Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Yang and Yamazaki Environment and Energy Building, 473 Via Ortega, Office 161, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1701 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 8;21(1):1812. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11824-3.
Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions frequently assume that students who learn positive WASH behaviors will disseminate this information to their families. This is most prominent in school-based programs, which rely on students to act as "agents of change" to translate impact from school to home. However, there is little evidence to support or contradict this assumption.
We conducted a quasi-experimental, prospective cohort study in 12 schools in rural, southern Zambia to measure the impact of WASH UP!, a school-based WASH program designed by the creators of Sesame Street. WASH UP! is an educational program that uses stories and interactive games to teach students in grades 1-4 about healthy behaviors, such as washing hands and using the latrine. We completed in-person interviews with grade 1 and 4 students (N = 392 and 369, respectively), their teachers (N = 24) and caregivers (N = 729) using structured surveys containing both open- and closed-ended questions. We measured changes in knowledge and whether students reported sharing WASH-related messages learned in school with their caregivers at home.
Student knowledge increased significantly, but primarily among students in grade 1. Overall rates of students reporting that they shared messages from the curriculum with their caregivers rose from 7 to 23% (p < 0.001). Students in grade 4 were 5.2 times as likely as those in grade 1 to report sharing a WASH-related message with their caregivers (ARR = 5.2, 95% C.I. = (2.3, 8.9); p < 0.001).
Although we measured only modest levels of student dissemination of WASH UP! messages from the school to the home, students in grade 4 showed significantly more promise as agents of change than those in grade 1. Future work should prioritize developing curricula that reflect the variability in needs, capabilities and support in the home and community among primary school students rather than a single approach for a wide range of ages and contexts.
水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)干预措施通常假设,学习积极的 WASH 行为的学生将把这些信息传播给他们的家人。这在以学校为基础的方案中最为明显,这些方案依赖于学生充当“变革推动者”,将影响从学校转化为家庭。然而,几乎没有证据支持或反驳这一假设。
我们在赞比亚南部农村的 12 所学校进行了一项准实验性、前瞻性队列研究,以衡量由芝麻街的创作者设计的以学校为基础的 WASH UP! 方案的影响。WASH UP! 是一个教育方案,使用故事和互动游戏来教导 1-4 年级的学生健康行为,如洗手和使用厕所。我们使用包含开放式和封闭式问题的结构化调查,对 1 年级和 4 年级学生(分别为 392 名和 369 名)、他们的教师(24 名)和照顾者(729 名)进行了面对面访谈。我们测量了知识的变化情况,以及学生是否报告在家里与照顾者分享了在学校学到的与 WASH 相关的信息。
学生的知识水平显著提高,但主要是在 1 年级学生中。报告与照顾者分享课程信息的学生比例从 7%上升到 23%(p<0.001)。与 1 年级学生相比,4 年级学生更有可能与照顾者分享与 WASH 相关的信息(ARR=5.2,95%置信区间=(2.3,8.9);p<0.001)。
尽管我们只测量了学生从学校向家庭传播 WASH UP! 信息的适度水平,但与 1 年级学生相比,4 年级学生作为变革推动者表现出了更大的潜力。未来的工作应优先制定反映小学生家庭和社区中需求、能力和支持差异的课程,而不是针对广泛的年龄和背景采用单一方法。