• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试初级保健转介至在线减肥计划的短期效果:一项随机对照试验。

Testing the short-term effectiveness of primary care referral to online weight loss programmes: A randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.

NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Clin Obes. 2021 Dec;11(6):e12482. doi: 10.1111/cob.12482. Epub 2021 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1111/cob.12482
PMID:34612589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9285966/
Abstract

Guidelines ask health professionals to offer brief advice to encourage weight loss for people living with obesity. We tested whether referral to one of three online programmes could lead to successful weight loss. A total of 528 participants aged ≥18 years with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m were invited via a letter from their GP. Participants were randomised to one of three online weight loss programmes (NHS Weight Loss Plan, Rosemary Online or Slimming World Online) or to a control group receiving no intervention. Participants self-reported weight at baseline and 8 weeks. The primary outcome was weight change in each of the active intervention groups compared with control. We also compared the proportion of participants losing ≥5% or ≥10% of body weight. For Rosemary, Online mean weight loss was modestly greater than control (-1.5 kg [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.3 to -0.6]) and more than three times as many participants in this group lost ≥5% (relative risk [RR] = 3.64, 95% CI: 1.63-8.1). For Slimming World, mean weight loss was not significantly different from control (-0.8 kg [95%CI -1.7 to 0.1]), twice as many participants lost ≥5% (RR = 2.70, 1.17-6.23). There was no significant difference in weight loss for participants using the NHS Weight Loss Plan (-0.4 kg, [95% CI -1.3 to 0.5]), or the proportion losing ≥5% (RR = 2.09, 0.87-5.01). Only one of three online weight loss programmes was superior to no intervention and the effect size modest among participants living with obesity.

