Refinement of Nonantibiotic Spray Programs for Fire Blight Control in Organic Pome Fruit.

Fire blight-susceptible, certified organic pome fruit is produced on 9,000 ha in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States with acreage continuing to expand despite a 2014 prohibition on antibiotics as allowable materials for infection suppression. Nonantibiotic practices for fire blight pathogen suppression mirror conventional management, but the full-bloom-to-petal-fall period when antibiotics are typically sprayed for fire blight control continues to receive research scrutiny owing to drawbacks and weaknesses of alternative materials. As solitary treatments, effective nonantibiotic materials (e.g., a yeast biocontrol, soluble coppers, and potassium aluminum sulfate) raise the risk of a crop-value-reducing, phytotoxic response termed "fruit russeting." Conversely, materials with less russeting risk (e.g., -based biorationals) are less effective for fire blight control. Spray programs using a sequence of materials applied from midbloom to petal fall have the potential to provide high levels of protection with reduced russeting risk. In orchard trials, the effects of nonantibiotic spray programs on the epiphytic population size of in flowers, yeast biocontrol population size, floral pH, infection suppression, and fruit russeting revealed strategies for sequencing sprays of nonantibiotic materials. The yeast biocontrol, Blossom Protect (), sprayed at 70% bloom, was an important contributor to fire blight pathogen suppression as was the soluble copper material, Previsto, when applied at full bloom. Choice of material for the petal-fall spray timing was important to fruit russeting risk but apparently less important to overall infection incidence. Consequently, treatment programs of Blossom Protect at 70% bloom, a soluble copper at full bloom, and a -based biorational at petal fall, best balance the quality of infection suppression with the risk of fruit russeting.