• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进健康的政策工具:世卫组织关于烟草、酒精、营养和身体活动政策指导的比较。

Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity.

机构信息

Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

WHO European Office for Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1863-1873. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.95. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.2021.95
PMID:34634879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9808214/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Policy is an important element of influencing individual health-related behaviours associated to major risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as smoking, alcohol consumption, unhealthy eating and physical inactivity. However, our understanding of the specific measures recommended in NCD prevention policy-making remains limited. This study analysed recent World Health Organization (WHO) documents to identify common policy instruments suggested for national NCD prevention policy and to assess similarities and differences between policies targeting different health-related behaviours.

METHODS

Evert Vedung's typology of policy instruments, which differentiates between regulatory, economic/ fiscal and soft instruments, served as a basis for this analysis. A systematic search on WHO websites was conducted to identify documents relating to tobacco, alcohol, nutrition and physical activity. The staff of the respective units at the WHO Regional Office for Europe conducted an expert validation of these documents. The resulting documents were systematically searched for policy instruments. A word frequency analysis was conducted to estimate the use of individual instruments in the different policy fields, followed by an additional in-depth coding and content analysis by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Across all health-related behaviours, the following policy instruments were suggested most frequently in WHO guidance documents: laws, regulations, standards, taxes, prices, campaigns, recommendations, partnerships and coordination. The analysis showed that regulatory and economic/fiscal policy instruments are mainly applied in tobacco and alcohol policy, while soft instruments dominate in the fields of nutrition and especially physical activity.

CONCLUSION

The study confirms perceived differences regarding recommended policy instruments in the different policy fields and supports arguments that "harder" instruments still appear to be underutilized in nutrition and physical activity. However, more comprehensive research is needed, especially with respect to actual instrument use and effectiveness in national-level NCD prevention policy.

摘要

背景

政策是影响与非传染性疾病(NCD)相关的主要风险因素(如吸烟、饮酒、不健康饮食和缺乏身体活动)的个人健康相关行为的重要因素。然而,我们对 NCD 预防政策制定中推荐的具体措施的理解仍然有限。本研究分析了最近的世界卫生组织(WHO)文件,以确定针对国家 NCD 预防政策的常见政策工具,并评估针对不同健康相关行为的政策之间的相似之处和差异。

方法

埃弗特·文丁(Evert Vedung)的政策工具分类法将政策工具分为监管、经济/财政和软工具,为本分析提供了基础。在 WHO 网站上进行了系统搜索,以确定与烟草、酒精、营养和身体活动相关的文件。WHO 欧洲区域办事处的相关部门工作人员对这些文件进行了专家验证。对生成的文件进行了系统搜索,以查找政策工具。进行了词频分析,以估计在不同政策领域中使用单个工具的情况,然后由两名独立评审员进行额外的深入编码和内容分析。

结果

在所有健康相关行为中,以下政策工具在 WHO 指导文件中被建议得最为频繁:法律、法规、标准、税收、价格、运动、建议、伙伴关系和协调。分析表明,监管和经济/财政政策工具主要应用于烟草和酒精政策,而软工具在营养领域,尤其是在身体活动领域占据主导地位。

结论

该研究证实了在不同政策领域中推荐的政策工具存在差异,并支持了以下观点,即“更硬”的工具在营养和身体活动方面似乎仍未得到充分利用。然而,需要进行更全面的研究,特别是关于国家 NCD 预防政策中的实际工具使用和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44b/9808214/9088d8b9b3f1/ijhpm-11-1863-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44b/9808214/a10e1b564392/ijhpm-11-1863-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44b/9808214/9e92f466590a/ijhpm-11-1863-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44b/9808214/9088d8b9b3f1/ijhpm-11-1863-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44b/9808214/a10e1b564392/ijhpm-11-1863-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44b/9808214/9e92f466590a/ijhpm-11-1863-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44b/9808214/9088d8b9b3f1/ijhpm-11-1863-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity.促进健康的政策工具:世卫组织关于烟草、酒精、营养和身体活动政策指导的比较。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1863-1873. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.95. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
2
Non-communicable disease prevention policy process in five African countries.五个非洲国家的非传染性疾病预防政策制定过程。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 15;18(Suppl 1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5825-7.
3
Non-communicable disease care and physical activity promotion in India: analysis of recent policies, guidelines and workplans.印度的非传染性疾病护理和身体活动促进:对最近政策、指南和工作计划的分析。
Fam Med Community Health. 2020 Apr 2;8(2):e000206. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2019-000206. eCollection 2020.
4
A Scoping Review of Policies Related to the Prevention and Control of Overweight and Obesity in Africa.非洲超重和肥胖预防与控制相关政策的范围综述
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 11;13(11):4028. doi: 10.3390/nu13114028.
5
Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Control in Mongolia: A Policy Analysis.蒙古国的非传染性疾病预防与控制:政策分析
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 14;15:660. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2040-7.
6
Legal priorities for prevention of non-communicable diseases: innovations from WHO's Eastern Mediterranean region.预防非传染性疾病的法律重点:世界卫生组织东地中海区域的创新举措
Public Health. 2017 Mar;144:4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
7
Non-communicable disease policy implementation from 2014 to 2021: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of global policy data for 194 countries.2014 年至 2021 年期间非传染性疾病政策的实施情况:对 194 个国家全球政策数据的重复横断面分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Apr;11(4):e525-e533. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00042-6.
8
Non-communicable diseases in the WHO African region: analysis of risk factors, mortality, and responses based on WHO data.世界卫生组织非洲区域的非传染性疾病:基于世界卫生组织数据的风险因素、死亡率及应对措施分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 10;15(1):12288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97180-3.
9
Implementation of national policies and interventions (WHO Best Buys) for non-communicable disease prevention and control in Ghana: a mixed methods analysis.加纳实施非传染性疾病预防和控制的国家政策和干预措施(世卫组织最佳购买):混合方法分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Nov 15;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01242-3.
10
Strengthening implementation of diet-related non-communicable disease prevention strategies in Fiji: a qualitative policy landscape analysis.加强斐济与饮食相关的非传染性疾病预防策略的实施:定性政策分析。
Global Health. 2022 Sep 1;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00859-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The implementation of physical activity policies in the Netherlands: a study applying the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI).荷兰体育活动政策的实施:一项应用体育活动环境政策指数(PA-EPI)的研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 May 19;23(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01340-w.
2
Health sector advocacy for repurposing agricultural investments affecting fruits, vegetables and legumes.卫生部门倡导重新调整影响水果、蔬菜和豆类的农业投资用途。
Bull World Health Organ. 2025 May 1;103(5):328-336. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.292201. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
3
Physical activity-the past, present and potential future: a state-of-the-art review.

