Suppr超能文献

使用西洛他唑的双重抗血小板疗法治疗卒中和颅内动脉狭窄患者。

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Using Cilostazol in Patients With Stroke and Intracranial Arterial Stenosis.

机构信息

International University of Health and Welfare Tokyo Japan.

National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Osaka Japan.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):e022575. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022575. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

Abstract

Background Long-term benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) over single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) for the prevention of recurrent stroke has not been established in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis. We compared the efficacy and safety of DAPT with cilostazol and clopidogrel or aspirin to those of SAPT with clopidogrel or aspirin in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis, who were recruited to the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination trial, a randomized controlled trial in high-risk Japanese patients with ischemic stroke. Methods and Results We compared the vascular and hemorrhagic events between DAPT and SAPT in patients with ischemic stroke and symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis of at least 50% in a major intracranial artery. Patients were placed in two groups: 275 were assigned to receive DAPT and 272 patients SAPT. The risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.95); and composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.91) were lower in DAPT than SAPT, whereas the risk of severe or life-threatening bleeding (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.12-4.30) did not differ between the 2 treatment groups. Conclusions DAPT using cilostazol was superior to SAPT with clopidogrel or aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke and vascular events without increasing bleeding risk among patients with intracranial arterial stenosis after stroke. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01995370.

摘要

背景

对于颅内动脉狭窄患者,尚未确定双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)相对于单药抗血小板治疗(SAPT)在预防复发性卒中方面的长期获益。我们比较了颅内动脉狭窄患者中 DAPT(西洛他唑联合氯吡格雷或阿司匹林)与 SAPT(氯吡格雷或阿司匹林)的疗效和安全性,这些患者被纳入 Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination 试验,这是一项在日本缺血性卒中高危患者中进行的随机对照试验。

方法和结果

我们比较了 DAPT 和 SAPT 在缺血性卒中和至少有 50%颅内主要动脉狭窄的症状性或无症状性颅内动脉狭窄患者中的血管和出血事件。患者分为两组:275 例患者接受 DAPT,272 例患者接受 SAPT。DAPT 组缺血性卒中和复合终点(卒中、心肌梗死和血管性死亡)的风险低于 SAPT 组(风险比 [HR],0.47;95%置信区间 [CI],0.23-0.95;HR,0.48;95%CI,0.26-0.91),但严重或威胁生命的出血风险(HR,0.72;95%CI,0.12-4.30)在两组之间无差异。

结论

在颅内动脉狭窄的卒中患者中,与 SAPT(氯吡格雷或阿司匹林)相比,DAPT(西洛他唑联合氯吡格雷或阿司匹林)更有利于预防复发性卒中及血管事件,且不增加出血风险。

注册网址

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT01995370。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5398/8751870/e3d0c17ee336/JAH3-10-e022575-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验