Suppr超能文献

脊髓性肌萎缩症患者脊柱侧凸手术中混合与全皮下线的比较。

Hybrid versus total sublaminar wires in patients with spinal muscular atrophy undergoing scoliosis surgery.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Orthopaedic Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):867. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04737-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early versions of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) scoliosis correction surgery often involved sublaminar devices. Recently, the utilization of pedicle screws has gained much popularity. Pedicle screws are generally believed to provide additional deformity correction, but pedicle size and rotational deformity limit their application in the thoracic spine, resulting in a hybrid construct involving pedicle screws and sublaminar wire. Studies of the efficacy of hybrid instrumentation in SMA scoliosis are often limited by the scarcity of the disease itself. In this study, we aimed to compare the surgical outcomes between hybrid constructs involving pedicle screws and sublaminar wire and sublaminar wire alone in patients with SMA scoliosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and radiographic assessments of patients with SMA scoliosis who underwent corrective surgery between 1993 and 2017. The radiographic assessments included deformity correction and progressive changes in the major curve angle, pelvic tilt (PT) and coronal balance (CB). The correction of deformities was observed postoperatively and at the patient's 2-year follow-up to test the efficacy of each type of construct.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were included in this study. There were 14 and 19 patients in the wiring and hybrid construct groups, respectively. The hybrid construct group demonstrated a higher major curve angle correction (50.5° ± 11.2° vs. 36.4° ± 8.4°, p < 0.001), a higher apical vertebral rotation correction (10.6° ± 3.9° vs. 4.8° ± 2.6°, p < 0.001), and a reduced progression of the major curve angle at the 2-year follow-up (5.1° ± 2.9° vs. 8.7° ± 4.8°, p < 0.001). A moderate correlation was observed between the magnitude of correction of the apical vertebral rotation angle and the major curve (r = 0.528, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that hybrid instrumentation can provide a greater magnitude of correction in major curve and apical rotation as well as less major curve progression than sublaminar wire instrumentation alone in patients with SMA scoliosis. Level of evidence III.

摘要

背景

早期的脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)脊柱侧凸矫形手术常涉及到椎板下器械。最近,椎弓根螺钉的应用越来越受欢迎。椎弓根螺钉通常被认为可以提供额外的畸形矫正,但椎弓根大小和旋转畸形限制了它们在胸段的应用,导致使用椎弓根螺钉和椎板下钢丝的混合结构。关于 SMA 脊柱侧凸混合器械疗效的研究通常受到疾病本身罕见的限制。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较 SMA 脊柱侧凸患者中使用椎弓根螺钉和椎板下钢丝混合结构与单独使用椎板下钢丝的手术结果。

方法

我们回顾性地审查了 1993 年至 2017 年间接受矫形手术治疗的 SMA 脊柱侧凸患者的临床记录和影像学评估。影像学评估包括畸形矫正和主要曲线角度、骨盆倾斜(PT)和冠状平衡(CB)的进展变化。术后和患者 2 年随访时观察畸形矫正情况,以测试每种结构的疗效。

结果

本研究共纳入 33 例患者。其中,椎板下钢丝组 14 例,混合结构组 19 例。混合结构组的主要曲线角度矫正(50.5°±11.2° vs. 36.4°±8.4°,p<0.001)、顶椎旋转矫正(10.6°±3.9° vs. 4.8°±2.6°,p<0.001)更高,主要曲线角度在 2 年随访时的进展更少(5.1°±2.9° vs. 8.7°±4.8°,p<0.001)。顶椎旋转角度矫正程度与主要曲线之间存在中度相关性(r=0.528,p=0.002)。

结论

本研究表明,与单独使用椎板下钢丝相比,混合器械在 SMA 脊柱侧凸患者中可以提供更大的主要曲线和顶椎旋转矫正程度,以及更小的主要曲线进展。证据等级 III。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c72/8507395/bb54587e6af4/12891_2021_4737_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验