• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

度伐利尤单抗治疗 III 期非小细胞肺癌的国际成本效果分析。

International Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Durvalumab in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

机构信息

University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida.

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413938. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13938.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13938
PMID:38814640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11140532/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Standard of care for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves definitive chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance therapy with durvalumab. However, the cost of durvalumab has been cited as a barrier to its use in various health systems.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab vs placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC from 4 international payer perspectives (US, Brazil, Singapore, and Spain).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this economic evaluation, a Markov model was designed to compare the lifetime cost-effectiveness of maintenance durvalumab for unresectable stage III NSCLC with that of placebo, using 5-year outcomes data from the PACIFIC randomized placebo-controlled trial. Individual patient data were extracted from the PACIFIC, KEYNOTE-189, ADAURA, ALEX, and REVEL randomized clinical trials to develop a decision-analytic model to determine the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab compared with placebo maintenance therapy over a 10-year time horizon. Direct costs, adverse events, and patient characteristics were based on country-specific payer perspectives and demographic characteristics. The study was conducted from June 1, 2022, through December 27, 2023.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Life-years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated at country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds ([data reported in US$] US: $150 000 per QALY; Brazil: $22 251 per QALY; Singapore: $55 288 per QALY, and Spain: $107 069 per QALY). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to account for parameters of uncertainty. A cost-threshold analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

The US base-case model found that treatment with durvalumab was associated with an increased cost of $114 394 and improved effectiveness of 0.50 QALYs compared with placebo, leading to an ICER of $228 788 per QALY. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, according to base-case models, were $141 146 for Brazil, $153 461 for Singapore, and $125 193 for Spain. Durvalumab price adjustments to the PACIFIC data improved cost-effectiveness in Singapore, with an ICER of $45 164. The model was most sensitive to the utility of durvalumab.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab as maintenance therapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC, the therapy was found to be cost-prohibitive from the perspective of various international payers according to country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds per QALY. The findings of the study suggest that discounted durvalumab acquisition costs, as possible in Singapore, might improve cost-effectiveness globally.

摘要

重要性

不可切除的局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗包括明确的放化疗,随后用度伐鲁单抗进行维持治疗。然而,度伐鲁单抗的成本已被认为是在各种医疗体系中使用它的障碍。

目的

从 4 个国际支付者的角度(美国、巴西、新加坡和西班牙)评估不可切除的 III 期 NSCLC 患者中,度伐鲁单抗与安慰剂作为维持治疗的成本效益。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项经济评估中,设计了一个马尔可夫模型,以比较不可切除的 III 期 NSCLC 患者使用度伐鲁单抗与安慰剂作为维持治疗的终生成本效益,使用 PACIFIC 随机安慰剂对照试验的 5 年结果数据。从 PACIFIC、KEYNOTE-189、ADAURA、ALEX 和 REVEL 随机临床试验中提取患者个体数据,以开发一个决策分析模型,以确定在 10 年时间范围内,与安慰剂维持治疗相比,度伐鲁单抗的成本效益。直接成本、不良事件和患者特征基于国家特定的支付者视角和人口统计学特征。该研究于 2022 年 6 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 27 日进行。

主要结果和措施

在国家特定的支付意愿阈值下(美国:每 QALY 150000 美元;巴西:每 QALY 22251 美元;新加坡:每 QALY 55288 美元,西班牙:每 QALY 107069 美元),估计了寿命年、质量调整生命年(QALYs)、终生成本和增量成本效益比(ICERs)。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析,以考虑不确定性参数。还进行了成本阈值分析。

结果

美国基本案例模型发现,与安慰剂相比,使用度伐鲁单抗治疗的成本增加了 114394 美元,效果提高了 0.50 QALY,导致每 QALY 的 ICER 为 228788 美元。根据基本案例模型,巴西的增量成本效益比为 141146 美元,新加坡为 153461 美元,西班牙为 125193 美元。对 PACIFIC 数据进行度伐鲁单抗价格调整可提高新加坡的成本效益,ICER 为 45164 美元。该模型对度伐鲁单抗的效用最为敏感。