摘要

指南要求卫生专业人员提供简短建议,以鼓励肥胖患者减肥。我们测试了将患者转介至三种在线项目之一是否能成功减肥。共有 528 名年龄≥18 岁、BMI≥30kg/m2的患者通过全科医生的一封信被邀请参加。参与者被随机分配到三种在线减肥项目(NHS 减肥计划、Rosemary Online 或 Slimming World Online)或对照组(不接受干预)。参与者在基线和 8 周时自行报告体重。主要结果是每个积极干预组与对照组相比体重变化。我们还比较了体重减轻≥5%或≥10%的参与者比例。对于 Rosemary Online,平均体重减轻量明显大于对照组(-1.5kg[95%置信区间(CI)-2.3 至-0.6]),且该组中有更多的参与者体重减轻≥5%(相对风险[RR]为 3.64,95%CI:1.63-8.1)。对于 Slimming World,平均体重减轻与对照组无显著差异(-0.8kg[95%CI-1.7 至 0.1]),但有两倍多的参与者体重减轻≥5%(RR 为 2.70,1.17-6.23)。使用 NHS 减肥计划的参与者体重减轻量无显著差异(-0.4kg[95%CI-1.3 至 0.5]),或体重减轻≥5%的比例(RR 为 2.09,0.87-5.01)。三种在线减肥项目中只有一种优于无干预,且肥胖患者的效果适中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e29/9285966/6ad4fdf20922/COB-11-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e29/9285966/926fb0fd66bb/COB-11-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e29/9285966/6ad4fdf20922/COB-11-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e29/9285966/926fb0fd66bb/COB-11-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e29/9285966/6ad4fdf20922/COB-11-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Testing the short-term effectiveness of primary care referral to online weight loss programmes: A randomised controlled trial.测试初级保健转介至在线减肥计划的短期效果:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Obes. 2021 Dec;11(6):e12482. doi: 10.1111/cob.12482. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
2
Tackling obesity in areas of high social deprivation: clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a task-based weight management group programme - a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.解决高度社会贫困地区的肥胖问题:基于任务的体重管理小组计划的临床效果和成本效益——一项随机对照试验和经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Oct;20(79):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta20790.
3
Randomised controlled trial and economic analysis of an internet-based weight management programme: POWeR+ (Positive Online Weight Reduction).一项基于互联网的体重管理计划:POWeR+(积极在线减重)的随机对照试验及经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jan;21(4):1-62. doi: 10.3310/hta21040.
4
Weight loss referrals for adults in primary care (WRAP): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of primary care referral to a commercial weight loss provider for 12 weeks, referral for 52 weeks, and a brief self-help intervention [ISRCTN82857232].初级保健中成人减肥转诊(WRAP):一项多中心随机对照试验的方案,比较转诊至商业减肥机构进行12周治疗、52周治疗以及简短自助干预的临床效果和成本效益[国际标准随机对照试验编号82857232]
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 18;14:620. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-620.
5
Which weight-loss programmes are as effective as Weight Watchers(R)?: non-inferiority analysis.哪些减肥计划与慧俪轻体(Weight Watchers(R))同样有效?:非劣效性分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Mar;64(620):e128-36. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677491.
6
The equity impact of brief opportunistic interventions to promote weight loss in primary care: secondary analysis of the BWeL randomised trial.初级保健中简短机会性干预促进减肥的公平影响:BWeL 随机试验的二次分析。
BMC Med. 2019 Mar 1;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1284-y.
7
A randomised controlled trial to compare a range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes with a minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: the Lighten Up trial.一项随机对照试验,旨在比较一系列商业或初级保健主导的减肥项目与最小干预对照组在肥胖症减肥方面的效果:Lighten Up 试验。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jul 27;10:439. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-439.
8
Comparison of range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes with minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: lighten Up randomised controlled trial.比较商业或初级保健主导的减肥项目与最小干预对照组在肥胖人群中的减肥效果:Ligten Up 随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 3;343:d6500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6500.
9
A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a motivational interviewing-based intervention for weight loss maintenance in adults.一项针对成年人减肥维持的基于动机性访谈干预的可行性随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(50):v-vi, xix-xxv, 1-378. doi: 10.3310/hta19500.
10
Practice nurse-supported weight self-management delivered within the national child immunisation programme for postnatal women: a feasibility cluster RCT.在国家儿童免疫计划内,由执业护士提供支持的产后妇女体重自我管理:一项可行性整群 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Aug;25(49):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta25490.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Health Solutions for Weight Loss and Obesity: A Narrative Review.数字健康解决方案在减肥和肥胖管理中的应用:叙事性综述。
Nutrients. 2023 Apr 12;15(8):1858. doi: 10.3390/nu15081858.
2
Weight loss outcomes achieved by adults accessing an online programme offered as part of Public Health England's 'Better Health' campaign.成年人通过参与英国公共卫生部“更健康”活动提供的在线项目实现的减肥效果。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):1456. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13847-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Behavioral Weight Management Interventions Using Lifestyle mHealth Self-Monitoring on Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.行为体重管理干预措施使用生活方式移动医疗自我监测对减肥的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 3;12(7):1977. doi: 10.3390/nu12071977.
2
Evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial.评估免费在线减肥计划、资源密集型商业减肥计划和积极对照条件在临床影响方面的差异:一项平行随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):1732. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8061-x.
3
Web-Based Digital Health Interventions for Weight Loss and Lifestyle Habit Changes in Overweight and Obese Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
基于网络的数字健康干预对超重和肥胖成年人减肥及生活方式习惯改变的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 8;21(1):e298. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9609.
4
Web-Based Interventions for Weight Loss or Weight Loss Maintenance in Overweight and Obese People: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.基于网络的超重和肥胖人群减肥或维持体重干预措施:系统评价的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 26;19(6):e229. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6972.
5
Screening and brief intervention for obesity in primary care: a parallel, two-arm, randomised trial.基层医疗中肥胖症的筛查与简短干预:一项平行双臂随机试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2492-2500. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31893-1. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
Inequalities in the uptake of weight management interventions in a pragmatic trial: an observational study in primary care.一项实用试验中体重管理干预措施采用情况的不平等性:一项初级保健中的观察性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Apr;66(645):e258-63. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684337. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
eHealth interventions for the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis.电子健康干预措施对成年人超重和肥胖的预防与治疗:一项Meta分析的系统评价
Obes Rev. 2015 May;16(5):376-92. doi: 10.1111/obr.12268. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
8
Self-help for weight loss in overweight and obese adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.超重和肥胖成年人的减肥自助方法:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105(3):e43-57. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302389. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
9
Factors predictive of drop-out and weight loss success in weight management of obese patients.肥胖患者体重管理中预测退出及体重减轻成功的因素。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Feb;28 Suppl 2:24-32. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12270. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
10
Evaluation of early weight loss thresholds for identifying nonresponders to an intensive lifestyle intervention.评估用于识别强化生活方式干预无反应者的早期体重减轻阈值。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jul;22(7):1608-16. doi: 10.1002/oby.20777. Epub 2014 Apr 28.