The role of dual energy computed tomography in the differentiation of acute gout flares and acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the diagnostic impact of dual energy computed tomography (DECT) in acute gout flares and acute calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystal arthritis when compared to the gold standard of arthrocentesis with compensated polarised light microscopy. Microscopy results were also compared to musculoskeletal ultrasound (MUS), conventional radiographs, and the suspected clinical diagnosis (SCD).

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with a suspected gout flare (n = 24) or acute CPP crystal arthritis (n = 11, n = 1 suffered from neither) who received a DECT and underwent arthrocentesis were included. Two independent readers assessed DECT images for signs of monosodium urate crystals or calcium pyrophosphate deposition.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of DECT for gout was 63% (95% CI 0.41-0.81) with a specificity of 92% (0.41-0.81) while sensitivity and specificity for acute CPP arthritis were 55% (0.23-0.83) and 92% (0.74-0.99), respectively. MUS had the highest sensitivity of all imaging modalities with 92% (0.73-0.99) and a specificity of 83% (0.52-0.98) for gout, while sensitivity and specificity for acute CPP crystal arthritis were 91% (0.59-1.00) and 92% (0.74-0.99), respectively.

CONCLUSION

DECT is an adequate non-invasive diagnostic tool for acute gout flares but might have a lower sensitivity than described by previous studies. Both MUS and SCD had higher sensitivities than DECT for acute gout flares and acute CPP crystal arthritis.