Dawe James, Hawkins Ii Raymond C, Lauriola Marco, Leichsenring Falk, Pezzuti Lina
Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
School of Psychology, Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 22;12:621669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621669. eCollection 2021.
The present study examines the validity of 11 new Holtzman Inkblot Technique indices. These were chosen from Exner's Comprehensive System (RCS) indices using two criteria: first, they had to be valid according to meta-analysis, and second, they must be computed using the HIT standard scoring system. Both techniques were administrated with a retest interval from 1 to 7days to a sample of 139 subjects (63 males and 76 females) from the general population. The validity of the new indices was studied through Pearson correlation () with the corresponding RCS indices. Nine of the 11 new indices (R-HIT, F%-HIT, M-HIT, m-HIT, C'-HIT, Blends-HIT, PureH-HIT, DQ+HIT, and X-%-HIT) showed significant correlations with Rorschach scales, confirming our hypotheses. The correlation ranged from a minimum of 0.144 to a maximum of 0.414. The results provide support for the validity of the new HIT indices and have important implications for both clinical and research fields.
本研究检验了11项新的霍尔兹曼墨迹技术指标的有效性。这些指标是从艾克纳综合系统(RCS)指标中根据两个标准选取的:第一,根据元分析,它们必须是有效的;第二,它们必须使用霍尔兹曼墨迹技术标准评分系统进行计算。这两种技术对来自普通人群的139名受试者(63名男性和76名女性)进行了施测,重测间隔为1至7天。通过与相应的RCS指标进行皮尔逊相关分析()研究了新指标的有效性。11项新指标中的9项(R-HIT、F%-HIT、M-HIT、m-HIT、C'-HIT、混合-HIT、纯H-HIT, DQ+HIT和X-%-HIT)与罗夏测验量表显示出显著相关性,证实了我们的假设。相关性范围从最小值0.144到最大值0.414。结果为新的霍尔兹曼墨迹技术指标的有效性提供了支持,并对临床和研究领域都具有重要意义。