J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):365-375. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1081.
The purpose of this scoping review is to evaluate the extent of library or librarian involvement in informatics education in the health domain.
We searched eight databases from their inception to 2019 for reports of informatics educational activities for health professionals or health professions students that involved library staff or resources. Two reviewers independently screened all titles/abstracts (n=2,196) and resolved inclusion decisions by consensus. From the full text of the 36 papers that met the inclusion criteria, we extracted data on 41 educational activities.
The most frequent coded purposes of activities were "teaching clinical tools" (n=19, 46.3%) and "technology" (n=17; 41.5%). Medical students were the most frequent primary audience (34.1%), though 41.5% of activities had multiple audiences. Evaluation was reported for 24 activities (58.5%), only a few of which assessed short or post-activity impact on attitudes, knowledge, or skills. The most common long-term outcome was applying skills in other courses or clinical experiences. Thematic analysis yielded three areas of outcomes and issues for the library and organizational partners: expanded opportunities, technology and resource issues, and value demonstration.
Limited published examples of health informatics educational activities provide models for library roles in informatics education. More librarians should report on their informatics educational activities and provide sufficient details on the interventions and their evaluation. This would strengthen the evidence base about the potential impact of libraries within informatics education.
本范围综述旨在评估图书馆员或图书馆在健康领域信息学教育中的参与程度。
我们从八个数据库中搜索了从成立到 2019 年的报告,这些报告涉及涉及图书馆工作人员或资源的卫生专业人员或卫生专业学生的信息学教育活动。两名审查员独立筛选所有标题/摘要(n=2,196),并通过共识解决纳入决策。从符合纳入标准的 36 篇全文中,我们提取了 41 项教育活动的数据。
活动最常见的编码目的是“教授临床工具”(n=19,46.3%)和“技术”(n=17;41.5%)。医学生是最常见的主要受众(34.1%),尽管 41.5%的活动有多个受众。报告了 24 项活动的评估(58.5%),其中只有少数评估了对态度、知识或技能的短期或活动后影响。最常见的长期结果是将技能应用于其他课程或临床经验。主题分析得出了图书馆和组织合作伙伴的三个成果和问题领域:扩大机会、技术和资源问题以及价值证明。
有限的健康信息学教育活动的已发表示例为图书馆在信息学教育中的角色提供了模型。应该有更多的图书馆员报告他们的信息学教育活动,并提供有关干预措施及其评估的足够详细信息。这将加强有关图书馆在信息学教育中的潜在影响的证据基础。