Suppr超能文献

三种家居和个人护理产品防腐剂的抗生物污染功效:生物膜抑制和预防。

Anti-biofouling efficacy of three home and personal care product preservatives: biofilm inhibition and prevention.

机构信息

Green Safe Water Lab, Civil Engineering Department, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Biofouling. 2021 Sep;37(8):879-893. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2021.1978988. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

Abstract

Due to increasing water scarcity, it is essential to determine cost-effective and efficient methods of producing potable water, especially ones that utilize non-traditional sources. Although reverse osmosis (RO) shows promise as a key-player in mitigating water scarcity, it is limited by biofouling. It is therefore integral to identify effective antifoulants that also do not damage the membrane, cause resistance, or negatively impact human health and the environment. Potential antifoulants include preservatives used in home and personal care products. It is hypothesized that safer preservatives can be applied to RO systems to remove or prevent biofouling. Three preservatives including methylisothiazolinone (MIT), phenoxyethanol (PE), and sodium benzoate (SB) were tested antimicrobial susceptibility tests against biofilms grown in 96-well plates to investigate both biofilm prevention and biofilm removal. Data were collected in the form of minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) and minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC), respectively. MIT was the most effective of the three preservatives but also poses the highest hazard to human health and the environment. Due to efficacy and safety concerns, MIT, PE, and SB are not the final solution; however, a process was demonstrated for determining the efficacy of novel, safer antifoulants. Ultimately, further investigations into safer antifoulants, paired with a greater understanding of biofilm removal and prevention doses will help make RO a better solution for water scarcity.

摘要

由于水资源短缺日益严重,因此确定生产饮用水的具有成本效益和高效的方法至关重要,尤其是利用非传统水源的方法。尽管反渗透(RO)作为缓解水资源短缺的关键技术具有广阔的前景,但它受到生物污染的限制。因此,识别有效的抗生物污染剂非常重要,这些抗生物污染剂既不会损坏膜,也不会产生耐药性,也不会对人类健康和环境造成负面影响。潜在的抗生物污染剂包括家用和个人护理产品中使用的防腐剂。假设可以将更安全的防腐剂应用于 RO 系统以去除或防止生物污染。本研究选用三种防腐剂,包括甲基异噻唑啉酮(MIT)、苯氧乙醇(PE)和苯甲酸钠(SB),通过 96 孔板中的抗菌药敏试验测试它们对生物膜的预防和去除效果。数据以最低生物膜抑制浓度(MBIC)和最低生物膜清除浓度(MBEC)的形式收集。结果表明,三种防腐剂中 MIT 的效果最好,但对人类健康和环境的危害也最大。由于功效和安全问题,MIT、PE 和 SB 不是最终的解决方案;但是,本研究展示了确定新型、更安全的抗生物污染剂功效的过程。最终,进一步研究更安全的抗生物污染剂,并深入了解生物膜去除和预防剂量,将有助于使 RO 成为解决水资源短缺的更好方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验