Chen Xuan, Yang Zhiguang, Xiang Guiyuan, Gu Lingna, Qi Ziheng, Wan Bin, Lu Yun, Chang Feng, Zhu Yumei
School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Healthcare Reform, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Jun;22(4):647-654. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.1993062. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab in post-chemoradiotherapy patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC from the Chinese healthcare system perspective.
The study developed a five-health state Markov model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab consolidation therapy in post-chemoradiotherapy patients based on the PACIFIC clinical trial. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty.
Durvalumab consolidation therapy provided an additional 1.22 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with an incremental cost of $24,397 compared to no consolidation therapy in unselected patients. Durvalumab consolidation therapy was cost-effective as it yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $20,000 per QALY gained at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $31,494 per QALY. In the patient subgroup with PD-L1-expressing tumors (≥1%), durvalumab was associated with an ICER of $33,058/QALY, resulting in a slight skewing away from the given cost-effectiveness threshold. The sensitivity analysis showed that ICERs were most sensitive to the cost of durvalumab, the cost of pembrolizumab, and the body weight of patients, regardless of PD-L1 expression selection.
Durvalumab consolidation therapy is likely to be cost-effective in China, which indicates that expensive immunotherapies can gain clinical benefits at a justifiable cost in developing countries as well.
从中国医疗保健系统的角度评估度伐利尤单抗在不可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌放化疗后患者中的成本效益。
该研究建立了一个五健康状态马尔可夫模型,以基于PACIFIC临床试验评估度伐利尤单抗巩固治疗在放化疗后患者中的成本效益。进行了敏感性和情景分析以评估模型的不确定性。
与未选择的患者不进行巩固治疗相比,度伐利尤单抗巩固治疗额外提供了1.22个质量调整生命年(QALY),增量成本为24,397美元。度伐利尤单抗巩固治疗具有成本效益,因为在每QALY支付意愿(WTP)阈值为31,494美元时,其增量成本效益比(ICER)为每获得一个QALY 20,000美元。在肿瘤表达PD-L1(≥1%)的患者亚组中,度伐利尤单抗的ICER为33,058美元/QALY,导致略偏离给定的成本效益阈值。敏感性分析表明,无论PD-L1表达选择如何,ICER对度伐利尤单抗的成本、帕博利珠单抗的成本和患者体重最为敏感。
度伐利尤单抗巩固治疗在中国可能具有成本效益,这表明昂贵的免疫疗法在发展中国家也能以合理的成本获得临床益处。