Servetto Alberto, Santaniello Antonio, Napolitano Fabiana, Foschini Francesca, Marciano Roberta, Mozzillo Eleonora, Cascetta Priscilla, Amato Anna Rita, Augurio Maria Rosaria, Maresca Lucia, De Placido Pietro, De Placido Sabino, Formisano Luigi, Bianco Roberto
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Department of Medicine, University of Salerno, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio Ruggi d'Aragona, 84125 Salerno, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;13(19):4939. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194939.
Patients with locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) do not present distant metastases but are not eligible for surgery upfront. Chemotherapy regimens, such as FOLFIRINOX (FFN) or nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GemNab) in combination with loco-regional treatments are generally used in this setting. However, the best treatment choice is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed the information of 225 patients with stage II-III PDAC treated at our institution between October 2011 and December 2020. A total of 94 patients with LA PDAC who are non-eligible for surgery upfront received neoadjuvant FFN or GemNab. Of the 67 patients receiving FFN, 28 (41.8%) underwent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy. Of the 27 patients treated with GemNab, 6 (22.2%) became eligible for resection. The median overall survival (OS) was 85.1 weeks and 54.3 weeks in the FFN and GemNab groups, respectively (HR = 0.54, = 0.0109). The median OS was 189.7 weeks and 76.4 weeks in the resected and unresected cohorts, respectively (HR = 0.25, < 0.0001). Neutropenia (37.3%), anemia (6.0%), and diarrhea (6.0%) in the FFN group and neutropenia (22.2%) and thrombocytopenia (18.5%) in the GemNab groups were the most frequent grade 3-4 side effects. Higher rates of thrombocytosis ( < 0.0001) and peripheral edema ( < 0.0001) were observed in the GemNab group. Our results suggest that the use of FFN is associated with more favorable clinical outcomes than GemNab for patients with LA PDAC. Future randomized and controlled clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the role of these regimens and loco-regional treatments in this setting.
局部晚期(LA)胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者不存在远处转移,但不符合 upfront 手术条件。在这种情况下,通常使用化疗方案,如 FOLFIRINOX(FFN)或白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨(GemNab)并结合局部区域治疗。然而,最佳治疗选择尚不清楚。我们回顾性分析了 2011 年 10 月至 2020 年 12 月在我院接受治疗的 225 例 II - III 期 PDAC 患者的信息。共有 94 例不符合 upfront 手术条件的 LA PDAC 患者接受了新辅助 FFN 或 GemNab 治疗。在接受 FFN 治疗的 67 例患者中,28 例(41.8%)在新辅助治疗后接受了手术。在接受 GemNab 治疗的 27 例患者中,6 例(22.2%)符合手术切除条件。FFN 组和 GemNab 组的中位总生存期(OS)分别为 85.1 周和 54.3 周(HR = 0.54, = 0.0109)。切除组和未切除组的中位 OS 分别为 189.7 周和 76.4 周(HR = 0.25, < 0.0001)。FFN 组中最常见的 3 - 4 级副作用为中性粒细胞减少(37.3%)、贫血(6.0%)和腹泻(6.0%),GemNab 组为中性粒细胞减少(22.2%)和血小板减少(18.5%)。GemNab 组观察到更高的血小板增多症发生率( < 0.0001)和外周水肿发生率( < 0.0001)。我们的结果表明,对于 LA PDAC 患者,使用 FFN 比 GemNab 具有更有利的临床结局。未来需要进行随机对照临床试验,以进一步阐明这些方案和局部区域治疗在此情况下的作用。