Trauma and Orthopaedics, Northern Deanery, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
Eur Spine J. 2010 Mar;19(3):376-83. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1163-x. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
A non-randomised retrospective study to compare the results of surgical correction of scoliosis in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients using three different instrumentation systems-Sublaminar instrumentation system (Group A), a hybrid of sublaminar and pedicle screw systems (Group B) and pedicle screw system alone (Group C). Between 1993 and 2003, 43 patients with DMD underwent posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. Group A (n = 19) had sublaminar instrumentation system, Group B (n = 13) had a hybrid construct and Group C (n = 11) was treated with pedicle system. The mean blood loss in Group A was 4.1 l, 3.2 l in Group B and 2.5 l in Group C. Average operating times in Group A, B and C were 300, 274 and 234 min, respectively. Mean pre-operative, post-operative and final Cobb angle in Group A was 50.05 +/- 15.46 degrees , 15.68 +/- 11.23 degrees and 21.57 +/- 11.63 degrees , Group B was 17.76 +/- 8.50 degrees , 3.61 +/- 2.53 degrees and 6.69 +/- 4.19 degrees and Group C was 25.81 +/- 9.94 degrees , 5.45 +/- 3.88 degrees , 8.90 +/- 5.82 degrees , respectively. Flexibility index or the potential correction calculated from bending radiographs were 60 +/- 6.33, 70 +/- 4.65 and 67 +/- 6.79% for Group A, Group B and Group C respectively. The percentage correction achieved was 72.5 +/- 14.5% in Group A, 82 +/- 6% in Group B and 82 +/- 8% in Group C. The difference between percentage correction achieved and the flexibility index was 12.45 +/- 8.22, 12.05 +/- 1.3 and 15.00 +/- 1.21% in Group A, B and C, respectively The percentage loss of correction in Cobb angles at final follow-up in Group A, B and C was 12.5 +/- 3.5, 16.5 +/- 1. and 12.5 +/- 2.5%, respectively. Complications seen in Group A were three cases of wound infection and two cases of implant failure; Group B had a single case of implant failure and Group C had one patient with wound infection and one case with a partial screw pull out. Early surgery and smaller curve corrections appears to be the current trend in the management of scoliosis in DMD. This has been possible due to early curve detection and surgery thus having the advantage of less post-operative respiratory complications and stay in paediatric intensive care. Also, early surgery avoids development of pelvic deformity and extension of instrumentation to the pelvis thereby reducing blood loss. This trend reflects the advent of newer and safer instrumentation systems, advanced techniques in anaesthesia and cord monitoring. Sublaminar instrumentation system group had increased operating times and blood loss compared to both the hybrid and pedicle screw instrumentation systems due to increased bleeding from epidural vessels and pelvic instrumentation. Overall, the three instrumentation constructs appear to provide and maintain an optimal degree of correction at medium to long term follow up but the advantages of lesser blood loss and surgical time without the need for pelvic fixation seem to swing the verdict in favour of the pedicle screw system.
一项非随机回顾性研究比较了三种不同内固定系统(A 组:皮下固定系统,B 组:皮下和椎弓根螺钉混合系统,C 组:单纯椎弓根螺钉系统)治疗杜氏肌营养不良(DMD)患者脊柱侧弯的手术结果。1993 年至 2003 年,43 例 DMD 患者接受了后路脊柱融合和内固定术。A 组(n=19)采用皮下固定系统,B 组(n=13)采用混合结构,C 组(n=11)采用椎弓根螺钉系统。A 组平均失血量为 4.1 升,B 组为 3.2 升,C 组为 2.5 升。A、B、C 组的平均手术时间分别为 300、274 和 234 分钟。A 组术前、术后和最终 Cobb 角分别为 50.05±15.46°、15.68±11.23°和 21.57±11.63°,B 组分别为 17.76±8.50°、3.61±2.53°和 6.69±4.19°,C 组分别为 25.81±9.94°、5.45±3.88°、8.90±5.82°。从弯曲位片计算的柔韧性指数或潜在矫正率分别为 A 组 60±6.33%、B 组 70±4.65%和 C 组 67±6.79%。A、B、C 组的实际矫正率分别为 72.5±14.5%、82±6%和 82±8%。A、B、C 组实际矫正率与柔韧性指数的差值分别为 12.45±8.22%、12.05±1.3%和 15.00±1.21%。A、B、C 组最终随访 Cobb 角矫正丢失率分别为 12.5±3.5%、16.5±1.0%和 12.5±2.5%。A 组有 3 例伤口感染和 2 例植入物失败,B 组有 1 例植入物失败,C 组有 1 例伤口感染和 1 例部分螺钉拔出。早期手术和较小的矫正似乎是目前 DMD 脊柱侧弯管理的趋势。这是可能的,因为早期的曲线检测和手术,因此具有较少的术后呼吸并发症和在儿科重症监护病房停留的优势。此外,早期手术可避免骨盆畸形的发展和器械向骨盆的延伸,从而减少出血。这一趋势反映了新的和更安全的器械系统、麻醉和脊髓监测技术的进步。由于硬膜外血管和骨盆内固定器出血增加,皮下固定系统组的手术时间和失血量均高于混合和椎弓根螺钉固定系统组。总的来说,这三种内固定系统在中远期随访中都能提供并维持较好的矫正度,但出血和手术时间较少的优势,而无需骨盆固定,似乎使椎弓根螺钉系统更具优势。