International health library associations urge the ICMJE to seek information specialists as peer reviewers for knowledge synthesis publications.
作者信息
Iverson Sandy, Seta Maurella Della, Lefebvre Carol, Ritchie Ann, Traditi Lisa, Baliozian Kevin
机构信息
President, The Canadian Health Libraries Association (CHLA/ABSC).
President, The European Association for Health Information and Libraries (EAHIL).
出版信息
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):503-504. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1301.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
International health library associations urge the ICMJE to seek information specialists as peer reviewers for knowledge synthesis publications.国际卫生图书馆协会敦促国际医学期刊编辑委员会寻求信息专家作为知识综合出版物的同行评审员。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):503-504. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1301.
2
The ICMJE recommendations: challenges in fortifying publishing integrity.ICMJE 建议：加强出版诚信面临的挑战。
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;189(4):1179-1181. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02227-1. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
3
[The relevance of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) for medical publishing and research].[国际医学期刊编辑委员会（ICMJE）对医学出版与研究的相关性]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Jan;142(1):79-83. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014000100012.
4
Ethical guidelines for publications of research.研究出版物的伦理准则。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996 Jan;81(1):R1-2. doi: 10.1210/jc.81.1.1.
5
Honorary Authorship: Is There Any Chance to Stop It? Analysis of the Literature and a Personal Opinion.荣誉作者：是否有机会制止它？文献分析及个人观点。
Tomography. 2021 Nov 15;7(4):801-803. doi: 10.3390/tomography7040067.
6
[Participation of Venezuela in the international scientific literature].委内瑞拉在国际科学文献中的参与情况
Educ Med Salud. 1974;8(1):24-32.
7
Updated Editorial Guidance for Quality and Reliability of Research Output.研究成果质量和可靠性的更新编辑指南。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Aug 16;33(35):e247. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e247. eCollection 2018 Aug 27.
8
What makes an eLife paper in epidemiology and global health?什么样的论文能发表在《eLife》杂志的流行病学与全球健康板块？
Elife. 2015 Oct 7;4:e11326. doi: 10.7554/eLife.11326.
9
The ICMJE Recommendations and pharmaceutical marketing--strengths, weaknesses and the unsolved problem of attribution in publication ethics.国际医学期刊编辑委员会（ICMJE）建议与药品营销——出版伦理中的优势、劣势及未解决的归因问题
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Apr 4;17:20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0103-7.
10
Suppression by medical journals of a warning about overdosing formula-fed infants with fluoride.医学期刊对人工喂养婴儿过量摄入氟化物的警告进行压制。
Account Res. 1997;5(1-3):225-37. doi: 10.1080/08989629708573911.
引用本文的文献
1
Effect of librarian collaboration on otolaryngology systematic review and meta-analysis quality.图书馆员协作对耳鼻喉科系统评价和荟萃分析质量的影响。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Jul 1;112(3):261-274. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1774. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance.图书馆员和信息专家作为方法学同行评审员：以《国际卫生治理杂志》为例的研究
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024 Jan 19;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00142-4.
3
Searching for evidence in public health emergencies: a white paper of best practices.公共卫生突发事件中的证据检索：最佳实践白皮书。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2023 Apr 21;111(1-2):566-578. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1530.
4
The case of the disappearing librarians: analyzing documentation of librarians' contributions to systematic reviews.消失的图书馆员案例：分析图书馆员对系统评价贡献的文献记录。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Oct 1;110(4):409-418. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1505.
本文引用的文献
1
An environmental scan of librarian involvement in systematic reviews at Queen's University: 2020 update.女王大学图书馆员参与系统评价的环境扫描：2020年更新
J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2021 Aug 1;42(2):110-117. doi: 10.29173/jchla29517. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey.图书馆员作为系统评价的方法学同行评审员：一项在线调查的结果
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Nov 27;4:23. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0083-5. eCollection 2019.
3
The search and selection for primary studies in systematic reviews published in dental journals indexed in MEDLINE was not fully reproducible.在 MEDLINE 索引的牙科期刊中发表的系统评价的初级研究的检索和选择不是完全可重现的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;98:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews.图书馆员对儿科系统评价文献检索部分报告的影响。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Oct;104(4):267-277. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.004.
5
Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study.在高影响力的儿科学、心脏病学和外科学期刊上发表的系统评价中，检索策略的可重复性较差：一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 26;11(9):e0163309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163309. eCollection 2016.
6
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.冗余、误导性及存在冲突的系统评价和Meta分析的大量产出。
Milbank Q. 2016 Sep;94(3):485-514. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12210.
7
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.生物医学研究系统评价的流行病学及报告特征：一项横断面研究
PLoS Med. 2016 May 24;13(5):e1002028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028. eCollection 2016 May.
8
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: librarians are listening and are part of the answer.提高生物医学研究的价值并减少浪费：图书馆员正在倾听，并且是答案的一部分。
Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1601. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30241-0. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
9
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审：2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
10
Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors.系统评价中推荐检索策略的使用及图书馆员参与的影响：对近期作者的横断面调查
PLoS One. 2015 May 4;10(5):e0125931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125931. eCollection 2015.
Zotero 插件