Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kornel Gibiński University Clinical Center, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kornel Gibiński University Clinical Center, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2022 Jan 28;132(1). doi: 10.20452/pamw.16109. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
Endoscopic plastic biliary stenting has been used for more than 30 years as a temporary or definitive treatment of benign and malignant neoplasms. These stents are commonly available, inexpensive, and easy to implant.
We aimed to evaluate the duration of plastic stent patency, to assess complications associated with stent use, and to determine the optimal timing of stent replacement depending on the indication for biliary stenting.
This was a retrospective cohort study with a 5‑year follow‑up including patients who underwent plastic biliary stent implantation between 2012 and 2013 in a tertiary referral gastroenterological center. The performance of stents was assessed on the basis of medical records, direct contact with patients or their family members, and information derived from the national death registry.
We assessed 830 biliary stenting procedures performed in 346 patients. The indications for biliary stenting included choledocholithiasis in 120 patients (34.7%), benign stricture in 70 patients (20.2%), and malignant stricture in 156 patients (45.1%). The mean duration of stent patency for these conditions was 110, 106, and 55 days, respectively (P <0.001). Stents implanted for malignant perihilar strictures had a shorter duration of patency than those used for distal strictures (40 days vs 76 days, P = 0.002).
The patency of plastic stents depends on the underlying disease. In patients with benign biliary disease, stent replacement is recommended after about 3.5 months. In patients with cancer, the timing of stent replacement should be guided by survival prognosis and location of stricture.
内镜下塑料胆道支架置入术作为一种临时或永久的治疗方法,已在良性和恶性肿瘤的治疗中应用了 30 多年。这些支架通常价格低廉,易于植入。
我们旨在评估塑料支架通畅的持续时间,评估与支架使用相关的并发症,并根据胆道支架置入的适应证确定支架更换的最佳时机。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,随访时间为 5 年,纳入了 2012 年至 2013 年期间在一家三级转诊胃肠病学中心接受塑料胆道支架植入术的患者。支架的性能是基于病历、与患者或其家属的直接联系以及国家死亡登记处的信息来评估的。
我们评估了 346 例患者的 830 例胆道支架置入术。胆道支架置入的适应证包括胆总管结石 120 例(34.7%)、良性狭窄 70 例(20.2%)和恶性狭窄 156 例(45.1%)。这些情况下支架通畅的平均持续时间分别为 110、106 和 55 天(P<0.001)。用于恶性肝门周围狭窄的支架通畅时间短于用于远端狭窄的支架(40 天比 76 天,P=0.002)。
塑料支架的通畅性取决于基础疾病。对于良性胆道疾病患者,建议在大约 3.5 个月后更换支架。对于癌症患者,支架更换的时机应根据生存预后和狭窄部位来指导。