Dailey Hannah L, Schwarzenberg Peter, Webb Iii Edmund B, Boran Sinead A M, Guerin Shane, Harty James A
Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Ireland.
Bone Jt Open. 2021 Oct;2(10):825-833. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0121.R1.
The study objective was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for a pilot cohort of tibial shaft fractures treated with a new tibial nailing system that produces controlled axial interfragmentary micromotion. The hypothesis was that axial micromotion enhances fracture healing compared to static interlocking.
Patients were treated in a single level I trauma centre over a 2.5-year period. Group allocation was not randomized; both the micromotion nail and standard-of-care static locking nails (control group) were commercially available and selected at the discretion of the treating surgeons. Injury risk levels were quantified using the Nonunion Risk Determination (NURD) score. Radiological healing was assessed until 24 weeks or clinical union. Low-dose CT scans were acquired at 12 weeks and virtual mechanical testing was performed to objectively assess structural bone healing.
A total of 37 micromotion patients and 46 control patients were evaluated. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, sex, the proportion of open fractures, or NURD score. There were no nonunions (0%) in the micromotion group versus five (11%) in the control group. The proportion of fractures united was significantly higher in the micromotion group compared to control at 12 weeks (54% vs 30% united; p = 0.043), 18 weeks (81% vs 59%; p = 0.034), and 24 weeks (97% vs 74%; p = 0.005). Structural bone healing scores as assessed by CT scans tended to be higher with micromotion compared to control and this difference reached significance in patients who had biological comorbidities such as smoking.
In this pilot study, micromotion fixation was associated with improved healing compared to standard tibial nailing. Further prospective clinical studies will be needed to assess the strength and generalizability of any potential benefits of micromotion fixation. Cite this article: 2021;2(10):825-833.
本研究的目的是前瞻性评估使用一种新型胫骨髓内钉系统治疗胫骨干骨折的试点队列的临床结果,该系统可产生可控的轴向骨折块间微动。假设是与静态交锁相比,轴向微动可促进骨折愈合。
在一个一级创伤中心对患者进行了为期2.5年的治疗。分组并非随机进行;微动髓内钉和标准治疗的静态锁定髓内钉(对照组)均可商购,由治疗外科医生自行选择。使用骨不连风险判定(NURD)评分对损伤风险水平进行量化。评估直至24周或临床愈合的放射学愈合情况。在12周时进行低剂量CT扫描,并进行虚拟力学测试以客观评估骨结构愈合情况。
共评估了37例接受微动治疗的患者和46例对照患者。两组在年龄、性别、开放性骨折比例或NURD评分方面无显著差异。微动组无骨不连(0%),而对照组有5例(11%)。在12周时,微动组骨折愈合的比例显著高于对照组(愈合率分别为54%和30%;p = 0.043),18周时(81%对59%;p = 0.034)和24周时(97%对74%;p = 0.005)。与对照组相比,通过CT扫描评估的微动组骨结构愈合评分往往更高,并且在有吸烟等生物学合并症的患者中,这种差异具有统计学意义。
在这项试点研究中,与标准胫骨髓内钉固定相比,微动固定与更好的愈合相关。需要进一步的前瞻性临床研究来评估微动固定任何潜在益处的强度和普遍性。引用本文:2021;2(10):825 - 833。