• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血清学快速抗体检测在疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎病例管理中的作用

Role of serological rapid antibody test in the management of possible COVID-19 cases.

作者信息

Yıldırım Fatma, Gulhan Pinar Yildiz, Diken Özlem Ercen, Capraz Aylin, Simsek Meltem, Yildirim Berna Botan, Taysi Muhammet Ridvan, Ozturk Sakine Yilmaz, Demirtas Nurcan, Ergil Julide, Dirican Adem, Uzar Tugce, Karaman Irem, Ozkaya Sevket

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Health Sciences Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Research and Education Hospital, Ankara 06110, Turkey.

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Düzce University, Faculty of Medicine, Düzce 81100, Turkey.

出版信息

World J Exp Med. 2021 Sep 20;11(4):44-54. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v11.i4.44.

DOI:10.5493/wjem.v11.i4.44
PMID:34616666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8462010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the detection of viral particles by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard diagnostic test for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the false-negative results constitute a big challenge.

AIM

To examine a group of patients diagnosed and treated as possible COVID-19 pneumonia whose multiple nasopharyngeal swab samples were negative for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by RT-PCR but then serological immunoglobulin M/immunoglobulin G (IgM/IgG) antibody against SARS-CoV-2 were detected by rapid antibody test.

METHODS

Eighty possible COVID-19 patients who had at least two negative consecutive COVID-19 RT-PCR test and were subjected to serological rapid antibody test were evaluated in this study.

RESULTS

The specific serological total IgM/IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2 was detected in twenty-two patients. The mean age of this patient group was 63.2± 13.1-years-old with a male/female ratio of 11/11. Cough was the most common symptom (90.9%). The most common presenting chest computed tomography findings were bilateral ground glass opacities (77.2%) and alveolar consolidations (50.1%). The mean duration of time from appearance of first symptoms to hospital admission, to hospital admission, to treatment duration and to serological positivity were 8.6 d, 11.2 d, 7.9 d, and 24 d, respectively. Compared with reference laboratory values, serologically positive patients have shown increased levels of acute phase reactants, such as C-reactive protein, ferritin, and procalcitonin and higher inflammatory markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate, lactate dehydrogenase enzyme, and fibrin end-products, such as D-dimer. A left shift on white blood cell differential was observed with increased neutrophil counts and decreased lymphocytes.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated the feasibility of a COVID-19 diagnosis based on rapid antibody test in the cases of patients whose RT-PCR samples were negative. Detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 with rapid antibody test should be included in the diagnostic algorithm in patients with possible COVID-19 pneumonia.

摘要

背景

尽管通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测病毒颗粒是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的金标准诊断测试,但假阴性结果构成了巨大挑战。

目的

检查一组被诊断并作为可能的COVID-19肺炎进行治疗的患者,其多个鼻咽拭子样本经RT-PCR检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)呈阴性,但随后通过快速抗体检测检测到针对SARS-CoV-2的血清免疫球蛋白M/免疫球蛋白G(IgM/IgG)抗体。

方法

本研究评估了80例可能的COVID-19患者,这些患者至少连续两次COVID-19 RT-PCR检测呈阴性,并接受了血清学快速抗体检测。

结果

22例患者检测到针对SARS-CoV-2的特异性血清总IgM/IgG抗体。该患者组的平均年龄为63.2±13.1岁,男女比例为11/11。咳嗽是最常见的症状(90.9%)。最常见的胸部计算机断层扫描表现是双侧磨玻璃影(77.2%)和肺泡实变(50.1%)。从首次出现症状到入院、入院到治疗持续时间以及血清学阳性的平均时间分别为8.6天、11.2天、7.9天和24天。与参考实验室值相比,血清学阳性患者的急性期反应物水平升高,如C反应蛋白、铁蛋白和降钙素原,以及更高的炎症标志物,如红细胞沉降率、乳酸脱氢酶和纤维蛋白终产物,如D-二聚体。观察到白细胞分类出现左移,中性粒细胞计数增加,淋巴细胞减少。