结论和相关性

在这项关于不可切除的 III 期 NSCLC 患者中,使用度伐鲁单抗作为维持治疗的成本效益分析中,根据每个 QALY 的国家特定支付意愿阈值,该疗法被认为在各种国际支付者中是成本不可承受的。研究结果表明,在新加坡,可能会降低度伐鲁单抗的折扣获得成本,从而在全球范围内提高成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8157/11140532/62316354865d/jamanetwopen-e2413938-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8157/11140532/4809a9ca02f6/jamanetwopen-e2413938-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8157/11140532/27bca019f907/jamanetwopen-e2413938-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8157/11140532/62316354865d/jamanetwopen-e2413938-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8157/11140532/4809a9ca02f6/jamanetwopen-e2413938-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8157/11140532/27bca019f907/jamanetwopen-e2413938-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8157/11140532/62316354865d/jamanetwopen-e2413938-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
International Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Durvalumab in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.度伐利尤单抗治疗 III 期非小细胞肺癌的国际成本效果分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413938. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13938.
2
Cost-effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Durvalumab Consolidation Therapy Versus No Consolidation Therapy After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.度伐利尤单抗巩固治疗与放化疗后不巩固治疗用于意大利国家卫生服务体系中 III 期非小细胞肺癌的成本效果和净货币收益。
Clin Ther. 2020 May;42(5):830-847. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
3
Cost-effectiveness and Budgetary Consequence Analysis of Durvalumab Consolidation Therapy vs No Consolidation Therapy After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Context of the US Health Care System.在考虑到美国医疗保健系统的情况下,durvalumab 巩固治疗与放化疗后不进行巩固治疗在 III 期非小细胞肺癌中的成本效果和预算后果分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):358-365. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5449.
4
Durvalumab vs placebo consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: An updated PACIFIC trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis.度伐利尤单抗与安慰剂用于III期非小细胞肺癌放化疗后的巩固治疗:基于PACIFIC试验的最新成本效益分析
Lung Cancer. 2020 Aug;146:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC: A US Healthcare Perspective.无法切除的 III 期非小细胞肺癌放化疗后度伐利尤单抗的成本效益:美国医疗保健视角。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Feb 2;19(2):153-162. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7621. Print 2021 Feb.
6
Cost-effectiveness analyses of durvalumab consolidation therapy versus no consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy in stage-III NSCLC.durvalumab 巩固治疗与放化疗后不巩固治疗在 III 期 NSCLC 中的成本效益分析。
Lung Cancer. 2022 Aug;170:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.06.002. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.帕博利珠单抗单药治疗与化疗用于既往未治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2020 Sep;23(9):952-960. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1775620. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
8
Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as a Second-Line Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.帕博利珠单抗作为二线治疗肝细胞癌的成本效益。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033761. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33761.
9
First-Line Durvalumab in Addition to Etoposide and Platinum for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A U.S.-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.广泛期小细胞肺癌中依托泊苷和铂类药物联合一线 durvalumab 治疗:一项基于美国的成本效益分析。
Oncologist. 2021 Nov;26(11):e2013-e2020. doi: 10.1002/onco.13954. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
10
Cost-effectiveness of consolidation durvalumab for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer in Vietnam.在越南,不可切除的 III 期非小细胞肺癌巩固治疗度伐利尤单抗的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 30;14(8):e083895. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083895.

引用本文的文献

1
Multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗作为晚期胆管癌一线治疗的多国成本效益分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 11;13:1597550. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1597550. eCollection 2025.
2
Constructing the cure: engineering the next wave of antibody and cellular immune therapies.构建治愈方法:打造下一代抗体和细胞免疫疗法。
J Immunother Cancer. 2025 Aug 25;13(8):e011761. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2025-011761.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of penpulimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Services Access Inequalities in Brazil Result in Poorer Outcomes for Stage III NSCLC-RELANCE/LACOG 0118.巴西医疗服务获取不平等导致Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌患者的预后更差——RELANCE/LACOG 0118研究
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024 Feb 3;5(3):100646. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100646. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Balancing Investments in Health Care and Social Determinants-The Need for Benefit-Cost Analysis.平衡医疗保健与社会决定因素的投资——效益成本分析的必要性。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Dec 1;4(12):e235055. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5055.
3
Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer in Spain: a nationwide cohort study.
在中国,派安普利单抗联合卡铂-紫杉醇作为转移性鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效益分析。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jul 12;15(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00656-1.
4
NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER: Real-World Population-Based Cohorts' Study.非小细胞肺癌:基于真实世界人群队列的研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;17(4):648. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040648.
西班牙III期非小细胞肺癌患者的真实世界治疗模式和生存结果:一项全国性队列研究。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Oct 31;12(10):2113-2128. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-176. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
4
Modelling Health State Utilities as a Transformation of Time to Death in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.将非小细胞肺癌患者的死亡时间转化为健康状态效用进行建模。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jan;42(1):109-116. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01314-2. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
5
Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis.巴西FDA批准的抗癌药物的上市许可与定价:一项回顾性分析
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 May 17;22:100506. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100506. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Barriers in access to oncology drugs - a global crisis.癌症药物获取障碍——全球危机。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan;20(1):7-15. doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00700-7. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
7
Responding to Health-Improving but Cost-Ineffective Care.应对改善健康但成本效益不佳的医疗服务。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Mar 1;2(3):e210229. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0229.
8
Real-world experience of consolidation durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.III 期非小细胞肺癌同步放化疗后巩固 durvalumab 的真实世界经验。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Nov;13(22):3152-3161. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14667. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
9
End of Life Cost Savings in the Palliative Care Unit Compared to Other Services.安宁疗护病房与其他服务相比的临终成本节约。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Nov;64(5):495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.06.016. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
10
Five-Year Survival Outcomes From the PACIFIC Trial: Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.PACIFIC试验的五年生存结果:III期非小细胞肺癌放化疗后使用度伐利尤单抗治疗
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr 20;40(12):1301-1311. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01308. Epub 2022 Feb 2.