• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纯音辨别与人工耳蜗和滤波带展宽。

Pure tone discrimination with cochlear implants and filter-band spread.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), HNO-Klinik, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 12;11(1):20236. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99799-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-99799-4
PMID:34642437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8511217/
Abstract

For many cochlear implant (CI) users, frequency discrimination is still challenging. We studied the effect of frequency differences relative to the electrode frequency bands on pure tone discrimination. A single-center, prospective, controlled, psychoacoustic exploratory study was conducted in a tertiary university referral center. Thirty-four patients with Cochlear Ltd. and MED-EL CIs and 19 age-matched normal-hearing control subjects were included. Two sinusoidal tones were presented with varying frequency differences. The reference tone frequency was chosen according to the center frequency of basal or apical electrodes. Discrimination abilities were psychophysically measured in a three-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure (3I-2AFC) for various CI electrodes. Hit rates were measured, particularly with respect to discrimination abilities at the corner frequency of the electrode frequency-bands. The mean rate of correct decision concerning pitch difference was about 60% for CI users and about 90% for the normal-hearing control group. In CI users, the difference limen was two semitones, while normal-hearing participants detected the difference of one semitone. No influence of the corner frequency of the CI electrodes was found. In CI users, pure tone discrimination seems to be independent of tone positions relative to the corner frequency of the electrode frequency-band. Differences of 2 semitones can be distinguished within one electrode.

摘要

对于许多人工耳蜗(CI)使用者来说,频率辨别仍然具有挑战性。我们研究了相对于电极频带的频率差异对纯音辨别能力的影响。在一家三级大学转诊中心进行了单中心、前瞻性、对照、心理声学探索性研究。共纳入 34 名 Cochlear Ltd. 和 MED-EL 人工耳蜗使用者和 19 名年龄匹配的正常听力对照组受试者。两个正弦音呈现不同的频率差异。参考音频率根据基底或顶点电极的中心频率选择。使用三间隔、二选一、强制选择程序(3I-2AFC)在各种 CI 电极上进行心理物理测量辨别能力。测量了准确率,特别是针对电极频带拐角频率处的辨别能力。CI 用户的音高差正确判断率约为 60%,正常听力对照组约为 90%。在 CI 用户中,差别阈限为两个半音,而正常听力参与者可以检测到一个半音的差异。未发现 CI 电极拐角频率的影响。在 CI 用户中,纯音辨别能力似乎与相对于电极频带拐角频率的音调位置无关。在一个电极内可以区分 2 个半音的差异。

相似文献

1
Pure tone discrimination with cochlear implants and filter-band spread.纯音辨别与人工耳蜗和滤波带展宽。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 12;11(1):20236. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99799-4.
2
Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.有残余听力的人工耳蜗植入受试者的声电音高比较。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006 Jun;7(2):110-24. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0027-2. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
3
Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones.使用交叉淡入合成音对人工耳蜗使用者和正常听力受试者的音色辨别。
J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Aug 15;199(2):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
4
Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.失匹配负波(MMN)客观地反映了听力正常的听众和人工耳蜗使用者的音色辨别阈值。
Brain Res. 2014 Oct 24;1586:143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.08.045. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
5
Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: Influence of intracochlear stimulation site.正常听力和人工耳蜗使用者在低脉冲率下的速率辨别:蜗内刺激部位的影响
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Apr;139(4):1578. doi: 10.1121/1.4944564.
6
Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.华盛顿大学音乐感知临床评估测试的开发与验证
Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):411-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bc0.
7
Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience.双模式人工耳蜗使用者的音调适应模式:随时间变化及积累经验后
Ear Hear. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):e23-34. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000114.
8
Pitch matching in bimodal cochlear implant patients: Effects of frequency, spectral envelope, and level.双模式人工耳蜗植入患者的音高匹配:频率、频谱包络和强度的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Nov;142(5):2854. doi: 10.1121/1.5009443.
9
Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.单侧耳聋人工耳蜗使用者的电-声音高比较:频率-位置函数与速率音高
Hear Res. 2014 Mar;309:26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
10
Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.人工耳蜗植入者和正常听力者的心理声学及音素识别测量
Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):27-44. doi: 10.1177/1084713813477244. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
How Switching Musical Instruments Affects Pitch Discrimination for Cochlear Implant Users.更换乐器如何影响人工耳蜗使用者的音高辨别能力。
Ear Hear. 2025;46(4):997-1008. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001640. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Effect of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth on Speech Perception Outcomes: A Systematic Review.人工耳蜗电极插入深度对言语感知结果的影响:一项系统评价。
Otol Neurotol Open. 2023 Dec 14;3(4):e045. doi: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000045. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Best frequencies and temporal delays are similar across the low-frequency regions of the guinea pig cochlea.

本文引用的文献

1
Cochlear Implant Rate Pitch and Melody Perception as a Function of Place and Number of Electrodes.人工耳蜗植入率、音高和旋律感知与电极位置和数量的关系
Trends Hear. 2016 Apr 19;20:2331216516643085. doi: 10.1177/2331216516643085.
2
Frequency-place map for electrical stimulation in cochlear implants: Change over time.人工耳蜗电刺激的频率-位置图:随时间的变化
Hear Res. 2015 Aug;326:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
3
Melodic interval perception by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.听力正常的听众和人工耳蜗使用者对旋律音程的感知。
豚鼠耳蜗低频区的最佳频率和时间延迟相似。
Sci Adv. 2022 Sep 23;8(38):eabq2773. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq2773.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Oct;136(4):1831-44. doi: 10.1121/1.4894738.
4
Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users.耳蜗植入使用者的音乐感知的技术、生物和声学限制。
Hear Res. 2014 Feb;308:13-26. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 7.
5
The effects of fine structure stimulation on pitch perception with cochlear implants.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2011 May;12 Suppl 1:S70-2. doi: 10.1179/146701011X13001035753092.
6
Musical pitch and lexical tone perception with cochlear implants.人工耳蜗对音乐音高和词汇声调的感知。
Int J Audiol. 2011 Apr;50(4):270-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.542490. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
7
Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.人工耳蜗使用者与音乐感知相关的听觉能力。
Ear Hear. 2010 Dec;31(6):796-805. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e8b7bd.
8
Temporal fine structure in cochlear implants: preliminary speech perception results in Cantonese-speaking implant users.人工耳蜗中的时间精细结构:粤语使用者人工耳蜗植入者的初步言语感知结果
Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Sep;130(9):1031-9. doi: 10.3109/00016481003591731.
9
Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.华盛顿大学音乐感知临床评估测试的开发与验证
Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):411-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bc0.
10
Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.人工耳蜗使用者的自由声场频率辨别能力。
Hear Res. 2008 Oct;244(1-2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Jul 26.