Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, 1601 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.
Department of Health & Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 6;21(19):6644. doi: 10.3390/s21196644.
Age-related mobility research often highlights significant mobility differences comparing neurotypical young and older adults, while neglecting to report mobility outcomes for middle-aged adults. Moreover, these analyses regularly do not determine which measures of mobility can discriminate groups into their age brackets. Thus, the current study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis for commonly performed aspects of mobility (walking, turning, sit-to-stand, and balance) to determine which variables were significantly different and furthermore, able to discriminate between neurotypical young adults (YAs), middle-aged adults (MAAs), and older adults (OAs). This study recruited 20 YAs, 20 MAAs, and 20 OAs. Participants came into the laboratory and completed mobility testing while wearing wireless inertial sensors. Mobility tests assessed included three distinct two-minute walks, 360° turns, five times sit-to-stands, and a clinical balance test, capturing 99 distinct mobility metrics. Of the various mobility tests assessed, only 360° turning measures demonstrated significance between YAs and MAAs, although the capacity to discriminate between groups was achieved for gait and turning measures. A variety of mobility measures demonstrated significance between MAAs and OAs, and furthermore discrimination was achieved for each mobility test. These results indicate greater mobility differences between MAAs and OAs, although discrimination is achievable for both group comparisons.
年龄相关性移动性研究经常强调神经典型的年轻和老年成年人之间存在显著的移动性差异,而忽略了报告中年成年人的移动性结果。此外,这些分析通常不确定哪些移动性测量可以将组分配到其年龄组中。因此,本研究旨在对常见的移动性方面(行走、转弯、坐立和平衡)进行全面分析,以确定哪些变量存在显著差异,并且能够区分神经典型的年轻成年人(YAs)、中年成年人(MAAs)和老年成年人(OAs)。该研究招募了 20 名 YAs、20 名 MAAs 和 20 名 OAs。参与者进入实验室并佩戴无线惯性传感器完成移动性测试。移动性测试评估包括三个不同的两分钟步行、360°转弯、五次坐立和一项临床平衡测试,共捕获 99 个不同的移动性指标。在评估的各种移动性测试中,只有 360°转弯测量在 YAs 和 MAAs 之间显示出显著差异,尽管对于步态和转弯测量已经实现了区分群体的能力。多种移动性测量在 MAAs 和 OAs 之间显示出显著差异,并且对于每个移动性测试都实现了区分。这些结果表明 MAAs 和 OAs 之间存在更大的移动性差异,尽管对于这两组比较都可以实现区分。