Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, MET Gateway, Galway, Ireland.
Galway Neuro Technology Centre, Cerenovus, Galway, Ireland.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2022 Mar;32(1):5-12. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01100-7. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
In acute ischemic stroke for large vessel occlusions, delayed or failed access to intracranial occlusions has a negative impact on procedural and clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to identify and quantify access failures and challenges in mechanical thrombectomy.
A systematic literature review of PubMed and Scopus databases from January 2014 to October 2020 was performed. Articles reporting consecutive patients were used to calculate a crude failure rate of femoral and alternative accesses.
A total of 50 articles met the inclusion criteria, totalling 12,838 interventions. Failure to access the occlusion through transfemoral access occurred in 4.4% of patients, most commonly due to challenging supra-aortic vessel anatomy, decreasing to 3.6% when all alternative access routes were attempted. Failed access from alternative routes (direct carotid, radial and brachial approaches) attempted first-line or after failed femoral attempt were reported in 7.3% of patients. The occurrence rate of potentially challenging features (anatomical, diseases or others) ranged from 4.7% to 47.4%, primarily impacting the access time, procedure time, recanalization and clinical outcomes.
Failure to access the occlusion is a significant contributor to failed recanalization, regardless of access routes. Challenging, but eventually successful access is also a relevant factor in procedural and clinical outcomes; however challenging access requires a universal definition to enable quantification, so that methods for procedural optimization can be critically assessed.
在急性缺血性脑卒中的大血管闭塞中,颅内闭塞的延迟或失败的进入会对程序和临床结果产生负面影响。本综述的目的是确定和量化机械血栓切除术的进入失败和挑战。
对 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月期间的 PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库进行了系统的文献回顾。使用报告连续患者的文章来计算股动脉和替代入路的粗失败率。
共有 50 篇文章符合纳入标准,共计 12838 例干预。通过股动脉进入闭塞的失败率为 4.4%,最常见的原因是挑战性的主动脉血管解剖结构,当尝试所有替代入路时,失败率降低至 3.6%。首先尝试或在股动脉尝试失败后尝试替代入路(直接颈动脉、桡动脉和肱动脉途径)的失败入路在 7.3%的患者中报告。潜在挑战性特征(解剖学、疾病或其他)的发生率从 4.7%到 47.4%不等,主要影响进入时间、手术时间、再通和临床结果。
无论入路如何,无法进入闭塞是导致再通失败的一个重要因素。具有挑战性但最终成功的进入也是程序和临床结果的一个相关因素;然而,具有挑战性的进入需要一个通用的定义,以便能够进行量化,从而可以批判性地评估程序优化的方法。