Suppr超能文献

随机临床试验:7 天 vonoprazan 为基础与 14 天奥美拉唑为基础的三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌。

Randomized clinical trial: 7-day vonoprazan-based versus 14-day omeprazole-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;36(12):3308-3313. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15700. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Vonoprazan has more potent and sustained acid inhibitory effects than proton pump inhibitors; therefore, Helicobacter pylori eradication rates are expected to improve with the use of vonoprazan-based regimens. To date, no randomized trial has compared the efficacy of 7-day vonoprazan-based triple therapy (7-VAC) with 14-day omeprazole-based triple therapy (14-OAC). This study aimed to compare the H. pylori eradication rates of 7-VAC and 14-OAC.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial was performed at a tertiary hospital in Bangkok. Patients with active H. pylori infection who were naive to treatment were included and randomized (1:1) into either a 7-VAC group (vonoprazan 20 mg bid. pc., amoxicillin 1000 mg bid. pc., and clarithromycin 500 mg bid. pc.) or a 14-OAC group (omeprazole 20 mg bid. ac., amoxicillin 1000 mg bid. pc., and clarithromycin 500 mg bid. pc.). Eradication success was evaluated by urea breath test 4-6 weeks after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 122 subjects were randomized to receive 7-VAC (n = 61) or 14-OAC (n = 61). The H. pylori eradication rates of the 7-VAC and 14-OAC groups were 96.7% and 88.5% (P = 0.083), respectively, by intention-to-treat analysis and 98.3% and 93.1% (P = 0.159), respectively, by per-protocol analysis. All treatment-related adverse events were mild and not significantly different between the two groups. Common side effects included bitter taste, nausea, and dizziness.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-VAC regimen was well tolerated and achieved similar eradication rates and side effects to those of 14-OAC; therefore, 7-VAC may be considered an alternative regimen for H. pylori treatment with the benefit of shorter duration.

摘要

背景与目的

沃诺拉赞具有比质子泵抑制剂更强且持续的抑酸作用;因此,预计使用沃诺拉赞为基础的治疗方案可提高幽门螺杆菌的根除率。迄今为止,尚无随机试验比较 7 天沃诺拉赞三联疗法(7-VAC)与 14 天奥美拉唑三联疗法(14-OAC)的疗效。本研究旨在比较 7-VAC 和 14-OAC 的幽门螺杆菌根除率。

方法

本随机临床试验在曼谷的一家三级医院进行。纳入初治的幽门螺杆菌感染活动期患者,并按 1:1 比例随机分为 7-VAC 组(沃诺拉赞 20mg,bid. pc.,阿莫西林 1000mg,bid. pc.,克拉霉素 500mg,bid. pc.)或 14-OAC 组(奥美拉唑 20mg,bid. ac.,阿莫西林 1000mg,bid. pc.,克拉霉素 500mg,bid. pc.)。治疗结束后 4-6 周通过尿素呼气试验评估根除成功。

结果

共有 122 名患者被随机分配接受 7-VAC(n=61)或 14-OAC(n=61)治疗。意向治疗分析显示,7-VAC 组和 14-OAC 组的幽门螺杆菌根除率分别为 96.7%和 88.5%(P=0.083),按方案分析分别为 98.3%和 93.1%(P=0.159)。所有与治疗相关的不良事件均为轻度,两组间无显著差异。常见的副作用包括口苦、恶心和头晕。

结论

7-VAC 方案耐受性良好,其根除率和副作用与 14-OAC 相当;因此,7-VAC 可能是一种替代幽门螺杆菌治疗方案,具有较短疗程的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验