Sorgente Angela, Pietrabissa Giada, Manzoni Gian Mauro, Re Federica, Simpson Susan, Perona Sara, Rossi Alessandro, Cattivelli Roberto, Innamorati Marco, Jackson Jeffrey B, Castelnuovo Gianluca
Psychology Research Laboratory, Ospedale San Giuseppe, IRCCS, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Verbania, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 26;19(6):e229. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6972.
Weight loss is challenging and maintenance of weight loss is problematic. Web-based programs offer good potential for delivery of interventions for weight loss or weight loss maintenance. However, the precise impact of Web-based weight management programs is still unclear.
The purpose of this meta-systematic review was to provide a comprehensive summary of the efficacy of Web-based interventions for weight loss and weight loss maintenance.
Electronic databases were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses that included at least one study investigating the effect of a Web-based intervention on weight loss and/or weight loss maintenance among samples of overweight and/or obese individuals. Twenty identified reviews met the inclusion criteria. The Revised Assessment of Multiple SysTemAtic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) was used to assess methodological quality of reviews. All included reviews were of sufficient methodological quality (R-AMSTAR score ≥22). Key methodological and outcome data were extracted from each review.
Web-based interventions for both weight loss and weight loss maintenance were more effective than minimal or control conditions. However, when contrasted with comparable non-Web-based interventions, results were less consistent across reviews.
Overall, the efficacy of weight loss maintenance interventions was stronger than the efficacy of weight loss interventions, but further evidence is needed to more clearly understand the efficacy of both types of Web-based interventions.
PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015029377; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp? ID=CRD42015029377 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6qkSafdCZ).
体重减轻具有挑战性,且维持体重减轻的效果也存在问题。基于网络的项目为提供减肥或维持体重减轻的干预措施具有良好潜力。然而,基于网络的体重管理项目的确切影响仍不明确。
本荟萃系统评价的目的是全面总结基于网络的减肥和维持体重减轻干预措施的疗效。
检索电子数据库,查找系统评价和荟萃分析,其中至少有一项研究调查了基于网络的干预措施对超重和/或肥胖个体样本的减肥和/或维持体重减轻的影响。20项纳入的评价符合纳入标准。使用修订后的多系统评价评估(R-AMSTAR)来评估评价的方法学质量。所有纳入的评价在方法学质量上均足够(R-AMSTAR评分≥22)。从每项评价中提取关键的方法学和结果数据。
基于网络的减肥和维持体重减轻干预措施比最小干预或对照条件更有效。然而,与类似的非基于网络的干预措施相比,各评价的结果不太一致。
总体而言,维持体重减轻干预措施的疗效强于减肥干预措施,但需要更多证据来更清楚地了解这两种基于网络的干预措施的疗效。
PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015029377;http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp? ID=CRD42015029377(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6qkSafdCZ)