• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息误导的社会运动:新冠疫情期间作为网络危害的阴谋论叙事大规模映射

Disinformed social movements: A large-scale mapping of conspiracy narratives as online harms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Darius Philipp, Urquhart Michael

机构信息

Centre for Digital Governance, Hertie School, Berlin, Germany.

Media Measurement Limited, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Online Soc Netw Media. 2021 Nov;26:100174. doi: 10.1016/j.osnem.2021.100174. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.osnem.2021.100174
PMID:34642647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8495371/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused high uncertainty regarding appropriate treatments and public policy reactions. This uncertainty provided a perfect breeding ground for spreading conspiratorial anti-science narratives based on disinformation. Disinformation on public health may alter the population's hesitance to vaccinations, counted among the ten most severe threats to global public health by the United Nations. We understand conspiracy narratives as a combination of disinformation, misinformation, and rumour that are especially effective in drawing people to believe in post-factual claims and form disinformed social movements. Conspiracy narratives provide a pseudo-epistemic background for disinformed social movements that allow for self-identification and cognitive certainty in a rapidly changing information environment. This study monitors two established conspiracy narratives and their communities on Twitter, the anti-vaccination and anti-5G communities, before and during the first UK lockdown. The study finds that, despite content moderation efforts by Twitter, conspiracy groups were able to proliferate their networks and influence broader public discourses on Twitter, such as #Lockdown in the United Kingdom.

