Suppr超能文献

肝细胞癌伴门静脉癌栓患者最佳治疗方法的疗效比较

Efficacy comparison of optimal treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus.

作者信息

Zhang Yu, Wu Jun-Li, Li Le-Qun

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China; Kaiyuan Langdong Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.

出版信息

Ann Hepatol. 2022 Jan-Feb;27(1):100552. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2021.100552. Epub 2021 Oct 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Optimal treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) involving portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains controversial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 627 HCC patients with PVTT after initial treatment with one of the following at Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University: liver resection (LR, n = 225), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, n = 298) or sorafenib (n = 104) were recruited and randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 314) and internal validation cohort (n = 313). Survival analysis were repeated after stratifying patients by Cheng PVTT type.

RESULTS

Resection led to significantly higher OS than the other two treatments among patients with type I or II PVTT. TACE worked significantly better than the other two treatments for patients with type III. All three treatments were associated with similar OS among patients with type IV. These findings were supported by the internal validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the optimal treatment for HCC involving PVTT depends on the type of PVTT. LR may be more appropriate for type I or II PVTT; TACE, for type III Sorafenib may be more appropriate than invasive treatments for patients with type IV PVTT.

摘要

引言与目的

肝细胞癌(HCC)合并门静脉癌栓(PVTT)的最佳治疗方案仍存在争议。

材料与方法

广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院共招募了627例经以下初始治疗之一后出现PVTT的HCC患者:肝切除术(LR,n = 225)、经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE,n = 298)或索拉非尼(n = 104),并将其随机分为训练队列(n = 314)和内部验证队列(n = 313)。根据程氏PVTT分型对患者进行分层后,重复进行生存分析。

结果

在I型或II型PVTT患者中,肝切除术的总生存期显著高于其他两种治疗方法。对于III型患者,TACE的效果明显优于其他两种治疗方法。IV型患者中,所有三种治疗方法的总生存期相似。内部验证队列支持了这些发现。

结论

我们的结果表明,HCC合并PVTT的最佳治疗方案取决于PVTT的类型。肝切除术可能更适合I型或II型PVTT;TACE适合III型。对于IV型PVTT患者,索拉非尼可能比侵入性治疗更合适。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验