University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Brain Behav. 2021 Nov;11(11):e2363. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2363. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
The increase in smartphone usage has enabled the possibility of more accessible ways to conduct neuropsychological evaluations. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of using smartphone typing dynamics with mood scores to supplement cognitive assessment through trail making tests.
Using a custom-built keyboard, naturalistic keypress dynamics were unobtrusively recorded in individuals with bipolar disorder (n = 11) and nonbipolar controls (n = 8) on an Android smartphone. Keypresses were matched to digital trail making tests part B (dTMT-B) administered daily in two periods and weekly mood assessments. Following comparison of dTMT-Bs to the pencil-and-paper equivalent, longitudinal mixed-effects models were used to analyze daily dTMT-B performance as a function of typing and mood.
Comparison of the first dTMT-B to paper TMT-B showed adequate reliability (intraclass correlations = 0.74). In our model, we observed that participants who typed slower took longer to complete dTMT-B (b = 0.189, p < .001). This trend was also seen in individual fluctuations in typing speed and dTMT-B performance (b = 0.032, p = .004). Moreover, participants who were more depressed completed the dTMT-B slower than less depressed participants (b = 0.189, p < .001). A practice effect was observed for the dTMT-Bs.
Typing speed in combination with depression scores has the potential to infer aspects of cognition (visual attention, processing speed, and task switching) in people's natural environment to complement formal in-person neuropsychological assessments that commonly include the trail making test.
智能手机使用率的增加使得进行神经心理学评估的方式更加便捷。本研究旨在确定使用智能手机打字动力学与情绪评分来补充通过追踪测试进行认知评估的可行性。
使用定制键盘,在患有双相情感障碍的个体(n=11)和非双相情感障碍对照者(n=8)的 Android 智能手机上,非侵入性地记录自然的按键动力学。将按键与每日两次和每周一次的情绪评估中进行的数字追踪测试 B(dTMT-B)相匹配。在将 dTMT-B 与纸笔版进行比较后,使用纵向混合效应模型分析日常 dTMT-B 表现作为打字和情绪的函数。
将第一个 dTMT-B 与纸笔版 TMT-B 进行比较,显示出足够的可靠性(组内相关系数=0.74)。在我们的模型中,我们观察到打字速度较慢的参与者完成 dTMT-B 的时间更长(b=0.189,p<.001)。这种趋势在打字速度和 dTMT-B 表现的个体波动中也可见(b=0.032,p=.004)。此外,抑郁程度较高的参与者完成 dTMT-B 的速度比抑郁程度较低的参与者慢(b=0.189,p<.001)。我们观察到 dTMT-B 存在练习效应。
打字速度与抑郁评分相结合,有可能推断人们自然环境中的认知方面(视觉注意力、处理速度和任务转换),以补充通常包括追踪测试的正式面对面神经心理学评估。