• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大型自闭症队列 SPARK 中推断认知障碍。

Imputing cognitive impairment in SPARK, a large autism cohort.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Autism Res. 2022 Jan;15(1):156-170. doi: 10.1002/aur.2622. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1002/aur.2622
PMID:34636158
Abstract

Diverse large cohorts are necessary for dissecting subtypes of autism, and intellectual disability is one of the most robust endophenotypes for analysis. However, current cognitive assessment methods are not feasible at scale. We developed five commonly used machine learning models to predict cognitive impairment (FSIQ<80 and FSIQ<70) and FSIQ scores among 521 children with autism using parent-reported online surveys in SPARK, and evaluated them in an independent set (n = 1346) with a missing data rate up to 70%. We assessed accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity by comparing predicted cognitive levels against clinical IQ data. The elastic-net model has good performance (AUC = 0.876, sensitivity = 0.772, specificity = 0.803) using 129 predictive features to impute cognitive impairment (FSIQ<80). Top-ranked predictive features included parent-reported language and cognitive levels, age at autism diagnosis, and history of services. Prediction of FSIQ<70 and FSIQ scores also showed good performance. We show cognitive levels can be imputed with high accuracy for children with autism, using commonly collected parent-reported data and standardized surveys. The current model offers a method for large-scale autism studies seeking estimates of cognitive ability when standardized psychometric testing is not feasible. LAY SUMMARY: Children with autism who have more severe learning challenges or cognitive impairment have different needs that are important to consider in research studies. When children in our study were missing standardized cognitive testing scores, we were able to use machine learning with other information to correctly "guess" when they have cognitive impairment about 80% of the time. We can use this information in research in the future to develop more appropriate treatments for children with autism and cognitive impairment.

摘要

为了剖析自闭症亚型,需要有多样化的大样本群体,而智力障碍是最稳健的分析内表型之一。然而,目前的认知评估方法在规模上不可行。我们开发了五种常用的机器学习模型,使用 SPARK 中的家长在线调查来预测 521 名自闭症儿童的认知障碍(FSIQ<80 和 FSIQ<70)和 FSIQ 评分,并在具有高达 70%缺失数据率的独立样本(n=1346)中对其进行评估。我们通过将预测的认知水平与临床智商数据进行比较来评估准确性、敏感性和特异性。弹性网络模型使用 129 个预测特征来进行认知障碍(FSIQ<80)的推断,具有良好的性能(AUC=0.876,敏感性=0.772,特异性=0.803)。排名靠前的预测特征包括家长报告的语言和认知水平、自闭症诊断年龄以及服务史。FSIQ<70 和 FSIQ 评分的预测也表现出良好的性能。我们表明,使用常见的家长报告数据和标准化调查,可以高度准确地推断自闭症儿童的认知水平。目前的模型为寻求在标准化心理测量测试不可行时估算认知能力的大规模自闭症研究提供了一种方法。

