• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较经尿道中段吊带术和聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶术后压力性尿失禁再次手术的风险。

Comparing risk of repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence after mid-urethral slings and polyacrylamide hydrogel.

作者信息

Svenningsen Rune, Oversand Sissel Hegdahl, Schiøtz Hjalmar August, Kulseng-Hanssen Sigurd

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Dec;100(12):2186-2192. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14271. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.14271
PMID:34622944
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Over the last two decades synthetic mid-urethral slings (MUS) have become established as the main surgical method for correcting stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, transurethral injections with polyacrylamide hydrogel are gaining popularity. We used surgical codes from a national registry to explore potential differences in risk of later surgery for SUI comparing retropubic slings, obturator slings, and polyacrylamide hydrogel injections.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This cohort study used surgical codes from The Norwegian Patient Registry. All women recorded as having had surgery for SUI coded as retropubic sling, obturator sling, or polyacrylamide hydrogel injection from 2008 until end-of-study censoring in 2017, were included. Main outcome was time to any recorded new SUI procedure later in the study period. Unadjusted comparison between groups was done using Kaplan-Meier. A Cox regression analysis was then performed to adjust for hospital unit size and patient age at surgery.

RESULTS

The unadjusted analyses showed significant differences between the chosen index method and the risk of later SUI surgery favoring retropubic slings (p < 0.01). The proportions of patients without any recorded new SUI procedure at 1 and 5 years were 99.3% and 97.7% for retropubic MUS, 98.7% and 96.1% for obturator MUS, and 82.7% and 72.4% for polyacrylamide hydrogel injections. The majority of women having a repeat procedure for SUI after a polyacrylamide hydrogel injection underwent repeat treatment within 1 year (63%). After adjusting for age at time of surgery and hospital size, obturator slings (hazard ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.4) and polyacrylamide hydrogel (hazard ratio 23.1, 95% CI 17.6-30.3) remained associated with a higher risk of later incontinence surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Both retropubic and obturator slings have low long-term risks of repeat incontinence surgery compared with polyacrylamide hydrogel injections. Retropubic slings were found to have superior longevity of the surgical result.

摘要

引言

在过去二十年中,合成尿道中段吊带术(MUS)已成为治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)的主要手术方法。然而,聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶经尿道注射正越来越受欢迎。我们使用了国家登记处的手术编码,以探讨耻骨后吊带术、闭孔吊带术和聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶注射术在SUI后续手术风险方面的潜在差异。

材料与方法

这项队列研究使用了挪威患者登记处的手术编码。纳入了2008年至2017年研究结束时所有记录为接受过SUI手术的女性,手术编码为耻骨后吊带术、闭孔吊带术或聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶注射术。主要结局是在研究期间后续记录的任何新的SUI手术的时间。使用Kaplan-Meier进行组间未调整比较。然后进行Cox回归分析,以调整医院单位规模和手术时的患者年龄。

结果

未调整分析显示,所选的索引方法与后续SUI手术风险之间存在显著差异,耻骨后吊带术更具优势(p < 0.01)。耻骨后MUS在1年和5年时无任何记录的新SUI手术的患者比例分别为99.3%和97.7%,闭孔MUS为98.7%和96.1%,聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶注射为82.7%和72.4%。大多数在聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶注射后因SUI进行重复手术的女性在1年内接受了重复治疗(63%)。在调整手术时的年龄和医院规模后,闭孔吊带术(风险比1.8,95%可信区间1.4 - 2.4)和聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶(风险比23.1,95%可信区间17.6 - 30.3)仍然与更高的后续尿失禁手术风险相关。

结论

与聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶注射相比,耻骨后吊带术和闭孔吊带术的长期重复尿失禁手术风险较低。发现耻骨后吊带术的手术效果持久性更佳。

相似文献

1
Comparing risk of repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence after mid-urethral slings and polyacrylamide hydrogel.比较经尿道中段吊带术和聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶术后压力性尿失禁再次手术的风险。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Dec;100(12):2186-2192. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14271. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的经尿道中段吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.
3
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
4
Reoperation for Urinary Incontinence After Retropubic and Transobturator Sling Procedures.经耻骨后和经闭孔吊带手术后尿失禁的再次手术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;134(2):333-342. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003356.
5
Reoperation for urinary incontinence: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007.再次手术治疗尿失禁:1998-2007 年全国队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):263.e1-263.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.069. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
6
Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.压力性尿失禁女性的外科治疗:ESTER系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(14):1-306. doi: 10.3310/hta23140.
7
Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis.女性压力性尿失禁的吊带手术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;211(1):71.e1-71.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.030. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
8
Post-operative tension adjustment-A simple technical modification in mid-urethral slings (MUS) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).术后张力调整——一种用于治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)的经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术(MUS)的简单技术改良。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 May;260:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
9
Midterm postoperative results of mid-urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures.经尿道中段吊带术的中期术后结果。超声在解释手术失败中的作用。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Nov;41(8):1834-1843. doi: 10.1002/nau.25032. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
10
Long-term re-procedure rate after mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence.经尿道中段吊带治疗压力性尿失禁后的长期再治疗率。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Apr;31(4):727-735. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04223-1. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Tension-Free Vaginal Tape versus Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Bulking Agent for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Patient Choice and Outcomes in Finland.无张力阴道吊带与聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶填充剂治疗压力性尿失禁:芬兰的患者选择与治疗结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Apr;36(4):895-902. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06119-9. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
2
Current Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence by Bulking Agents and Laser Therapy-An Update.填充剂和激光疗法治疗压力性尿失禁的现状——最新进展
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 28;13(5):1377. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051377.
3
Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape in stress urinary incontinence.
经阴道无张力吊带术与经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的前瞻性随机对照研究的长期结果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Sep;34(9):2249-2256. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05527-z. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
4
Identification of potential associated factors for stress urinary incontinence in women: a retrospective study.女性压力性尿失禁潜在相关因素的识别:一项回顾性研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):965. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3539.