Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
iBRAIN: International Institute for the Brain, Physical Therapy Department, New York, NY, USA.
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2021 Oct 7;7(1):94. doi: 10.1038/s41394-021-00454-x.
An ambulatory elder with SCI, AIS C, balance deficits, and right ankle-foot-orthosis participated. RobUST-intervention comprised six 90 min-sessions of postural tasks with pelvic assistance and trunk perturbations. We collected three baselines and two 1 week post-training assessments-after the first four sessions (PT1) and after the last two sessions (PT2). We measured Berg Balance Scale (BBS), four-stage balance test (4SBT)-including a 30 s-window with and without vision-standing workspace area, and reactive balance (measured as body weight%). Kinematics, center-of-pressure (COP), and electromyography (EMG) were analyzed to compute root-mean-square-COP (RMS-COP), the margin of stability (MoS), ankle range of motion, and integrated EMG (iEMG) normalized to baseline. The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (BRPE), and change in the Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) compared with baseline were collected to address training tolerance. A 2SD-bandwidth method was selected for data interpretation. The maximum BBS was achieved (1-point improvement). In the 4SBT, the participant completed 30 s (baseline = 20 s) with reduced balance variability during semi-tandem position without vision (RMS-COP baseline = 50.32 ± 2 SD = 19.64 mm; PT1 = 21.29 mm; PT2 = 19.34 mm). A trend toward increase was found in workspace area (baseline = 996 ± 359 cm; PT1 = 1539 cm; PT2 = 1138 cm). The participant tolerated higher perturbation intensities (baseline mean = 25%body weight, PT2 mean = 44% body weight), and on average improved his MoS (3 cm), ankle range of motion (4°), and gluteus medius activity (iEMG = 10). RobuST-intervention was moderate-sort of hard (BRPE = 3-4). A substantial reduction in MAP (9%) and HR (30%) were observed. In conclusion, RobUST-intervention might be effective in ambulatory SCI.
一位患有 SCI(脊髓损伤)、AIS C 级、平衡能力受损且右脚踝足矫形器的可移动老年人参与了该研究。RobUST 干预包括 6 次 90 分钟的姿势任务,包括骨盆辅助和躯干扰动。我们收集了三个基线和两个训练后一周的评估(PT1 和 PT2),分别在第 4 次治疗后和最后 2 次治疗后。我们测量了 Berg 平衡量表(BBS)、四阶段平衡测试(4SBT)——包括 30 秒窗口(有和没有视觉的站立工作空间)和反应性平衡(以身体重量%表示)。分析运动学、中心压力(COP)和肌电图(EMG),以计算均方根 COP(RMS-COP)、稳定性边界(MoS)、踝关节活动范围和整合 EMG(iEMG)相对于基线的归一化值。收集 Borg 感知用力等级(BRPE)和平均动脉压(MAP)及心率(HR)与基线相比的变化,以评估训练耐受性。选择 2SD 带宽方法进行数据解释。最大 BBS 得分提高(增加 1 分)。在 4SBT 中,参与者在半串联位置(无视觉)下完成 30 秒(基线=20 秒),平衡变异性降低(RMS-COP 基线=50.32±2SD=19.64mm;PT1=21.29mm;PT2=19.34mm)。工作空间面积呈增加趋势(基线=996±359cm;PT1=1539cm;PT2=1138cm)。参与者耐受更高的扰动强度(基线平均=25%体重,PT2 平均=44%体重),平均改善了他的 MoS(3cm)、踝关节活动范围(4°)和臀中肌活动(iEMG=10)。RobuST 干预属于中等强度(BRPE=3-4)。MAP(9%)和 HR(30%)显著降低。总之,RobUST 干预可能对可移动的 SCI 患者有效。