摘要

新冠疫情引发了关于适当治疗方法和公共政策应对措施的高度不确定性。这种不确定性为基于虚假信息传播阴谋论的反科学叙事提供了绝佳的滋生土壤。有关公共卫生的虚假信息可能会改变民众对接种疫苗的犹豫态度,而接种疫苗的犹豫被联合国列为对全球公共卫生最严重的十大威胁之一。我们将阴谋论叙事理解为虚假信息、错误信息和谣言的结合,它们在吸引人们相信后事实主张并形成无知的社会运动方面特别有效。阴谋论叙事为无知的社会运动提供了一个伪认知背景,使人们在快速变化的信息环境中能够进行自我认同并获得认知确定性。本研究在英国首次封锁之前和期间,监测了推特上两个既定的阴谋论叙事及其社群,即反疫苗社群和反5G社群。研究发现,尽管推特进行了内容审核,但阴谋论团体仍能够扩大其网络,并影响推特上更广泛的公众话语,例如英国的#封锁。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/2bf84efec061/gr11_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/bd85e22ca020/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/74eb072370ba/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/17e434d3aac1/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/bb97b9b7420f/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/280a00e215f7/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/0fbe02fa7c58/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/61aa008f9574/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/187a6790acb0/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/cb630787ab52/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/47614b437106/gr10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/2bf84efec061/gr11_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/bd85e22ca020/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/74eb072370ba/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/17e434d3aac1/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/bb97b9b7420f/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/280a00e215f7/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/0fbe02fa7c58/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/61aa008f9574/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/187a6790acb0/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/cb630787ab52/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/47614b437106/gr10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c17/8495371/2bf84efec061/gr11_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Disinformed social movements: A large-scale mapping of conspiracy narratives as online harms during the COVID-19 pandemic.信息误导的社会运动:新冠疫情期间作为网络危害的阴谋论叙事大规模映射
Online Soc Netw Media. 2021 Nov;26:100174. doi: 10.1016/j.osnem.2021.100174. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
2
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
3
Revisited: A Product of Planned Disinformation Amplifying the COVID-19 "infodemic".重新审视:计划制造的假信息的产物,放大了 COVID-19“信息疫情”。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 14;9:649930. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.649930. eCollection 2021.
4
Investigation of COVID-19 Misinformation in Arabic on Twitter: Content Analysis.推特上阿拉伯语新冠疫情虚假信息调查:内容分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Jul 26;2(2):e37007. doi: 10.2196/37007. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
5
Rise of Conspiracy Theories in the Pandemic Times.大流行时期阴谋论的兴起。
Int J Semiot Law. 2022;35(6):2373-2389. doi: 10.1007/s11196-022-09910-9. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
6
Conspiracy vs science: A large-scale analysis of online discussion cascades.阴谋论与科学:在线讨论传播的大规模分析
World Wide Web. 2021;24(2):585-606. doi: 10.1007/s11280-021-00862-x. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science.关于 COVID-19 的错误信息:不同潜在特征的证据,以及与对科学的信任之间的强关联。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10103-x.
8
[Causes of belief in conspiracy narratives and recommendations for successful risk communication in healthcare].[医疗保健领域中对阴谋论的信仰原因及成功进行风险沟通的建议]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 May;65(5):537-544. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03524-z. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
9
A scoping review of COVID-19 online mis/disinformation in Black communities.一项针对 COVID-19 在线错误/虚假信息在黑人群体中的范围综述。
J Glob Health. 2022 Jul 23;12:05026. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05026.
10
A Dynamic Analysis of Conspiratorial Narratives on Twitter During the Pandemic.疫情期间推特上阴谋论叙事的动态分析
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2023 May;26(5):338-345. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0218. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Conspiracy narratives and vaccine hesitancy: a scoping review of prevalence, impact, and interventions.阴谋叙事与疫苗犹豫:流行状况、影响及干预措施的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):3325. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20797-y.
2
Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives-A 3-year study.COVID-19 错误/虚假信息叙述的趋势分析-一项为期 3 年的研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 17;18(11):e0291423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291423. eCollection 2023.
3
Barriers to and facilitators of populational adherence to prevention and control measures of COVID-19 and other respiratory infectious diseases: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Political Partisanship and Antiscience Attitudes in Online Discussions About COVID-19: Twitter Content Analysis.政治党派偏见与新冠疫情线上讨论中的反科学态度:推特内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 14;23(6):e26692. doi: 10.2196/26692.
2
An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter.关于推特上新冠疫情错误信息的探索性研究。
Online Soc Netw Media. 2021 Mar;22:100104. doi: 10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100104. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
3
Social Network Analysis for Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States.美国冠状病毒(COVID-19)的社交网络分析
人口对 COVID-19 和其他呼吸道传染病的预防和控制措施的坚持的障碍和促进因素:定性证据综合。
Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Jun 21;32(168). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0238-2022. Print 2023 Jun 30.
4
Enacting polyvocal scorn in #CovidConspiracy tweets: The orchestration of voices in humorous responses to COVID-19 conspiracy theories.在#新冠阴谋论推文里展现多元嘲讽:对新冠病毒阴谋论的幽默回应中声音的编排
Discourse Context Media. 2023 Apr;52:100670. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100670. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.谁在使推特两极分化?2017年和2021年德国联邦议院选举期间推特上的意识形态两极分化、党派团体与策略性网络竞选活动
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00958-w. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
Aggressive measures, rising inequalities, and mass formation during the COVID-19 crisis: An overview and proposed way forward.在 COVID-19 危机期间采取激进措施、不平等加剧和大规模形成:概述及建议的前进道路。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;10:950965. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.950965. eCollection 2022.
7
Public policy and conspiracies: The case of mandates.公共政策与阴谋论:以强制接种令为例。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Oct;47:101427. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101427. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
8
Use of Twitter Amplifiers by Medical Professionals to Combat Misinformation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.医疗专业人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用 Twitter 放大器来对抗错误信息。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 22;24(7):e38324. doi: 10.2196/38324.
9
Assessment of Attitudes, Main Concerns and Sources of Knowledge Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination in Poland in the Unvaccinated Individuals-A Nationwide Survey.波兰未接种新冠疫苗人群对新冠疫苗接种的态度、主要担忧及知识来源评估——一项全国性调查
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Mar 2;10(3):381. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030381.
Soc Sci Q. 2020 Jul;101(4):1642-1647. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12808. Epub 2020 May 28.
4
Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention.社交媒体上抗击 COVID-19 错误信息:可扩展的准确性提示干预的实验证据。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):770-780. doi: 10.1177/0956797620939054. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
5
Pylons ablaze: Examining the role of 5G COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence.塔台起火:探究 5G 新冠病毒阴谋论信仰与暴力支持的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;59(3):628-640. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12394. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
6
Even covid-19 can't kill the anti-vaccination movement.就连新冠疫情也无法扼杀反疫苗运动。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 4;369:m2184. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2184.
7
Tracking Social Media Discourse About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of a Public Coronavirus Twitter Data Set.追踪社交媒体上关于 COVID-19 大流行的讨论:公共冠状病毒 Twitter 数据集的开发。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 29;6(2):e19273. doi: 10.2196/19273.
8
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
9
Creating COVID-19 Stigma by Referencing the Novel Coronavirus as the "Chinese virus" on Twitter: Quantitative Analysis of Social Media Data.在推特上将新型冠状病毒称为“中国病毒”从而制造新冠病毒污名化:社交媒体数据的定量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19301. doi: 10.2196/19301.
10
Coronavirus Goes Viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 Misinformation Epidemic on Twitter.冠状病毒迅速传播:量化推特上关于新冠疫情的错误信息传播情况
Cureus. 2020 Mar 13;12(3):e7255. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7255.