• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估中文公共卫生信息的传播效果:为国际卫生专业人员开发自动决策辅助工具。

Assessing Communicative Effectiveness of Public Health Information in Chinese: Developing Automatic Decision Aids for International Health Professionals.

机构信息

School of Languages and Cultures, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia.

Department of African Studies, The University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 30;18(19):10329. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910329.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph181910329
PMID:34639643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8508186/
Abstract

Effective multilingual communication of authoritative health information plays an important role in helping to reduce health disparities and inequalities in developed and developing countries. Health information communication from the World Health Organization is governed by key principles including health information relevance, credibility, understandability, actionability, accessibility. Multilingual health information developed under these principles provide valuable benchmarks to assess the quality of health resources developed by local health authorities. In this paper, we developed machine learning classifiers for health professionals with or without Chinese proficiency to assess public-oriented health information in Chinese based on the definition of effective health communication by the WHO. We compared our optimized classifier (SVM) with the state-of-art Chinese readability classifier (Chinese Readability Index Explorer CRIE 3.0), and classifiers adapted from established English readability formula, Gunning Fog Index, Automated Readability Index. Our optimized classifier achieved statistically significant higher area under the receiver operator curve (AUC of ROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity than those of SVM using CRIE 3.0 features and SVM using linguistic features of Gunning Fog Index and Automated Readability Index (ARI). The statistically improved performance of our optimized classifier compared to that of SVM classifiers adapted from popular readability formula suggests that evaluation of health communication effectiveness as defined by the principles of the WHO is more complex than information readability assessment. Our SVM classifier validated on health information covering diverse topics (environmental health, infectious diseases, pregnancy, maternity care, non-communicable diseases, tobacco control) can aid effectively in the automatic assessment of original, translated Chinese public health information of whether they satisfy or not the current international standard of effective health communication as set by the WHO.

摘要

有效的多语种权威健康信息传播在帮助减少发达国家和发展中国家的健康差距和不平等方面发挥着重要作用。世界卫生组织的健康信息传播受包括健康信息相关性、可信度、可理解性、可操作性和可及性在内的关键原则的约束。在这些原则下开发的多语种健康信息为评估地方卫生当局开发的健康资源的质量提供了有价值的基准。在本文中,我们为有或没有中文水平的卫生专业人员开发了机器学习分类器,根据世界卫生组织对有效健康沟通的定义,用中文评估面向公众的健康信息。我们将我们优化后的分类器(支持向量机)与最先进的中文可读性分类器(中文可读性指数探索器 3.0,Chinese Readability Index Explorer CRIE 3.0)进行了比较,并将从已建立的英语可读性公式(Gunning Fog Index、Automated Readability Index)改编的分类器与 SVM 进行了比较。我们优化后的分类器的接收者操作特征曲线(ROC 曲线下的 AUC)、准确性、敏感性和特异性均显著高于基于 CRIE 3.0 特征的 SVM 分类器和基于 Gunning Fog Index 和 Automated Readability Index 语言特征的 SVM 分类器。与基于流行可读性公式的 SVM 分类器相比,我们优化后的分类器的性能有统计学上的提高,这表明,根据世卫组织的原则评估健康信息传播的有效性比信息可读性评估更为复杂。我们在涵盖不同主题(环境卫生、传染病、妊娠、产妇保健、非传染性疾病、烟草控制)的健康信息上验证的 SVM 分类器,可以有效地帮助自动评估原始的、翻译后的中文公共卫生信息是否符合当前世卫组织设定的有效健康信息传播的国际标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c2e/8508186/eadbca659dd1/ijerph-18-10329-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c2e/8508186/eadbca659dd1/ijerph-18-10329-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c2e/8508186/eadbca659dd1/ijerph-18-10329-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Communicative Effectiveness of Public Health Information in Chinese: Developing Automatic Decision Aids for International Health Professionals.评估中文公共卫生信息的传播效果:为国际卫生专业人员开发自动决策辅助工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 30;18(19):10329. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910329.
2
Predicting Health Material Accessibility: Development of Machine Learning Algorithms.预测卫生材料可及性:机器学习算法的开发
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Sep 1;9(9):e29175. doi: 10.2196/29175.
3
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
4
Predicting the Linguistic Accessibility of Chinese Health Translations: Machine Learning Algorithm Development.预测中文健康翻译的语言可及性:机器学习算法开发
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Oct 7;9(10):e30588. doi: 10.2196/30588.
5
Evaluation of the quality and readability of online information about breast cancer in China.评价中国关于乳腺癌的网络信息质量和可读性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):858-864. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
6
Automatic Diagnosis of Mental Healthcare Information Actionability: Developing Binary Classifiers.自动诊断精神保健信息可操作性:开发二进制分类器。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;18(20):10743. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010743.
7
Evaluation of quality and readability of over-the-counter medication package inserts.评价非处方药说明书的质量和可读性。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Sep;18(9):3560-3567. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
8
Developing Machine Learning and Statistical Tools to Evaluate the Accessibility of Public Health Advice on Infectious Diseases among Vulnerable People.开发机器学习和统计工具,以评估弱势群体获取传染病公共卫生建议的可及性。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Dec 17;2021:1916690. doi: 10.1155/2021/1916690. eCollection 2021.
9
Online decision aids for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: systematic search, evaluation of quality and suitability for low health literacy patients.用于原发性心血管疾病预防的在线决策辅助工具:系统检索、质量评估及对健康素养低的患者的适用性
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e025173. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025173.
10
Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.评估关于儿童胸痛的在线资料的可读性、可理解性和质量。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Dec;179(12):1881-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03772-8. Epub 2020 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Readability Analysis of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Patient Educational Brochures.美国眼整形重建外科学会患者教育手册可读性分析。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 2;37(1):77-82. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1919721. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
Help or hinder? An assessment of the accessibility, usability, reliability and readability of disability funding website information for Australian mental health consumers.帮助还是阻碍?对澳大利亚心理健康消费者残疾资助网站信息的可及性、可用性、可靠性和可读性的评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Sep;29(5):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13192. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
评估关于儿童胸痛的在线资料的可读性、可理解性和质量。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Dec;179(12):1881-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03772-8. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
4
Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.澳大利亚宫颈筛查计划更新后的基于网络的健康信息:可读性、可理解性和可信度评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e16701. doi: 10.2196/16701.
5
Readability and Understandability Analysis of Online Materials Related to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.腹主动脉瘤修复相关在线材料的可读性和可理解性分析
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2020 Feb;54(2):111-117. doi: 10.1177/1538574419879855. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
6
Understandability, actionability, and readability of online patient education materials about diabetes mellitus.糖尿病在线患者教育资料的可理解性、可操作性和可读性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jan 25;76(3):182-186. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy021.
7
Assessing the Understandability and Actionability of Online Neurosurgical Patient Education Materials.评估在线神经外科学患者教育材料的易懂性和可操作性。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Oct;130:e588-e597. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.166. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
8
CRIE: An automated analyzer for Chinese texts.CRIE:一款用于中文文本的自动分析器。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1238-1251. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0649-1.
9
Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information.患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)的开发:一种针对印刷和视听患者信息的可理解性和可操作性的新测量方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
10
Constructing and validating readability models: the method of integrating multilevel linguistic features with machine learning.构建和验证可读性模型:将多层次语言特征与机器学习相结合的方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Jun;47(2):340-54. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0459-x.