular Carcinomas Meeting the Milan Criteria: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.符合米兰标准的多发性肝细胞癌患者腹腔镜肝切除的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Sep;29(9):1144-1151. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0362. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
7
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年肝细胞癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2022 Jun;24(6):933-941. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.10.024. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
8
The Safety of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Super-elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.超高龄患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性:倾向评分匹配分析
Cureus. 2023 Jul 18;15(7):e42097. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42097. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases in Elderly and Octogenarian Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score Based Analysis of Short- and Long-term Outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年和八旬老年患者结直肠癌肝转移:基于倾向评分的短期和长期结局的多中心分析。
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1192-1200. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002147.
10
Laparoscopic versus open limited liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study with the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO).腹腔镜与开腹局限性肝切除术治疗肝硬化肝细胞癌的比较:来自广岛临床肿瘤外科学会(HiSCO)的倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):5055-5061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07302-y. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for large (≥ 5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.老年患者大尺寸(≥5厘米)肝细胞癌的腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02113-4.