Lynn Lauren, Scholes Rachel C, Kim Jong H, Wilson-Welder Jennifer H, Orts William J, Hart-Cooper William M
Bioproducts Research Unit, Western Regional Research Center, USDA-ARS, 800 Buchanan St., Albany, California 94710, United States.
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of British Columbia, 2002-6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
ACS Omega. 2024 Apr 10;9(16):17869-17877. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c08672. eCollection 2024 Apr 23.
Preservatives, such as isothiazolinones and formaldehyde-releasing compounds, provide safety and stability in consumer products by preventing microbial contamination. Yet these ingredients present human and environmental hazards, including allergic contact dermatitis and aquatic toxicity. The development of safer alternatives has been stymied by trade-offs between safety and efficacy. To enable the identification of safer preservatives, substances from eight functional classes were assessed for antimicrobial efficacy and human and environmental hazards. First, 130 substances were evaluated for microbial inhibitory activity against two relevant model microorganisms, (filamentous fungi) and (Gram-negative bacteria). High-performing compounds within each class were assessed for hazards across a broad suite of human and environmental health end points. Four promising compounds were selected for further testing based on microbial inhibition, hazard profiles, and commercial availability. These ingredients were tested for biocidal activity in model home care formulations using methods adapted from industrial preservative challenge guidelines (USP-51). Two substances were identified, caprylhydroxamic acid and caprylyl glycol, that provided adequate preservation and improved toxicity profiles compared to isothiazolinone and formaldehyde-releasing preservatives. This study highlights trade-offs between antimicrobial activity and hazards across a broad spectrum of chemical classes relevant to safer preservative development.
防腐剂,如异噻唑啉酮和释放甲醛的化合物,通过防止微生物污染来确保消费品的安全性和稳定性。然而,这些成分对人类和环境存在危害,包括过敏性接触性皮炎和水生毒性。由于安全性和有效性之间的权衡,更安全替代品的开发受到了阻碍。为了能够识别更安全的防腐剂,对来自八个功能类别的物质进行了抗菌功效以及对人类和环境危害的评估。首先,评估了130种物质对两种相关模式微生物(丝状真菌)和(革兰氏阴性细菌)的抑菌活性。对每个类别中表现优异的化合物进行了一系列广泛的人类和环境健康终点的危害评估。基于抑菌作用、危害特征和商业可得性,选择了四种有前景的化合物进行进一步测试。使用从工业防腐剂挑战指南(USP - 51)改编的方法,在家庭护理配方模型中测试了这些成分的杀菌活性。确定了两种物质,即辛酰羟肟酸和辛二醇,与异噻唑啉酮和释放甲醛的防腐剂相比,它们能提供足够的防腐效果且毒性特征更佳。这项研究突出了在与更安全防腐剂开发相关的广泛化学类别中,抗菌活性与危害之间的权衡。