结论

我们的研究证明了在RT-PCR样本为阴性的患者中基于快速抗体检测进行COVID-19诊断的可行性。对于可能患有COVID-19肺炎的患者,诊断算法中应包括通过快速抗体检测检测针对SARS-CoV-2的抗体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/ce75c17fb836/WJEM-11-44-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/2ebfb9b32762/WJEM-11-44-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/beb3081816b1/WJEM-11-44-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/174218a10c40/WJEM-11-44-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/1cb9c74381d6/WJEM-11-44-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/46f84c0eaf28/WJEM-11-44-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/ce75c17fb836/WJEM-11-44-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/2ebfb9b32762/WJEM-11-44-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/beb3081816b1/WJEM-11-44-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/174218a10c40/WJEM-11-44-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/1cb9c74381d6/WJEM-11-44-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/46f84c0eaf28/WJEM-11-44-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b253/8462010/ce75c17fb836/WJEM-11-44-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Role of serological rapid antibody test in the management of possible COVID-19 cases.血清学快速抗体检测在疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎病例管理中的作用
World J Exp Med. 2021 Sep 20;11(4):44-54. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v11.i4.44.
2
Rapid Serological Assays and SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2: Comparative Study.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的快速血清学检测和SARS-CoV-2实时聚合酶链反应检测:比较研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 30;22(10):e19152. doi: 10.2196/19152.
3
Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.评价两种 SARS-CoV-2 快速 IgM-IgG 联合抗体检测试剂盒在指尖毛细血管全血样本中的性能。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0237694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237694. eCollection 2020.
4
Repeatedly negative PCR results in patients with COVID-19 symptoms: Do they have SARS-CoV-2 infection or not?新冠病毒感染患者多次 PCR 检测结果为阴性:他们到底有没有感染 SARS-CoV-2 呢?
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2021 Spring;70(1):3-9.
5
Clinical application of combined detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody and nucleic acid.新型冠状病毒2特异性抗体与核酸联合检测的临床应用
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Oct 6;8(19):4360-4369. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4360.
6
Clinical diagnostic performance evaluation of five immunoassays for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in a real-life routine care setting.五种用于 SARS-CoV-2 抗体诊断的免疫分析方法在真实临床常规检测环境中的临床诊断性能评估。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 May 3;39:3. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.3.26471. eCollection 2021.
7
Analysis of Nucleic Acid and Antibody Detection Results for SARS-CoV-2 Infection.分析 SARS-CoV-2 感染的核酸和抗体检测结果。
Arch Iran Med. 2021 May 1;24(5):427-433. doi: 10.34172/aim.2021.61.
8
Relationship between viral load, infection-to-delivery interval and mother-to-child transfer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.病毒载量、感染至分娩间隔与抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体母婴传播的关系。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):974-978. doi: 10.1002/uog.23639.
9
Antibody Detection and Dynamic Characteristics in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的抗体检测及动态特征。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 5;71(8):1930-1934. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa461.
10
Prevalence of Sars-Cov-2 Infection in Health Workers (HWs) and Diagnostic Test Performance: The Experience of a Teaching Hospital in Central Italy.意大利中部一所教学医院的卫生工作者(HWs)中 SARS-CoV-2 感染的流行率和诊断检测性能。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 19;17(12):4417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124417.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
2
Performance of a serological IgM and IgG qualitative test for COVID-19 diagnosis: An experimental study in Brazil.用于新冠病毒疾病诊断的血清学 IgM 和 IgG 定性检测的性能:巴西的一项实验研究。
World J Exp Med. 2022 Sep 20;12(5):100-103. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v12.i5.100.
3
Clinical practice of rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: A single-center study in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency of serological non-responders and false-negative RT-PCR results in SARS-CoV-2 testing: a population-based study.血清学无应答者和 SARS-CoV-2 检测中假阴性 RT-PCR 结果的频率:一项基于人群的研究。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Aug 31;58(12):2131-2140. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0978.
2
COVID-19 Testing: The Threat of False-Negative Results.新冠病毒检测:假阴性结果的威胁。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Jun;95(6):1127-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
3
Chest CT findings of COVID-19 pneumonia by duration of symptoms.
SARS-CoV-2 奥密克戎变异株快速抗原检测的临床实践:中国单中心研究。
Virol Sin. 2022 Dec;37(6):842-849. doi: 10.1016/j.virs.2022.08.008. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
以症状持续时间为特征的 COVID-19 肺炎的胸部 CT 表现。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Jun;127:109009. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109009. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
4
Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT?冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的诊断:实时 RT-PCR 还是 CT?
Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108961. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108961. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
5
Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019.新型冠状病毒病 2019 患者的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2027-2034. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa344.
6
Profiling Early Humoral Response to Diagnose Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).分析早期体液免疫反应以诊断新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):778-785. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa310.
7
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens.SARS-CoV-2 在不同类型临床标本中的检测。
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1843-1844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786.
8
Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.《中国 2019 年冠状病毒病临床特征》
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
9
Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.中国武汉 81 例新冠肺炎患者的放射学特征:一项描述性研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;20(4):425-434. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
10
Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases.中国 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的胸部 CT 与 RT-PCR 检测的相关性:1014 例报告。
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642. Epub 2020 Feb 26.