Dai Yanmei, Jiang Huijie, Jiang Hao, Zhao Sheng, Zeng Xu, Sun Ran, Zheng Ruoshui
Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150086, China.
Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150086, China.
Transl Oncol. 2021 Dec;14(12):101238. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101238. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
The combination therapy of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib were proved to be one of the effective methods for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although it has been confirmed that the combination therapy can prolong survival for advanced HCC effectively, the therapeutic efficacy and safety are still controversial and the clinical value has not been determined. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy and discuss the optimal timing of combination for better clinical benefits.
PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were systematically reviewed to search for relevant studies published before May 15, 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of TACE + sorafenib with TACE + placebo / alone were adopted. Two reviewers independently extracted study outcomes. The data were analyzed through fixed/random-effect meta-analysis models with Review Manager (Version 5. 3) software.
7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included with 1464 patients with unresectable HCC (734 in TACE + sorafenib group and 730 in TACE + placebo or alone group). Meta-analysis showed that objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were slightly improved in TACE + sorafenib group (ORR: risk ratio = 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.42; P = 0.002; DCR: risk ratio = 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.18; P = 0.02). The combination therapy obviously improved time to progression (TTP) (hazard ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.96; P = 0.03) and progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.73, P < 0.00001) but not overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.59-1.46; P = 0.75) or time to untreatable progression (TTUP) (hazard ratio: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.31-1.89; P = 0.56). In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions (AEs) in combination group were higher than TACE + placebo / alone group. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed that the heterogeneity of TTP was notably decreased (pre-TACE: P = 0.12, I = 48%; post-TACE: P = 0.58, I = 0%), and the hazard ratio was 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.51-0.68; P < 0.00001) in pre-TACE subgroup which indicated that combination before TACE significantly prolonged TTP but not in combination after TACE (hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.24; P = 0.46). In term of AEs, sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk ratio for hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, rash/desquamation, and hypertension was 7.41, 2.58, 2.14, 1.55 in pre-TACE subgroup respectively and was 11.34, 3.26, 3.61, 4.11 in post-TACE subgroup respectively (All P < 0.05).
The combination of TACE and sorafenib significantly can improve TTP and PFS, and reduce the level of risk of adverse reactions of unresectable HCC, especially in the combination before TACE.
经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合索拉非尼治疗被证明是中晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的有效治疗方法之一。尽管已证实联合治疗可有效延长晚期HCC患者的生存期,但其疗效和安全性仍存在争议,临床价值尚未确定。本荟萃分析旨在评估联合治疗的疗效和安全性,并探讨联合治疗的最佳时机以获得更好的临床效益。
系统检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE和Web of Science,以查找2021年5月15日前发表的相关研究。纳入比较TACE + 索拉非尼与TACE + 安慰剂/单纯TACE疗效和安全性的研究。两名研究者独立提取研究结果。采用Review Manager(5.3版)软件通过固定/随机效应荟萃分析模型对数据进行分析。
纳入7项随机对照试验(RCT),共1464例不可切除HCC患者(TACE + 索拉非尼组734例,TACE + 安慰剂或单纯TACE组730例)。荟萃分析显示,TACE + 索拉非尼组的客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)略有提高(ORR:风险比 = 1.24;95%置信区间:1.08 - 1.42;P = 0.002;DCR:风险比 = 1.09;95%置信区间:1.01 - 1.18;P = 0.02)。联合治疗显著改善了疾病进展时间(TTP)(风险比:0.73;95%置信区间:0.55 - 0.96;P = 0.03)和无进展生存期(PFS)(风险比0.62;95%置信区间:0.52 - 0.73,P < 0.00001),但未改善总生存期(OS)(风险比:0.93;95%置信区间:0.59 - 1.46;P = 0.75)或不可治疗进展时间(TTUP)(风险比:0.76;95%置信区间:0.31 - 1.89;P = 0.56)。此外,联合治疗组的不良反应(AE)发生率高于TACE + 安慰剂/单纯TACE组。进一步的亚组分析显示,TTP的异质性显著降低(TACE前:P = 0.12,I² = 48%;TACE后:P = 0.58,I² = 0%),TACE前亚组的风险比为0.59(95%置信区间:0.51 - 0.68;P < 0.00001),表明TACE前联合治疗可显著延长TTP,而TACE后联合治疗则不然(风险比:0.88;95%置信区间:0.62 - 1.24;P = 0.46)。在AE方面,敏感性分析表明,TACE前亚组手足皮肤反应、腹泻、皮疹/脱屑和高血压的风险比分别为7.41、2.58、2.14、1.55,TACE后亚组分别为11.34、3.26、3.61、4.11(所有P < 0.05)。
TACE联合索拉非尼可显著改善不可切除HCC的TTP和PFS,并降低不良反应风险水平,尤其是TACE前联合治疗。