Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, University School of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Jan;23(1):165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.08.044. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
Risk stratification tools are useful to provide appropriate clinical care for older patients with pneumonia. This study aimed to compare a Frailty Index (FI) with pneumonia severity measures, CURB-65, and the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), for predicting mortality and persistent disability after pneumonia.
Single-center prospective cohort study.
The study included 190 patients aged ≥65 years who were hospitalized with pneumonia at a university hospital in Korea between October 2019 and September 2020.
At admission, a 50-item deficit-accumulation FI (range: 0-1), CURB-65 (range: 0-5), and PSI (range: 0-395) scores were calculated. The outcomes were death and a composite outcome of death or decline in ability to perform daily activities and physical task 6 months later.
The median age was 79 years (interquartile range: 74-85), and 70 (36.8%) patients were women. The patients who died (n = 53) had higher FI (median, 0.46 vs 0.20; P < .011), CURB-65 score (median, 3 vs 2; P = .001), and PSI score (median, 149 vs 116; P < .001) than those who did not. The C-statistics (95% confidence intervals) for 6-month mortality were 0.69 (0.61-0.77) for the FI, 0.62 (0.53-0.71) for CURB-65, and 0.71 (0.62-0.79) for the PSI (P = .019). The C-statistics for the 6-month composite outcome were 0.73 (0.65-0.81) for the FI, 0.64 (0.55-0.73) for CURB-65, and 0.69 (0.60-0.77) for the PSI (P = .096). The C-statistics improved when the FI was added to CURB-65 (from 0.64 to 0.74; P = .003) and to the PSI (from 0.69 to 0.75; P = .044) for the composite outcome.
Measuring frailty provides additive value to widely used pneumonia severity measures in predicting death or persistent hospitalization-associated disability in older adults after pneumonia hospitalization. Early recognition of frailty may be useful to identify those who require in-hospital and post-acute care interventions for functional recovery.
风险分层工具对于为老年肺炎患者提供适当的临床护理非常有用。本研究旨在比较衰弱指数(FI)与肺炎严重程度评估工具 CURB-65、PSI,以预测肺炎后死亡和持续残疾的发生。
单中心前瞻性队列研究。
该研究纳入了 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 9 月期间在韩国一所大学医院因肺炎住院的 190 名年龄≥65 岁的患者。
入院时计算 50 项缺陷累积 FI(范围:0-1)、CURB-65(范围:0-5)和 PSI(范围:0-395)评分。主要结局为死亡和 6 个月后死亡或日常生活活动能力下降及不能完成日常身体任务的复合结局。
中位年龄为 79 岁(四分位距:74-85),70 名(36.8%)患者为女性。死亡患者(n=53)的 FI(中位数,0.46 比 0.20;P<.011)、CURB-65 评分(中位数,3 比 2;P=0.001)和 PSI 评分(中位数,149 比 116;P<.001)均高于未死亡患者。FI、CURB-65 和 PSI 预测 6 个月死亡率的 C 统计量(95%置信区间)分别为 0.69(0.61-0.77)、0.62(0.53-0.71)和 0.71(0.62-0.79)(P=0.019)。FI、CURB-65 和 PSI 预测 6 个月复合结局的 C 统计量分别为 0.73(0.65-0.81)、0.64(0.55-0.73)和 0.69(0.60-0.77)(P=0.096)。当 FI 与 CURB-65(从 0.64 增加至 0.74;P=0.003)和 PSI(从 0.69 增加至 0.75;P=0.044)联合评估时,预测复合结局的 C 统计量得到改善。
测量衰弱程度可增加常用肺炎严重程度评估工具在预测老年肺炎患者住院后死亡或持续与住院相关残疾方面的预测价值。早期识别衰弱可能有助于识别那些需要住院和急性后护理干预以恢复功能的患者。