本文引用的文献

1
What are effective policies for promoting physical activity? A systematic review of reviews.促进身体活动的有效政策有哪些?一项综述的系统评价。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Apr 8;18:101095. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101095. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Monitoring progress toward United Nations commitments: characteristics of Canadian legislation to promote tobacco control, physical activity and healthy eating. A descriptive study.监测联合国承诺的进展情况:加拿大促进烟草控制、体育活动和健康饮食立法的特点。一项描述性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2019 Dec 13;7(4):E745-E753. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190049. Print 2019 Oct-Dec.
3
Nine types of recommendations, guidelines and policies: an exploratory test of a proposed typology of physical activity promotion documents.
体力活动的过去、现在与潜在未来:一篇前沿综述
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jan 17;40(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae175.
4
The impact of the world's first regulatory, multi-setting intervention on sedentary behaviour among children and adolescents (ENERGISE): a natural experiment evaluation.世界首个监管、多环境干预对儿童和青少年久坐行为影响的研究(ENERGISE):一项自然实验评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 May 13;21(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01591-w.
5
Consensus on a social return on investment model of physical activity and sport: a Delphi study protocol.身体活动与体育运动社会投资回报模型的共识:一项德尔菲研究方案
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Apr 5;6:1334805. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1334805. eCollection 2024.
6
Designing a new physical activity calorie equivalent food label and comparing its effect on caloric choices to that of the traffic light label among mothers: a mixed-method study.设计一种新的身体活动卡路里等效食品标签,并比较其对母亲热量选择的影响与交通信号灯标签的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 14;11:1280532. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1280532. eCollection 2023.
7
Power and Other Commercial Determinants of Health: An Empirical Study of the Australian Food, Alcohol, and Gambling Industries.权力和其他商业健康决定因素:对澳大利亚食品、酒精和赌博行业的实证研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7723. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7723. Epub 2023 May 28.
8
Skin Cancer Prevention across the G7, Australia and New Zealand: A Review of Legislation and Guidelines.七国集团、澳大利亚和新西兰的皮肤癌预防:立法和指南综述。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jun 23;30(7):6019-6040. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070450.
9
Health policy under the microscope: a micro policy design perspective.卫生政策透视:微观政策设计视角。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 14;11:1180836. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1180836. eCollection 2023.
10
Assessing the implementation of physical activity-promoting public policies in the Republic of Ireland: a study using the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI).评估爱尔兰共和国促进身体活动的公共政策实施情况:使用身体活动环境政策指数(PA-EPI)进行的研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 26;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01013-6.
九种类型的建议、指南和政策:对体育活动促进文件拟议类型学的探索性测试。
Arch Public Health. 2019 Dec 2;77:52. doi: 10.1186/s13690-019-0381-x. eCollection 2019.
4
Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe.工作场所的健康促进:欧洲政策与实践的比较
Saf Health Work. 2019 Mar;10(1):21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
5
Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research.健康政策研究的定性分析新方法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 14;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0404-z.
6
Migrants' access to healthcare services within the European Union: a content analysis of policy documents in Ireland, Portugal and Spain.欧盟内部移民获得医疗保健服务的情况:对爱尔兰、葡萄牙和西班牙政策文件的内容分析。
Global Health. 2018 Jun 15;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0373-6.
7
A Framework for Physical Activity Policy Research.身体活动政策研究框架
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S20-S29. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s20.
8
What is policy and where do we look for it when we want to research it?什么是政策?当我们想要研究政策时,该从哪里寻找相关内容呢?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Apr;71(4):404-408. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207945. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
9
To what extent do Australian child and youth health policies address the social determinants of health and health equity?: a document analysis study.澳大利亚儿童与青少年健康政策在多大程度上涉及健康的社会决定因素和健康公平性?一项文献分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 15;16:512. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3187-6.
10
Three types of scientific evidence to inform physical activity policy: results from a comparative scoping review.三种类型的科学证据可用于制定体育活动政策:来自比较范围综述的结果。
Int J Public Health. 2016 Jun;61(5):553-63. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0807-y. Epub 2016 Apr 26.