Capper Judith L, De Carvalho Thiago B, Hancock Andrew S, Sá Filho Ocilon G, Odeyemi Isaac, Bartram David J
Livestock Sustainability Consultancy, Harwell, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0HH, UK.
Unesp, Paulista State University, Universitaria Avenue, 3780 Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Transl Anim Sci. 2021 Sep 20;5(4):txab144. doi: 10.1093/tas/txab144. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Brazilian beef systems contribute 14.9% of global beef production, therefore given climate change concerns, there is a clear need to reduce environmental impacts while maintaining economic viability. This study evaluated the hypothesis that steroid implant use in Brazilian beef cattle would reduce resource use, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and economic costs of production, thereby improving environmental and economic sustainability. A deterministic model based on beef cattle population demographics, nutrition and performance was used to quantify resource inputs and GHG emissions per 1.0 × 10 kg of hot carcass weight (HCW) beef. System boundaries extended from cropping input manufacture to cattle arriving at the slaughterhouse. Beef systems were modeled using herd population dynamics, feed and performance data sourced from producers in four Brazilian states, with additional data from global databases. Implants were used in calves, growing and finishing cattle at low (LI), medium (MI), and high (HI) levels of performance enhancement, compared to nonimplanted (NI) controls. Feed use results were used in combination with producer-derived input costs to assess the economic impacts of implant use, including production costs and returns on investment. Improved FCE, ADG, and carcass weights conferred by implant use reduced the number of cattle and the time taken to produce 1.0 × 10 kg HCW beef. Compared to NI controls, the quantities of feed, land, water and fossil fuels required to produce 1.0 × 10 kg HCW beef was reduced in implanted cattle, with reductions proportional to the performance-enhancing effect of the implant (HI > MI > LI). Implant use reduced GHG emissions per 1.0 × 10 kg HCW beef by 9.4% (LI), 12.6% (MI), or 15.8% (HI). Scaling up the MI effects to represent all eligible Brazilian cattle being implanted, revealed avoided GHG emissions equivalent to the annual exhaust emissions of 62.0 × 10 cars. Economic impacts of implant use reflected the environmental results, resulting in a greater margin for the producers within each system (cow-calf through to finishing). The 6.13% increase in kg of HCW beef produced generates a cost reduction of 3.76% and an increase in the return on invested capital of 4.14% on average. Implants offer the opportunity for Brazilian beef producers to demonstrate their dedication to improving environmental and economic sustainability through improved productivity, although care must be taken to avoid negative trade-offs.
巴西牛肉系统占全球牛肉产量的14.9%,因此,考虑到气候变化问题,显然有必要在维持经济可行性的同时减少环境影响。本研究评估了以下假设:在巴西肉牛中使用类固醇植入剂将减少资源使用、温室气体(GHG)排放和生产的经济成本,从而提高环境和经济可持续性。基于肉牛种群统计学、营养和性能的确定性模型被用于量化每1.0×10千克热胴体重(HCW)牛肉的资源投入和温室气体排放。系统边界从种植投入品生产延伸至抵达屠宰场的牛。牛肉系统使用来自巴西四个州生产者的畜群种群动态、饲料和性能数据进行建模,并补充了全球数据库的数据。与未植入(NI)对照相比,在犊牛、生长育肥牛中以低(LI)、中(MI)和高(HI)性能增强水平使用植入剂。饲料使用结果与生产者提供的投入成本相结合,以评估植入剂使用的经济影响,包括生产成本和投资回报。植入剂使用带来的饲料转化率(FCE)、平均日增重(ADG)和胴体重的提高减少了生产1.0×10千克HCW牛肉所需的牛数量和时间。与NI对照相比,植入牛生产1.0×10千克HCW牛肉所需的饲料、土地、水和化石燃料量减少,减少量与植入剂的性能增强效果成比例(HI>MI>LI)。植入剂使用使每1.0×10千克HCW牛肉的温室气体排放量减少了9.4%(LI)、12.6%(MI)或15.8%(HI)。将MI的效果扩大到代表所有符合条件的巴西植入牛,显示避免的温室气体排放量相当于62.0×10辆汽车的年尾气排放量。植入剂使用的经济影响反映了环境结果,导致每个系统(从母牛-犊牛到育肥)内生产者的利润更高。生产的HCW牛肉千克数增加6.13%,平均成本降低3.76%,投资资本回报率提高4.14%。植入剂为巴西牛肉生产者提供了一个机会,通过提高生产力来展示他们对改善环境和经济可持续性的奉献精神,不过必须注意避免负面的权衡。