Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United States; Analytics and PsychoPharmacology Laboratory (APPL) and the Program of Excellence in Addiction Research (PEAR), Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United States.
Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United States; Analytics and PsychoPharmacology Laboratory (APPL) and the Program of Excellence in Addiction Research (PEAR), Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United States.
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Jan;99:103464. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103464. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
Smoked cocaine (i.e., crack use) is a severe health problem in Brazil, with the country being reported as having the largest crack market in the world. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating Contingency Management targeting cocaine abstinence into a public treatment program in Brazil.
Single-blind randomized controlled trial conducted at Unidade Recomeço Helvétia (URH), a public ambulatory treatment program for persons who use crack and live in the "Crackland" region in downtown São Paulo, Brazil. In total, 98 treatment-seeking individuals who use crack were randomized to one of two treatment conditions. Participants allocated to the control condition (n = 48) received 12 weeks of the standard treatment provided at URH. Participants allocated to the experimental condition (n = 50) received the same treatment in combination with Contingency Management (URH+CM). In URH+CM, participants were provided with vouchers with monetary value for submission of negative cocaine urinalysis twice weekly.
Compared to the URH group, the URH+CM group was significantly more likely to submit a negative cocaine urinalysis during treatment, with odds ratios ranging from 4.17 to 6.78, depending on how missing data was accounted for (p<0.01). Participants receiving Contingency Management also had higher odds of achieving three or more weeks of continuous abstinence (OR= 8.07; 95% CI [2.48, 26.24]), achieved longer durations of abstinence (B = 2.14; 95% CI [0.67, 3.61]), submitted a higher percentage of negative urinalysis (B = 19.85; 95% CI [6.89, 32.82]), and were retained in treatment for a longer period (B = 3.00; 95% CI [1.04, 4.97]), compared to those receiving URH alone (p<0.01 for all).
The incorporation of Contingency Management was effective in promoting cocaine abstinence and treatment retention. The large-scale dissemination of Contingency Management may be an effective strategy to treat Brazilians with cocaine use disorders.
在巴西,吸食可卡因(即吸食快克可卡因)是一个严重的健康问题,据报道该国拥有世界上最大的快克可卡因市场。本研究的目的是评估将针对可卡因戒除的条件强化管理纳入巴西公共治疗计划的有效性。
这是一项在巴西圣保罗市中心“可卡因地带”的 Helvétia 康复门诊(URH)进行的单盲随机对照试验。该试验纳入了 98 名寻求治疗的快克可卡因使用者,将他们随机分配至两种治疗条件。分配至对照组(n=48)的参与者接受为期 12 周的 URH 标准治疗。分配至实验组(n=50)的参与者接受相同的治疗联合条件强化管理(URH+CM)。在 URH+CM 中,参与者每周提交两次阴性可卡因尿液检测,可获得具有货币价值的代金券。
与 URH 组相比,URH+CM 组在治疗期间更有可能提交阴性可卡因尿液检测,其比值比(OR)范围为 4.17 至 6.78,具体取决于如何处理缺失数据(p<0.01)。接受条件强化管理的参与者也更有可能实现连续 3 周或以上的戒除(OR=8.07;95%CI[2.48, 26.24]),实现更长的戒除持续时间(B=2.14;95%CI[0.67, 3.61]),提交更高比例的阴性尿液检测(B=19.85;95%CI[6.89, 32.82]),以及更长时间保留在治疗中(B=3.00;95%CI[1.04, 4.97]),与仅接受 URH 治疗的参与者相比(所有 p<0.01)。
将条件强化管理纳入其中,可有效促进可卡因戒除和治疗保留。大规模推广条件强化管理可能是治疗巴西可卡因使用障碍患者的有效策略。