• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 vonoprazan 的治疗与基于质子泵抑制剂的治疗在幽门螺杆菌感染患者中的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Vonoprazan-based therapies versus PPI-based therapies in patients with H. pylori infection: Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Institute of Therapeutic Innovations and Outcomes (ITIO), College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Helicobacter. 2024 May-Jun;29(3):e13094. doi: 10.1111/hel.13094.

DOI:10.1111/hel.13094
PMID:38790090
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA), vonoprazan-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (VAC), vonoprazan-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (VBQT), and PPI-based triple (PAC) or quadruple therapy (PBQT) for H. pylori infection with the consideration of duration of therapy and amoxicillin dose (H: high; L: low).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to December 15, 2023. The efficacy outcome was eradication rate, and safety outcomes included the rates of adverse events and treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven RCTs were included. The pooled eradication rates were 82.8% for VA, 89.1% for VAC, and 91.8% for VBQT, which increased with the higher amoxicillin frequency of administration and extended duration of therapy within each regimen. There were no significant differences in eradication rate when comparing 7-VA versus 7-VAC and 14-VA versus 14-VAC. VA was at least comparable to PAC. The eradication rate did not differ significantly between 10-H-VA or 14-H-VA versus 14-PBQT. 7-L-VAC demonstrated higher eradication rate versus 7-PAC and comparable rate to 14-PAC. 14-VBQT showed higher eradication rates versus 14-PBQT. The adverse events rate was 19.3% for VA, 30.6% for VAC, and 38.4% for VBQT. VA had similar risk of adverse events versus VAC and significantly fewer adverse events compared to PBQT. The treatment discontinuation rate did not differ significantly between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The eradication rate of VBQT was the highest at above 90% followed by VAC and VA. VA was as effective as VAC and superior to PPI-based therapies with favorable safety, highlighting the potential of VA therapy as a promising alternative to traditional PPI-based therapies. VPZ-based triple or quadruple therapies was more effective than PPI-based therapies. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment regimen especially in the western countries.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估沃诺拉赞-阿莫西林(VA)、沃诺拉赞-阿莫西林-克拉霉素(VAC)、沃诺拉赞为基础的含铋四联疗法(VBQT)和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)为基础的三联(PAC)或四联(PBQT)疗法治疗 H. pylori 感染的疗效和安全性,并考虑了治疗持续时间和阿莫西林剂量(H:高;L:低)。

材料和方法

截至 2023 年 12 月 15 日,我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库中检索了合格的随机对照试验(RCT)。疗效结局为根除率,安全性结局包括不良事件发生率和治疗中断率。

结果

共纳入 27 项 RCT。VA、VAC 和 VBQT 的总体根除率分别为 82.8%、89.1%和 91.8%,且随着每种方案中阿莫西林给药频率的增加和治疗持续时间的延长而增加。7-VA 与 7-VAC 和 14-VA 与 14-VAC 相比,根除率无显著差异。VA 与 PAC 至少相当。10-H-VA 或 14-H-VA 与 14-PBQT 相比,根除率无显著差异。7-L-VAC 的根除率高于 7-PAC,与 14-PAC 相当。14-VBQT 的根除率高于 14-PBQT。VA 的不良事件发生率为 19.3%,VAC 为 30.6%,VBQT 为 38.4%。VA 的不良事件风险与 VAC 相似,且明显低于 PBQT。各治疗组间的治疗中断率无显著差异。

结论

VBQT 的根除率最高,超过 90%,其次是 VAC 和 VA。VA 与 VAC 同样有效,且优于 PPI 为基础的治疗方法,安全性良好,突显了 VA 治疗作为传统 PPI 为基础的治疗方法的替代方案的潜力。VPZ 为基础的三联或四联疗法比 PPI 为基础的疗法更有效。需要进一步的研究来确定最佳的治疗方案,特别是在西方国家。

