• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持本科护生临床实践中批判性思维发展的技术支持指导模型:一项探索性、灵活混合方法可行性研究方案

Technology-Supported Guidance Model to Support the Development of Critical Thinking Among Undergraduate Nursing Students in Clinical Practice: Protocol of an Exploratory, Flexible Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

作者信息

Zlamal Jaroslav, Gjevjon Edith Roth, Fossum Mariann, Steindal Simen Alexander, Nes Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves

机构信息

Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Oct 13;10(10):e31646. doi: 10.2196/31646.

DOI:10.2196/31646
PMID:34643536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8552102/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critical thinking is an essential set of skills in nursing education, and nursing education therefore needs a sharper focus on effective ways to support the development of these skills, especially through the implementation of technological tools in nursing education.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study protocol is to assess the feasibility of a technology-supported guidance model grounded in the metacognition theory for nursing students in clinical practice.

METHODS

Both quantitative (research questionnaires) and qualitative (focus group interviews) approaches will be used to collect data for a feasibility study with an exploratory, flexible mixed methods design to test a newly developed intervention in clinical practice.

RESULTS

The intervention development was completed in December 2020. The intervention will be tested in 3 independent nursing homes in Norway.

CONCLUSIONS

By determining the feasibility of a technology-supported guidance model for nursing students in clinical practice, the results will provide information on the acceptability of the intervention and the suitability of the outcome measures and data collection strategy. They will also identify the causes of dropout and obstacles to retention and adherence.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/31646.

摘要

背景

批判性思维是护理教育中必不可少的一组技能,因此护理教育需要更明确地关注支持这些技能发展的有效方法,特别是通过在护理教育中实施技术工具。

目的

本研究方案的目的是评估一种基于元认知理论的技术支持指导模式对临床实习护理学生的可行性。

方法

将采用定量(研究问卷)和定性(焦点小组访谈)方法收集数据,进行一项可行性研究,采用探索性、灵活的混合方法设计,以测试临床实习中一种新开发的干预措施。

结果

干预措施于2020年12月完成开发。该干预措施将在挪威的3家独立养老院进行测试。

结论

通过确定技术支持指导模式对临床实习护理学生的可行性,研究结果将提供有关干预措施可接受性、结果测量和数据收集策略适用性的信息。它们还将确定辍学原因以及留存和坚持的障碍。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/31646

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4c5/8552102/cedfb2e635be/resprot_v10i10e31646_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4c5/8552102/c745ce792a7e/resprot_v10i10e31646_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4c5/8552102/649d51c74ab6/resprot_v10i10e31646_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4c5/8552102/cedfb2e635be/resprot_v10i10e31646_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4c5/8552102/c745ce792a7e/resprot_v10i10e31646_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4c5/8552102/649d51c74ab6/resprot_v10i10e31646_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4c5/8552102/cedfb2e635be/resprot_v10i10e31646_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Technology-Supported Guidance Model to Support the Development of Critical Thinking Among Undergraduate Nursing Students in Clinical Practice: Protocol of an Exploratory, Flexible Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.支持本科护生临床实践中批判性思维发展的技术支持指导模型:一项探索性、灵活混合方法可行性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Oct 13;10(10):e31646. doi: 10.2196/31646.
2
A Technology-Supported Guidance Model to Support the Development of Critical Thinking Among Undergraduate Nursing Students in Clinical Practice: Concurrent, Exploratory, Flexible, and Multimethod Feasibility Study.一种支持本科护理学生在临床实践中培养批判性思维的技术支持指导模型:同步、探索性、灵活且多方法可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 26;7:e43300. doi: 10.2196/43300.
3
Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review.技术支持的指导模型促进临床实践中批判性思维的发展:混合方法系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 19;10(1):e25126. doi: 10.2196/25126.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.技术支持的指导模型促进临床实践中批判性思维的发展:混合方法系统评价
JMIR Nurs. 2022 Jun 7;5(1):e37380. doi: 10.2196/37380.
6
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
7
Analyzing Nursing Students' Relation to Electronic Health and Technology as Individuals and Students and in Their Future Career (the eNursEd Study): Protocol for a Longitudinal Study.分析护理专业学生作为个体、学生以及在其未来职业生涯中与电子健康和技术的关系(eNursEd研究):一项纵向研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Oct 1;8(10):e14643. doi: 10.2196/14643.
8
9
Exploring perceptions and barriers in developing critical thinking and clinical reasoning of nursing students: A qualitative study.探索护理专业学生批判性思维和临床推理培养中的认知与障碍:一项定性研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Dec;95:104600. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104600. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
10
A Technology-Supported Guidance Model to Increase the Flexibility, Quality, and Efficiency of Nursing Education in Clinical Practice in Norway: Development Study of the TOPP-N Application Prototype.一种提高挪威临床实践中护理教育灵活性、质量和效率的技术支持指导模型:TOPP-N应用原型的开发研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Feb 3;10:e44101. doi: 10.2196/44101.

引用本文的文献

1
How to improve interest for undergraduate nursing students working in primary health care.如何提高本科护理学生在基层医疗工作中的兴趣。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2023 May 12;24:e36. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000233.
2
A Technology-Supported Guidance Model to Support the Development of Critical Thinking Among Undergraduate Nursing Students in Clinical Practice: Concurrent, Exploratory, Flexible, and Multimethod Feasibility Study.一种支持本科护理学生在临床实践中培养批判性思维的技术支持指导模型:同步、探索性、灵活且多方法可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 26;7:e43300. doi: 10.2196/43300.

本文引用的文献

1
Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review.技术支持的指导模型促进临床实践中批判性思维的发展:混合方法系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 19;10(1):e25126. doi: 10.2196/25126.
2
The reporting of progression criteria in protocols of pilot trials designed to assess the feasibility of main trials is insufficient: a meta-epidemiological study.旨在评估主要试验可行性的试点试验方案中进展标准的报告不足:一项元流行病学研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Nov 3;5:120. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0500-z. eCollection 2019.
3
Development and psychometric testing of the nursing student mentors' competence instrument (MCI): A cross-sectional study.
护理学生导师能力量表(MCI)的编制与心理测量学测试:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Sep;68:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.028. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
Exploratory studies to decide whether and how to proceed with full-scale evaluations of public health interventions: a systematic review of guidance.关于确定是否以及如何对公共卫生干预措施进行全面评估的探索性研究:指南的系统评价
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 May 28;4:104. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0290-8. eCollection 2018.
5
Effectiveness of mobile cooperation intervention on students' clinical learning outcomes: A randomized controlled trial.移动合作干预对学生临床学习成果的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jun;74(6):1319-1331. doi: 10.1111/jan.13542. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
6
Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes.利用预试验为具有连续结果的干预试验设计提供信息的指南。
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 18;10:153-157. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S146397. eCollection 2018.
7
Describing the participants in a study.描述一项研究中的参与者。
Age Ageing. 2017 Jul 1;46(4):576-581. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx054.
8
Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies.为高效随机对照试验提供信息:探索内部预试验进展标准制定中的挑战。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537.
9
Validation of the tool assessment of clinical education (AssCE): A study using Delphi method and clinical experts.临床教育工具评估(AssCE)的验证:一项采用德尔菲法和临床专家的研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:82-86. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
10
Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework.为随机对照试验做准备时界定可行性研究和预试验:概念框架的构建
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. eCollection 2016.