Roney Caroline H, Child Nicholas, Porter Bradley, Sim Iain, Whitaker John, Clayton Richard H, Laughner Jacob I, Shuros Allan, Neuzil Petr, Williams Steven E, Razavi Reza S, O'Neill Mark, Rinaldi Christopher A, Taggart Peter, Wright Matt, Gill Jaswinder S, Niederer Steven A
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
INSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine and Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Front Physiol. 2021 Sep 27;12:707189. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.707189. eCollection 2021.
Electrical activation during atrial fibrillation (AF) appears chaotic and disorganised, which impedes characterisation of the underlying substrate and treatment planning. While globally chaotic, there may be local preferential activation pathways that represent potential ablation targets. This study aimed to identify preferential activation pathways during AF and predict the acute ablation response when these are targeted by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In patients with persistent AF ( = 14), simultaneous biatrial contact mapping with basket catheters was performed pre-ablation and following each ablation strategy (PVI, roof, and mitral lines). Unipolar wavefront activation directions were averaged over 10 s to identify preferential activation pathways. Clinical cases were classified as responders or non-responders to PVI during the procedure. Clinical data were augmented with a virtual cohort of 100 models. In AF pre-ablation, pathways originated from the pulmonary vein (PV) antra in PVI responders (7/7) but not in PVI non-responders (6/6). We proposed a novel index that measured activation waves from the PV antra into the atrial body. This index was significantly higher in PVI responders than non-responders (clinical: 16.3 vs. 3.7%, = 0.04; simulated: 21.1 vs. 14.1%, = 0.02). Overall, this novel technique and proof of concept study demonstrated that preferential activation pathways exist during AF. Targeting patient-specific activation pathways that flowed from the PV antra to the left atrial body using PVI resulted in AF termination during the procedure. These PV activation flow pathways may correspond to the presence of drivers in the PV regions.
心房颤动(AF)期间的电激活表现出混乱和无序,这阻碍了对潜在基质的特征描述和治疗规划。虽然整体上是混乱的,但可能存在代表潜在消融靶点的局部优先激活途径。本研究旨在识别AF期间的优先激活途径,并预测当通过肺静脉隔离(PVI)靶向这些途径时的急性消融反应。在持续性AF患者(n = 14)中,在消融前以及每种消融策略(PVI、房顶线和二尖瓣线)后,使用篮状导管进行双心房接触式标测。单极波前激活方向在10秒内进行平均,以识别优先激活途径。在手术过程中,临床病例被分类为PVI反应者或无反应者。临床数据通过100个模型的虚拟队列进行扩充。在AF消融前,PVI反应者(7/7)的途径起源于肺静脉(PV)窦,而PVI无反应者(6/6)则不然。我们提出了一种新的指标,用于测量从PV窦进入心房体的激活波。该指标在PVI反应者中显著高于无反应者(临床:16.3%对3.7%,P = 0.04;模拟:21.1%对14.1%,P = 0.02)。总体而言,这项新技术和概念验证研究表明AF期间存在优先激活途径。使用PVI靶向从PV窦流向左心房体的患者特异性激活途径可导致手术过程中AF终止。这些PV激活流途径可能对应于PV区域中驱动因素的存在。