Suppr超能文献

我改变主意是为了变得更好:基于心理变化过程追踪的微观分析揭示了住院治疗期间神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症患者在食物选择过程中的差异。

I change my mind to get better: Process tracing-based microanalysis of food choice processes reveals differences between anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa during inpatient treatment.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Department of Psychology and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105745. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105745. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

Abstract

Food choice and its underlying processes is understudied in bulimia nervosa (BN) and anorexia nervosa (AN). Thus, we examined cognitive processes during food choice through mouse tracing in AN (n = 36) and BN (n = 27) undergoing inpatient treatment. Both patient groups and matched healthy controls (HC, n = 59) made 153 binary food choices before rating all foods on their liking and calorie density. Choice outcomes and corresponding mouse movements were modelled as a function of inpatient treatment stage in our analyses. Compared to patients with BN and HC, those with AN showed a clear calorie avoidance on most trials. Yet, mouse paths in AN patients early in treatment, revealed a late direction reversal ('change of mind', CoM) on high-calorie choices. AN patients later in treatment, by contrast, showed fewer CoM alongside more choices for - and liking of - high-calorie foods. Patients with BN showed more CoM trials during low-calorie choices and low-calorie choices were more frequent in patients later in treatment. Thus, relative to patients early in treatment, patients who are later in treatment show less of the overall group pattern of consistently choosing low-calorie food (AN) or high-calorie food (BN). Less cognitive regulation (fewer CoM trials) went along with higher liking for high-calorie foods in AN. These cross-sectional differences between AN early and late in treatment might reflect the formation of healthier habits. In addition, clear patient group differences suggest more specific treatment strategies.

摘要

在神经性贪食症 (BN) 和神经性厌食症 (AN) 中,食物选择及其潜在过程研究不足。因此,我们通过在住院治疗中的 AN(n=36)和 BN(n=27)患者中进行的小鼠追踪,检查了食物选择过程中的认知过程。所有患者组和匹配的健康对照组(HC,n=59)在对所有食物进行喜好和卡路里密度评分之前,都进行了 153 次二元食物选择。在我们的分析中,将选择结果和相应的鼠标运动作为住院治疗阶段的函数进行建模。与 BN 患者和 HC 相比,AN 患者在大多数试验中表现出明显的卡路里回避。然而,在治疗早期的 AN 患者的鼠标路径中,在高卡路里选择上显示出后期的方向反转(“改变主意”,CoM)。相比之下,在治疗后期的 AN 患者中,CoM 试验较少,并且更多地选择和喜欢高卡路里食物。BN 患者在低卡路里选择中显示出更多的 CoM 试验,并且在治疗后期低卡路里选择更频繁。因此,与治疗早期的患者相比,治疗后期的患者表现出的低卡路里食物(AN)或高卡路里食物(BN)的整体群体选择模式较少。AN 患者中,较少的认知调节(较少的 CoM 试验)伴随着对高卡路里食物的更高喜好。在治疗早期和晚期的 AN 之间的这些横断面差异可能反映了更健康习惯的形成。此外,明显的患者组差异表明更具体的治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验