• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹膜后软组织肉瘤治疗的国家趋势:治疗策略变化的现代评估。

National Trends in Treatment for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Modern Appraisal of Variability in Therapeutic Strategies.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;29(4):2275-2285. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10908-z. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-10908-z
PMID:34635978
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little level 1 evidence exists to guide multimodality treatment in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS), which may lead to significant variation in therapeutic approaches. This analysis aimed to describe national RPS treatment trends and explore potential variability among low-/high-volume hospitals (LVH/HVHs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 5992 patients who underwent resection for primary RPS were retrospectively identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2017). Time trend analyses examined rates of multivisceral resection (MVR), radiation, and chemotherapy use. LVHs were defined as those carrying out fewer than ten resections per year (N = 5433), whereas HVHs were defined as those carrying out ten or more (N = 559). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models compared trends between groups.

RESULTS

MVR was more frequent at HVHs (63.7% versus 43.5%, p < 0.001). Use of radiation varied widely by hospital volume. HVHs more frequently employed preoperative radiation as compared with LVHs (14.7% versus 8.1%, p < 0.001). Throughout the study period, LVHs increased utilization of preoperative radiation (2.6% to 12.0%, p < 0.001) whereas rates at HVHs remained stable. Overall, LVHs utilized postoperative radiation significantly more frequently as compared with HVHs (14.7% versus 2.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). Postoperative radiation at LVHs remained stable until 2013 and sharply declined thereafter (16.7% to 6.9%, p < 0.001). Rates of postoperative radiation use at HVHs remained lower than those at LVHs at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies for resection and radiation use at LVHs have trended towards those of HVHs. Current national implementation of preoperative radiation, MVR, and chemotherapy remains heterogeneous. These findings inform future trial design and support standardization of care.

摘要

背景

腹膜后软组织肉瘤(RPS)的多模式治疗缺乏 1 级证据,这可能导致治疗方法存在显著差异。本分析旨在描述全国 RPS 治疗趋势,并探讨低/高容量医院(LVH/HVH)之间的潜在变异性。

患者和方法

共回顾性分析了国家癌症数据库(2004-2017 年)中 5992 例接受原发性 RPS 切除术的患者。时间趋势分析检查了多脏器切除术(MVR)、放疗和化疗的使用率。LVH 定义为每年行少于 10 例切除术的医院(N=5433),HVH 定义为每年行 10 例或以上切除术的医院(N=559)。描述性统计和逻辑回归模型比较了两组之间的趋势。

结果

HVH 中 MVR 更为常见(63.7%比 43.5%,p<0.001)。放疗的使用因医院容量而异。HVH 比 LVH 更常采用术前放疗(14.7%比 8.1%,p<0.001)。在整个研究期间,LVH 术前放疗的使用率逐渐增加(从 2.6%增加到 12.0%,p<0.001),而 HVH 的使用率保持稳定。总体而言,LVH 术后放疗的使用率明显高于 HVH(分别为 14.7%和 2.7%,p<0.001)。LVH 术后放疗使用率一直保持稳定,直到 2013 年急剧下降(从 16.7%降至 6.9%,p<0.001)。HVH 术后放疗使用率一直低于 LVH。

结论

LVH 切除和放疗策略的趋势与 HVH 相似。目前全国范围内术前放疗、MVR 和化疗的应用仍存在异质性。这些发现为未来的试验设计提供了信息,并支持了护理的标准化。

