Suppr超能文献

医学教育中的图书馆指导:美国和加拿大当前实践调查

Library instruction in medical education: a survey of current practices in the United States and Canada.

作者信息

Nevius Amanda M, Ettien A'Llyn, Link Alissa P, Sobel Laura Y

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):98-107. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.374. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The most recent survey on instruction practices in libraries affiliated with accredited medical institutions in the United States was conducted in 1996. The present study sought to update these data, while expanding to include Canadian libraries. Additional analysis was undertaken to test for statistically significant differences between library instruction in the United States and Canada and between libraries affiliated with highly ranked and unranked institutions.

METHODS

A twenty-eight-question survey was distributed to libraries affiliated with accredited US and Canadian medical schools to assess what and how often librarians teach, as well as how librarians are involved in the curriculum committee and if they are satisfied with their contact with students and faculty. Quantitative data were analyzed with SAS, R, and MedCalc.

RESULTS

Most of the seventy-three responding libraries provided instruction, both asynchronously and synchronously. Library instruction was most likely to be offered in two years of medical school, with year one seeing the most activity. Database use was the most frequently taught topic, and libraries reported a median of five librarians providing instruction, with larger staffs offering slightly more education sessions per year. Libraries associated with highly ranked schools were slightly more likely to offer sessions that were integrated into the medical school curriculum in year four and to offer sessions in more years overall.

CONCLUSIONS

In US and Canadian libraries, regardless of the rank of the affiliated medical school, librarians' provision of instruction in multiple formats on multiple topics is increasingly common.

摘要

目的

美国最近一次针对经认可的医疗机构附属图书馆教学实践的调查是在1996年进行的。本研究旨在更新这些数据,同时扩大范围纳入加拿大的图书馆。还进行了额外分析,以检验美国和加拿大图书馆教学之间以及高排名和低排名机构附属图书馆之间是否存在统计学上的显著差异。

方法

向美国和加拿大经认可的医学院附属图书馆发放了一份包含28个问题的调查问卷,以评估图书馆员教授的内容和频率,以及图书馆员如何参与课程委员会,以及他们是否对与学生和教师的接触感到满意。定量数据使用SAS、R和MedCalc进行分析。

结果

73家回复的图书馆中,大多数都提供了异步和同步教学。图书馆教学最有可能在医学院的前两年进行,一年级的教学活动最为频繁。数据库使用是最常教授的主题,图书馆报告称,提供教学的馆员中位数为5人,规模较大的图书馆每年提供的教学课程略多。与高排名学校相关的图书馆更有可能在四年级提供融入医学院课程的教学课程,并且总体上在更多年份提供教学课程。

结论

在美国和加拿大的图书馆中,无论附属医学院的排名如何,馆员以多种形式就多个主题提供教学的情况越来越普遍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c1/5764599/76b337dcfba3/jmla-106-98-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验