Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, 71107Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Shandong Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Engineering Technology Research Center, Jinan, China.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:15330338211043975. doi: 10.1177/15330338211043975.
To investigate the features of helical tomotherapy and co-planar dual Arcs volumetric-modulated arc therapy during prophylactic cranial irradiation associated with bilateral hippocampal tissue sparing. Helical tomotherapy and co-planar dual arcs volumetric-modulated arc therapy treatment plans were generated with a dose of 30 Gy/10 fractions in 16 patients treated with prophylactic cranial irradiation. The dose to the bilateral hippocampal tissues, organs at risk, and planning target volume were determined when the average dose of bilateral hippocampal tissues was reduced by approximately 4 Gy as an observation point. Changes in dosimetry when sparing the bilateral hippocampal tissues were determined for both modalities. When bilateral hippocampal tissues were restricted to 8 Gy, = 7.64 ± 0.41 Gy in helical tomotherapy, while = 10.96 ± 0.38 Gy in co-planar dual arcs volumetric-modulated arc therapy volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Helical tomotherapy was associated with significantly lower doses to organs at risk, including ( = .03), ( = .01), ( = .01), ( = .02), ( = .02), ( = .02), and ( = .02), but not ( = .87). Helical tomotherapy provided better target coverage, with lower average ( = .02), higher average ( = .02), and better conformal index (0.87 vs 0.84, = .02) and homogeneity index (0.15 vs 0.21, = .05). With smaller bilateral hippocampal tissues doses, the planning target volume dose changed across 3 dosimetry regions for both modalities; the plateau region (>20.0 Gy for helical tomotherapy versus >16.0 Gy for co-planar dual arcs volumetric-modulated arc therapy), gradient region (20.0-12.0 Gy vs 16.0-11.0 Gy), and falling region (<12.0 Gy vs <11.0 Gy). The average delivery duration of helical tomotherapy was almost 7.7 times longer than that of co-planar dual arcs volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Helical tomotherapy was better at sparing the bilateral hippocampal tissues and organs at risk and had better target coverage but a significantly longer treatment duration than co-planar dual arcs volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Further dose decreases in the bilateral hippocampal tissues would yield worse target dose coverage.
为了研究螺旋断层放疗和共面双弧容积旋转调强放疗在双侧海马组织保护预防性颅照射中的特点。
对 16 例接受预防性颅照射的患者,采用 30Gy/10 次分割的剂量生成螺旋断层放疗和共面双弧容积旋转调强放疗治疗计划。当双侧海马组织的平均剂量减少约 4Gy 作为观察点时,确定双侧海马组织、危及器官和计划靶区的剂量。确定两种模式下双侧海马组织保护时的剂量变化。
当双侧海马组织限制在 8Gy 时,螺旋断层放疗为 7.64±0.41Gy,而共面双弧容积旋转调强放疗为 10.96±0.38Gy。与共面双弧容积旋转调强放疗相比,螺旋断层放疗对危及器官的剂量显著降低,包括 ( = .03), ( = .01), ( = .01), ( = .02), ( = .02), ( = .02)和 ( = .02),但不包括 ( = .87)。螺旋断层放疗提供了更好的靶区覆盖,平均 ( = .02)更高,平均 ( = .02)更高,适形指数(0.87 对 0.84, = .02)和均匀性指数(0.15 对 0.21, = .05)更好。随着双侧海马组织剂量的减小,两种模式的靶区剂量在 3 个剂量区都发生了变化;平台区(螺旋断层放疗>20.0Gy 对共面双弧容积旋转调强放疗>16.0Gy),梯度区(20.0-12.0Gy 对 16.0-11.0Gy)和下降区(<12.0Gy 对<11.0Gy)。螺旋断层放疗的平均治疗时间几乎是共面双弧容积旋转调强放疗的 7.7 倍。
螺旋断层放疗在保护双侧海马组织和危及器官方面效果更好,靶区覆盖更好,但治疗时间明显长于共面双弧容积旋转调强放疗。双侧海马组织剂量进一步降低将导致靶区剂量覆盖变差。