Suppr超能文献

使用机器学习技术对连线测验数字变体的分析。

An analysis of a digital variant of the Trail Making Test using machine learning techniques.

作者信息

Dahmen Jessamyn, Cook Diane, Fellows Robert, Schmitter-Edgecombe Maureen

机构信息

School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.

Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2017;25(2):251-264. doi: 10.3233/THC-161274.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The goal of this work is to develop a digital version of a standard cognitive assessment, the Trail Making Test (TMT), and assess its utility.

OBJECTIVE

This paper introduces a novel digital version of the TMT and introduces a machine learning based approach to assess its capabilities.

METHODS

Using digital Trail Making Test (dTMT) data collected from (N = 54) older adult participants as feature sets, we use machine learning techniques to analyze the utility of the dTMT and evaluate the insights provided by the digital features.

RESULTS

Predicted TMT scores correlate well with clinical digital test scores (r = 0.98) and paper time to completion scores (r = 0.65). Predicted TICS exhibited a small correlation with clinically derived TICS scores (r = 0.12 Part A, r = 0.10 Part B). Predicted FAB scores exhibited a small correlation with clinically derived FAB scores (r = 0.13 Part A, r = 0.29 for Part B). Digitally derived features were also used to predict diagnosis (AUC of 0.65).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the dTMT is capable of measuring the same aspects of cognition as the paper-based TMT. Furthermore, the dTMT's additional data may be able to help monitor other cognitive processes not captured by the paper-based TMT alone.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是开发标准认知评估工具——连线测验(TMT)的数字版本,并评估其效用。

目的

本文介绍了一种新颖的TMT数字版本,并引入了一种基于机器学习的方法来评估其性能。

方法

以从54名老年参与者收集的数字连线测验(dTMT)数据作为特征集,我们使用机器学习技术分析dTMT的效用,并评估数字特征所提供的信息。

结果

预测的TMT分数与临床数字测试分数(r = 0.98)和纸质版完成时间分数(r = 0.65)高度相关。预测的TICS与临床得出的TICS分数相关性较小(A部分r = 0.12,B部分r = 0.10)。预测的FAB分数与临床得出的FAB分数相关性较小(A部分r = 0.13,B部分r = 0.29)。数字衍生特征也用于预测诊断(AUC为0.65)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,dTMT能够测量与纸质版TMT相同的认知方面。此外,dTMT的额外数据可能有助于监测仅纸质版TMT无法捕捉的其他认知过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32ff/5384876/5cbee5edeef7/nihms845821f1.jpg

相似文献

2
Multicomponent analysis of a digital Trail Making Test.数字连线测验的多成分分析
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Jan;31(1):154-167. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1238510. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
Digital trail making test-black and white: Normal vs MCI.数字连线测验-黑白:正常对照与 MCI。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Nov-Dec;29(6):1296-1303. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1871615. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
Driving Trail Making Test part B: a variant of the TMT-B.驾驶连线测验B部分:连线测验B的一种变体。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(1):148-53. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.148. Epub 2016 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验