文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣表型对中度主动脉瓣狭窄和升主动脉扩张进展的预后意义。

Prognostic Implications of Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve Phenotype on Progression of Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Ascending Aorta Dilatation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2021 Dec 15;161:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.08.050. Epub 2021 Oct 6.


DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.08.050
PMID:34627597
Abstract

Studies on the impact of aortic valve anatomy (bicuspid aortic valve [BAV] or tricuspid aortic valve [TAV]) on the progression of moderate aortic stenosis (AS) and ascending aorta (AA) dilatation and its prognostic implications are limited. From 1991 to 2016, 288 asymptomatic patients with moderate AS detected during index echocardiography with at least 1 year of echocardiographic follow-up were retrospectively studied. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were compared between patients with BAV (n = 80) and patients with TAV (n = 208). Co-primary outcomes were 1-year hemodynamic and anatomic progression of AS and AA dilatation. Secondary end points were the incidence of AA rapid progressors, all-cause mortality, aortic valve replacement, and congestive heart failure. Determinants of AS progression, AA diameters, AA dilatation, and prognostic outcomes were evaluated. Similar 1-year progression of the aortic valve peak velocity, V (9 ± 18 vs 9 ± 23 cm/s), mean gradient (1.5 ± 2.3 vs 1.3 ± 3.2 mm Hg), and aortic valve area (AVA) (-0.04 ± 0.09 vs -0.05 ± 0.10 cm) were noted for BAV and TAV groups, respectively. One-year progressions of AA were similar at Valsalva (0.11 ± 0.88 vs 0.14 ± 1.10 mm) and tubular levels (0.12 ± 0.68 vs 0.30 ± 1.51 mm) in BAV and TAV groups, respectively. A trend toward increased rapid AA progression in patients with BAV (31.3%) was observed compared with patients with TAV (14.8%, p = 0.099). BAV was associated with progression of V (β = 0.17, p = 0.036), the dimensionless index (β = -0.17, p = 0.008), and AVA (β = -0.14, p = 0.048), but not mean gradient after adjusting for age, baseline severity indexes, gender, hypertension, diabetes, and body surface area. Although BAV was a determinant of larger baseline AA diameter, there was no significant association between BAV and AA rapid progressors. Adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated no differences in congestive heart failure, aortic valve replacement, or mortality between valve morphology. In conclusion, there was a similar 1-year disease progression in terms of AVA, V, mean gradient, and AA diameters between patients with BAV and patients with TAV. BAV was associated with a significant increase in V, dimensionless index, and AVA after adjusting for important confounders. Close and prolonged follow-up is warranted in both groups of patients.

摘要

研究主动脉瓣解剖结构(二叶式主动脉瓣[BAV]或三叶式主动脉瓣[TAV])对中度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)和升主动脉(AA)扩张进展的影响及其预后意义有限。1991 年至 2016 年,回顾性研究了 288 例在指数超声心动图中检测到的无症状中度 AS 患者,这些患者至少有 1 年的超声心动图随访。比较了 BAV(n=80)和 TAV(n=208)患者之间的基线临床和超声心动图特征。主要终点是 1 年的 AS 和 AA 扩张的血液动力学和解剖学进展。次要终点是 AA 快速进展者的发生率、全因死亡率、主动脉瓣置换和充血性心力衰竭。评估了 AS 进展、AA 直径、AA 扩张和预后结局的决定因素。BAV 和 TAV 组的主动脉瓣峰值速度 V(9±18 比 9±23cm/s)、平均梯度(1.5±2.3 比 1.3±3.2mmHg)和主动脉瓣面积(AVA)(-0.04±0.09 比-0.05±0.10cm)在 1 年内均有相似的进展。BAV 和 TAV 组在 Valsalva(0.11±0.88 比 0.14±1.10mm)和管状水平(0.12±0.68 比 0.30±1.51mm)的 AA 进展相似。与 TAV 患者(14.8%,p=0.099)相比,BAV 患者(31.3%)AA 快速进展的趋势更高。BAV 与 V(β=0.17,p=0.036)、无量纲指数(β=-0.17,p=0.008)和 AVA(β=-0.14,p=0.048)的进展相关,但与年龄、基线严重程度指数、性别、高血压、糖尿病和体表面积调整后的平均梯度无关。尽管 BAV 是基线 AA 直径较大的决定因素,但 BAV 与 AA 快速进展者之间无明显关联。调整后的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,瓣膜形态之间充血性心力衰竭、主动脉瓣置换或死亡率无差异。结论:BAV 和 TAV 患者的 1 年 AVA、V、平均梯度和 AA 直径的疾病进展相似。BAV 与调整重要混杂因素后的 V、无量纲指数和 AVA 显著增加相关。两组患者均需要密切和长期随访。

相似文献

[1]
Prognostic Implications of Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve Phenotype on Progression of Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Ascending Aorta Dilatation.

Am J Cardiol. 2021-12-15

[2]
Aortic stiffness in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiovascular MRI: a comparison between bicuspid and tricuspid valves.

Eur Radiol. 2018-11-28

[3]
Effect of aortic valve phenotype and sex on aorta dilation in patients with aortic stenosis.

Open Heart. 2024-10-17

[4]
Dilatation of the remaining aorta after aortic valve or aortic root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: a 5-year follow-up.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2013-5-20

[5]
Patterns of ascending aortic dilatation and predictors of surgical replacement of the aorta: A comparison of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve patients over eight years of follow-up.

J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2019-7-23

[6]
Ascending aorta dilatation rates in patients with tricuspid and bicuspid aortic stenosis: the COFRASA/GENERAC study.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018-7-1

[7]
Measurement of the ascending aorta diameter in patients with severe bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis using dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011-10-19

[8]
Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves.

Am J Cardiol. 2020-5-16

[9]
Effect of Aortic Valve Replacement on Aortic Root Dilatation Rate in Patients With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2016-12

[10]
Aortopathy and bicuspid aortic valve: haemodynamic burden is main contributor to aortic dilatation.

Heart. 2012-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Growth Rates and Predicting Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2025-4

[2]
The mechanistic pathways of oxidative stress in aortic stenosis and clinical implications.

Theranostics. 2022

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索