• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症姑息治疗患者的减药:工具和指南的简明综述。

Deprescribing in palliative patients with cancer: a concise review of tools and guidelines.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2022 Apr;30(4):2933-2943. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06605-y. Epub 2021 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-021-06605-y
PMID:34617161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8857105/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Palliative cancer patients can benefit from deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Tools and guidelines developed for the geriatric population are mainly available. This systematic review gives an overview of available guidelines and tools to deprescribe for palliative cancer patients.

METHODS

A systematic search was carried out using the databases SCOPUS and PubMed. Studies focused on palliative cancer patients were included.

RESULTS

The search identified 137 studies of which 15 studies were included in this systematic review. Six of the included tools were developed specifically for cancer patients. One of these tools was externally validated and applied in several studies and settings. Guidelines or tools that were not specifically developed for cancer patients but that were applied on cohorts of palliative cancer patients were also included.

CONCLUSION

Tools developed for geriatric patients contain drugs that are not inappropriate when used in the palliative cancer care setting. Tools developed for cancer patients are more suitable and can be applied in combination with stepwise methods to individualize deprescribing per patient. The tools and guidelines described in this systematic review can be used to further implement deprescribing in the clinical routine for palliative cancer patients.

摘要

目的

姑息治疗癌症患者可从潜在不适当药物(PIMs)的减药中获益。主要提供了适用于老年人群的工具和指南。本系统评价概述了姑息治疗癌症患者减药可用的指南和工具。

方法

使用 SCOPUS 和 PubMed 数据库进行系统检索。纳入关注姑息治疗癌症患者的研究。

结果

搜索共确定了 137 项研究,其中 15 项研究纳入本系统评价。纳入的 15 项工具中有 6 项是专门为癌症患者开发的。其中一个工具经过外部验证,并在多项研究和环境中应用。还纳入了不是专门为癌症患者开发但应用于姑息治疗癌症患者队列的指南或工具。

结论

为老年患者开发的工具中包含在姑息治疗癌症护理环境中使用时不适当的药物。为癌症患者开发的工具更适用,并且可以与逐步方法结合应用,以针对每个患者进行个体化减药。本系统评价中描述的工具和指南可用于进一步将减药纳入姑息治疗癌症患者的临床常规。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/661b/8857105/874b15b0a5dd/520_2021_6605_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/661b/8857105/874b15b0a5dd/520_2021_6605_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/661b/8857105/874b15b0a5dd/520_2021_6605_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Deprescribing in palliative patients with cancer: a concise review of tools and guidelines.癌症姑息治疗患者的减药:工具和指南的简明综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Apr;30(4):2933-2943. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06605-y. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people.改善老年人合理使用多种药物的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 3;9(9):CD008165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008165.pub4.
7
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
8
Impact of Deprescribing Interventions in Older Hospitalised Patients on Prescribing and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomised Trials.老年住院患者撤药干预对处方和临床结局的影响:随机试验的系统评价
Drugs Aging. 2018 Apr;35(4):303-319. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0536-4.
9
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.纤维素、改性纤维素和合成膜在终末期肾病患者血液透析中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.
10
Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.用于血尿调查的诊断测试和算法:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jun;10(18):iii-iv, xi-259. doi: 10.3310/hta10180.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision-making and deprescribing to support anti-thrombotic therapy (dis)continuance for persons living with cancer in their last phase of life: A realist synthesis.共同决策与减药以支持处于生命终末期的癌症患者抗血栓治疗的(停)用:一项实在论综合分析
PLoS Med. 2025 Aug 25;22(8):e1004663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004663. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Medication Prescriptions for Chronic Diseases in Terminal Cancer Patients in Korea: A Real-World Study.韩国晚期癌症患者慢性病药物处方:一项真实世界研究。
J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 1;28(1):18-24. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2025.28.1.18.
3
DEprescribing: Perceptions of PAtients living with advanced cancer. A multicentre, prospective mixed observational study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications Among Older Adults in the United States.评估美国老年人中潜在不适当药物的使用情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Dec;68(12):2927-2930. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16779. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
2
The impact of palliative care consults on deprescribing in palliative cancer patients.姑息治疗咨询对癌症终末期患者药物减量的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4107-4113. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05234-w. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Deep vein thrombosis: update on diagnosis and management.深静脉血栓形成:诊断与管理的最新进展。
撤药:晚期癌症患者的认知。一项多中心、前瞻性混合观察研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 20;19(8):e0305737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305737. eCollection 2024.
4
Appropriate medication use in Dutch terminal care: study protocol of a multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial (the AMUSE study).荷兰终末期关怀中适当药物使用的研究方案:一项多中心阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验(AMUSE 研究)。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 3;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01334-x.
5
Deprescribing: A Prime Opportunity to Optimize Care of Cancer Patients.减药:优化癌症患者护理的绝佳机会。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Nov 2;30(11):9701-9709. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30110704.
6
Optimizing pharmacotherapy and deprescribing strategies in older adults living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: EuGMS SIG on pharmacology position paper.优化患有多种疾病和多种药物治疗的老年患者的药物治疗和减药策略:EuGMS 药理学工作组关于立场文件的建议。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2023 Dec;14(6):1195-1209. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00872-0. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
7
Perspectives on deprescribing in palliative care.舒缓治疗中药物减量的观点。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2023 May;16(5):411-421. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2197592. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
Med J Aust. 2019 Jun;210(11):516-524. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50201. Epub 2019 Jun 2.
4
A Study of Medication Use of Cancer and Non-Cancer Patients in Home Hospice Care in Singapore: A Retrospective Study from 2011 to 2015.新加坡居家安宁疗护中癌症与非癌症患者用药情况的研究:一项 2011 年至 2015 年的回顾性研究。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Oct;22(10):1243-1251. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0559. Epub 2019 May 8.
5
Preventive drugs in the last year of life of older adults with cancer: Is there room for deprescribing?老年人癌症临终前的预防药物:是否有减药的空间?
Cancer. 2019 Jul 1;125(13):2309-2317. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32044. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
6
Potentially inappropriate medications defined by STOPP criteria in older patients with breast and colorectal cancer.STOPP 标准定义的老年乳腺癌和结直肠癌患者潜在不适当药物。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Sep;10(5):705-708. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
7
Associations Between Polypharmacy, Symptom Burden, and Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced, Life-Limiting Illness.在患有晚期、生命有限疾病的患者中,药物滥用、症状负担和生活质量之间的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Apr;34(4):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04837-7. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
8
Better drug use in advanced disease: an international Delphi study.晚期疾病中的药物使用改善:一项国际 Delphi 研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Oct;13(e1):e115-e121. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001623. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
9
Missed opportunities: unnecessary medicine use in patients with lung cancer at the end of life - an international cohort study.错失的机会:终末期肺癌患者不必要的药物使用 - 一项国际队列研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;84(12):2802-2810. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13735. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
10
Potentially inappropriate medication use in older patients with breast and colorectal cancer.老年乳腺癌和结直肠癌患者潜在不适当药物使用。
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):3000-3007. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31403. Epub 2018 Apr 24.