相似文献

1
Vonoprazan-based therapies versus PPI-based therapies in patients with H. pylori infection: Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.基于 vonoprazan 的治疗与基于质子泵抑制剂的治疗在幽门螺杆菌感染患者中的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Helicobacter. 2024 May-Jun;29(3):e13094. doi: 10.1111/hel.13094.
2
Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication.幽门螺杆菌根除治疗方案的最佳疗程
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 11;2013(12):CD008337. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008337.pub2.
3
Efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan-based treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于 Vonoprazan 的幽门螺杆菌感染治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):953. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09885-x.
4
Sequential versus standard triple first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.用于根除幽门螺杆菌的序贯疗法与标准三联一线疗法对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 28;2016(6):CD009034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009034.pub2.
5
Low-dose or high-dose amoxicillin in vonoprazan-based dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication? A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于 vonoprazan 的双联疗法中低剂量或高剂量阿莫西林用于幽门螺杆菌根除?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Helicobacter. 2024 Jan-Feb;29(1):e13054. doi: 10.1111/hel.13054.
6
Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan and high-dose amoxicillin dual therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Vonoprazan 与高剂量阿莫西林双联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效与安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2024 Nov;64(5):107331. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107331. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
7
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers and Proton Pump Inhibitors for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.比较钾竞争性酸阻滞剂和质子泵抑制剂作为一线幽门螺杆菌根除治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Helicobacter. 2024 Nov-Dec;29(6):e13150. doi: 10.1111/hel.13150.
8
Systematic review with meta-analysis: Vonoprazan, a potent acid blocker, is superior to proton-pump inhibitors for eradication of clarithromycin-resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori.系统评价与荟萃分析:强效酸抑制剂——沃诺拉赞优于质子泵抑制剂,可根除克拉霉素耐药的幽门螺杆菌菌株。
Helicobacter. 2018 Aug;23(4):e12495. doi: 10.1111/hel.12495. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
9
The efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and meta-analysis.vonoprazan-阿莫西林双联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Aug 7;28(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01249-6.
10
Effects of amoxicillin dosage on cure rate, gut microbiota, and antibiotic resistome in vonoprazan and amoxicillin dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.阿莫西林剂量对伏诺拉生和阿莫西林联合治疗幽门螺杆菌的治愈率、肠道微生物群及抗生素耐药组的影响:一项多中心、开放标签、非劣效性随机对照试验
Lancet Microbe. 2025 Mar;6(3):100975. doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.100975. Epub 2024 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress of potassium-competitive acid blockers in the treatment of .钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂在治疗方面的研究进展 。(原文句子不完整,翻译可能不太准确,完整准确的翻译需结合完整原文)
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2544886. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2544886. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
2
Efficacy and safety of triple therapy with vonoprazan for eradication: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial.沃克三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效与安全性:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 28;31(28):109001. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i28.109001.
3
First-Line Prescriptions and Effectiveness of Eradication Treatment in Ireland over a 10-Year Period: Data from the European Registry on Management (Hp-EuReg).
爱尔兰10年间根除治疗的一线处方及有效性:来自欧洲管理登记处(Hp-EuReg)的数据
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jul 5;14(7):680. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14070680.
4
Comparison of tegoprazan-based and proton pump inhibitor-based regimens for eradication: a meta-analysis and systematic review.基于替戈拉赞和基于质子泵抑制剂的根除方案比较:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 18;12:1580203. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1580203. eCollection 2025.
5
Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy versus bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for patients with infection: a meta-analysis.沃克酰胺-阿莫西林双重疗法与含铋四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌感染患者的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1561749. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1561749. eCollection 2025.
6
Overcoming antibiotic-resistant infection: Current challenges and emerging approaches.克服抗生素耐药性感染:当前挑战与新出现的方法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 14;31(10):102289. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i10.102289.
7
Real-world evidence on the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy for treatment in elderly patients.沃克酰胺-阿莫西林双重疗法治疗老年患者的疗效和安全性的真实世界证据。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 7;31(1):101463. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i1.101463.
8
resistance in Hainan Province, China: investigating phenotypes and genotypes through whole-genome sequencing.中国海南省的耐药性:通过全基因组测序研究表型和基因型。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Dec 17;14:1505166. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1505166. eCollection 2024.
9
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-Guided Eradication Therapy in the Southeast Region of China: A Retrospective Study.中国东南部地区抗菌药物敏感性试验指导下的根除治疗:一项回顾性研究
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Nov 16;17:5079-5086. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S487503. eCollection 2024.
10
Antibiotic Susceptibility-Guided Concomitant Therapy Regimen with Vonoprazan, High-Dose Amoxicillin, Clarithromycin, and Metronidazole for Eradication as Fourth-Line Regimen: An Interventional Study.以沃克帕唑、大剂量阿莫西林、克拉霉素和甲硝唑为根除治疗的四线方案的抗生素敏感性指导的联合治疗方案:一项干预性研究。
Microorganisms. 2024 Oct 21;12(10):2104. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12102104.