相似文献

1
Imputing cognitive impairment in SPARK, a large autism cohort.在大型自闭症队列 SPARK 中推断认知障碍。
Autism Res. 2022 Jan;15(1):156-170. doi: 10.1002/aur.2622. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Agreement of parent-reported cognitive level with standardized measures among children with autism spectrum disorder.家长报告的认知水平与自闭症谱系障碍儿童标准化测量的一致性。
Autism Res. 2023 Jun;16(6):1210-1224. doi: 10.1002/aur.2934. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
Utility of an abbreviated version of the stanford-binet intelligence scales (5 ed.) in estimating 'full scale' IQ for young children with autism spectrum disorder.斯坦福-比奈智力量表(第 5 版)简编版在评估自闭症谱系障碍幼儿“全量表”智商方面的效用。
Autism Res. 2018 Mar;11(3):503-508. doi: 10.1002/aur.1911. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Complex Interplay Between Cognitive Ability and Social Motivation in Predicting Social Skill: A Unique Role for Social Motivation in Children With Autism.认知能力与社会动机在预测社交技能方面的复杂相互作用:社会动机在自闭症儿童中的独特作用。
Autism Res. 2021 Jan;14(1):86-92. doi: 10.1002/aur.2409. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
5
Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities.确定16p11.2重复对认知、行为和合并症的影响。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;73(1):20-30. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2123.
6
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.
7
Developmental profiles of preschool children with delayed language development.语言发育迟缓学龄前儿童的发育概况。
Korean J Pediatr. 2014 Aug;57(8):363-9. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2014.57.8.363. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
8
The misnomer of 'high functioning autism': Intelligence is an imprecise predictor of functional abilities at diagnosis.“高功能自闭症”的误用:在诊断时,智力是功能能力的一个不精确预测指标。
Autism. 2020 Jan;24(1):221-232. doi: 10.1177/1362361319852831. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
9
Utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination in predicting general intellectual abilities.蒙特利尔认知评估量表和简易精神状态检查表在预测一般智力能力方面的效用。
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2014 Sep;27(3):148-54. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000035.
10
Discrepancy between WISC-III and WISC-IV Cognitive Profile in Autism Spectrum: What Does It Reveal about Autistic Cognition?自闭症谱系中韦氏儿童智力量表第三版(WISC-III)与韦氏儿童智力量表第四版(WISC-IV)认知剖面图的差异:它揭示了关于自闭症认知的哪些信息?
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 16;10(12):e0144645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144645. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of sialic acid supplementation in early life in autism model rats.早期补充唾液酸对自闭症模型大鼠的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 12;15(1):8576. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93550-z.
2
Contribution of autosomal rare and de novo variants to sex differences in autism.常染色体罕见变异和新生变异对自闭症性别差异的影响。
Am J Hum Genet. 2025 Mar 6;112(3):599-614. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.01.016. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
3
Remote monitoring of social attention in neurogenetic syndromes and idiopathic neurodevelopmental disability.神经遗传综合征和特发性神经发育障碍中社会注意力的远程监测。
Autism Res. 2025 Feb;18(2):334-348. doi: 10.1002/aur.3290. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
4
Large-scale metagenomic analysis of oral microbiomes reveals markers for autism spectrum disorders.大规模宏基因组分析口腔微生物组揭示自闭症谱系障碍的标志物。
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 11;15(1):9743. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53934-7.
5
Characterizing associations between emotion dysregulation, anxiety, and repetitive behaviors in autistic youth with intellectual disability.描述智障自闭症青年情绪失调、焦虑与重复性行为之间的关联。
Autism Res. 2024 Sep;17(9):1810-1817. doi: 10.1002/aur.3207. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
6
Contribution of autosomal rare and variants to sex differences in autism.常染色体罕见变异对自闭症性别差异的影响。
medRxiv. 2024 Apr 16:2024.04.13.24305713. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.13.24305713.
7
Impact of Receiving Genetic Diagnoses on Parents' Perceptions of Their Children with Autism and Intellectual Disability.接受基因诊断对父母对其患有自闭症和智力残疾子女认知的影响。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Jan;55(1):284-296. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-06195-0. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
8
Parents' views of benefits and limitations of receiving genetic diagnoses for their offspring.家长对为子女接受基因诊断的好处和局限性的看法。
Child Care Health Dev. 2024 Jan;50(1):e13212. doi: 10.1111/cch.13212. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
9
Receiving de novo genetic diagnoses for autism with intellectual disability: parents' views of impacts on families' reproductive decisions.获得针对伴有智力障碍的自闭症的新发基因诊断:父母对其对家庭生育决策影响的看法。
J Community Genet. 2024 Feb;15(1):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00679-3. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
10
Characterizing subdomains of insistence on sameness in autistic youth.描述孤独症青年坚持同一性的子领域。
Autism Res. 2023 Dec;16(12):2326-2335. doi: 10.1002/aur.3033. Epub 2023 Sep 21.