Monrozies M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1978 Dec;7(8):1453-71.
After having made an historical study of the principal works coming from the School in Toulouse concerning obstetrical anaesthesia, one can make an account of the criteria for fetal risk. These have been established by comparing with a standard that determines the physical and biological parameters found in normal labour. The fetal risk has been studied for four types of anaesthesia progressively. These are : general anaesthesia with Pentothal, general anaesthesia with Gamma OH, neuroleptanalgesia and finally epidural anaesthesia. By comparison with a normal standard, the evolution of the parameters concerning uterine contraction, the changes in the fetal heart rate the, acid-base balance of the fetal blood and how it changes, and the Apgar score have been studied for each type of anaesthesia. The same has been done for maternal risk. After having completed this study we have come to the conclusion that there is no single anaesthetic that should particularly be recommended, and that for every phase of labour : before labour starts and after labour has been confirmed, and at the end of the first stage of labour, a different form of anaesthesia may well be indicated. Above all, the skill of the anaesthetist and of the obstetrician influence the efficiency of the anaesthetic.
在对图卢兹学派有关产科麻醉的主要著作进行历史研究之后,可以对胎儿风险标准进行阐述。这些标准是通过与确定正常分娩中所发现的生理和生物学参数的标准进行比较而确立的。已逐步对四种麻醉类型的胎儿风险进行了研究。它们分别是:硫喷妥钠全身麻醉、γ-羟基丁酸钠全身麻醉、神经安定镇痛术以及最后一种硬膜外麻醉。通过与正常标准相比较,针对每种麻醉类型,研究了与子宫收缩有关的参数变化、胎儿心率变化、胎儿血液酸碱平衡及其变化情况,以及阿普加评分。对产妇风险也进行了同样的研究。完成这项研究后,我们得出的结论是,没有哪种单一麻醉方法值得特别推荐,而且在分娩的每个阶段:分娩开始前、分娩确认后以及第一产程结束时,可能都需要不同形式的麻醉。最重要的是,麻醉师和产科医生的技术会影响麻醉效果。