相似文献

1
National Trends in Treatment for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Modern Appraisal of Variability in Therapeutic Strategies.腹膜后软组织肉瘤治疗的国家趋势:治疗策略变化的现代评估。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;29(4):2275-2285. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10908-z. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Treatment at low-volume hospitals is associated with reduced short-term and long-term outcomes for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.低容量医院的治疗与腹膜后肉瘤患者的短期和长期预后降低有关。
Cancer. 2018 Dec 1;124(23):4495-4503. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31699. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
3
Regionalization of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery to High-Volume Hospitals: Missed Opportunities for Outcome Improvement.将腹膜后肉瘤手术区域化至高容量医院:错失改善结局的机会。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Mar;15(3):e247-e261. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00349. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
4
Impact of hospital volume on failure to rescue for complications requiring reoperation after elective colorectal surgery: multicentre propensity score-matched cohort study.择期结直肠手术后因需要再次手术的并发症而导致抢救失败的医院容量影响:多中心倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BJS Open. 2024 Mar 1;8(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae025.
5
Associations Between Hospital Volume and Overall Survival After Surgery in Older Patients with Breast Cancer.老年乳腺癌患者手术后的医院容量与总体生存率之间的关联。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6462-6470. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13725-8. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
6
Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths.向大型医院的选择性转诊:估计潜在可避免的死亡人数。
JAMA. 2000 Mar 1;283(9):1159-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.9.1159.
7
Impact of hospital volume on local recurrence and distant metastasis in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy in Sweden.瑞典行根治性膀胱切除术的膀胱癌患者中,医院手术量对局部复发和远处转移的影响。
Scand J Urol. 2013 Dec;47(6):483-90. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.787118. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
8
Identifying the Minimum Volume Threshold for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection: Merging National Data with Consensus Expert Opinion.确定腹膜后软组织肉瘤切除术的最小体积阈值:合并国家数据与共识专家意见。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jan;230(1):151-160.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
9
Morbidity, mortality and temporal trends in the surgical management of retroperitoneal sarcoma: An ACS-NSQIP follow up analysis.腹膜后肉瘤外科治疗的发病率、死亡率及时间趋势:一项美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划的随访分析
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;120(4):753-760. doi: 10.1002/jso.25649. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
10
Combined management of retroperitoneal sarcoma with dose intensification radiotherapy and resection: long-term results of a prospective trial.剂量强化放疗联合手术治疗腹膜后肉瘤:一项前瞻性试验的长期结果
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jan;110(1):165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.041. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A multimodal neural network with gradient blending improves predictions of survival and metastasis in sarcoma.具有梯度融合的多模态神经网络可改善肉瘤生存和转移的预测。
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Sep 5;8(1):188. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00695-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Differentiation Changes and Outcomes at Time of First Recurrence of Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma by Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG).经 Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group(TARPSWG)分析,腹膜后脂肪肉瘤首次复发时的分化变化及结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7854-7863. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10024-y. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
Defining the role of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in high-risk retroperitoneal sarcoma: A multi-institutional study from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group.定义新辅助全身治疗在高危腹膜后肉瘤中的作用:来自 TransatlanticAustralasian 腹膜后肉瘤工作组的多机构研究。
Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):729-738. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33323. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
3
Evaluation of Preoperative Chemotherapy or Radiation and Overall Survival in Patients With Nonmetastatic, Resectable Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.评价非转移性、可切除的腹膜后肉瘤患者的术前化疗或放疗与总体生存率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2025529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25529.
4
Radical excision for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: A national propensity-matched outcomes analysis.腹膜后软组织肉瘤的根治性切除术:全国倾向匹配结局分析。
Surgery. 2020 Nov;168(5):831-837. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.05.031. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
5
Identifying the Minimum Volume Threshold for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection: Merging National Data with Consensus Expert Opinion.确定腹膜后软组织肉瘤切除术的最小体积阈值:合并国家数据与共识专家意见。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jan;230(1):151-160.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
6
Hospital Volume Threshold for the Treatment of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.腹膜后肉瘤治疗的医院容量阈值。
Anticancer Res. 2019 Apr;39(4):2007-2014. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13311.
7
Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Influences of Histology, Grade, and Size.腹膜后肉瘤的放射治疗:组织学、分级和大小的影响
Sarcoma. 2018 Dec 5;2018:7972389. doi: 10.1155/2018/7972389. eCollection 2018.
8
Regionalization of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery to High-Volume Hospitals: Missed Opportunities for Outcome Improvement.将腹膜后肉瘤手术区域化至高容量医院:错失改善结局的机会。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Mar;15(3):e247-e261. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00349. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
9
Treatment at low-volume hospitals is associated with reduced short-term and long-term outcomes for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.低容量医院的治疗与腹膜后肉瘤患者的短期和长期预后降低有关。
Cancer. 2018 Dec 1;124(23):4495-4503. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31699. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
10
The Volume-Outcome Relationship in Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Evidence of Improved Short- and Long-Term Outcomes at High-Volume Institutions.腹膜后软组织肉瘤的体积-预后关系:高容量机构短期和长期预后改善的证据。
Sarcoma. 2018 Jul 24;2018:3056562. doi: 10.1155/2018/3056562. eCollection 2018.