Gristina Valerio, Galvano Antonio, Castellana Luisa, Insalaco Lavinia, Cusenza Stefania, Graceffa Giuseppa, Iacono Federica, Barraco Nadia, Castiglia Marta, Perez Alessandro, Rizzo Sergio, Russo Antonio, Bazan Viviana
Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Division of General and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Jul 21;13:17588359211018018. doi: 10.1177/17588359211018018. eCollection 2021.
The addition of PD-L1 inhibitors to platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) has newly received United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in extensive stage-small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). PD-1 agents similarly improved survival rates, even if not yet supported by international regulatory agencies. The current work aims to assess different efficacy and safety profiles among chemoimmunotherapy plus immuno-oncology (CT+IO) approaches according to different immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) subtypes.
MATERIAL & METHODS: We included in our meta-analysis six first-line randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the association of single-agent ICI with CT CT alone in ES-SCLC. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORR), 12-month duration of response rate (DORR), disease control rate (DCR), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and discontinuation rates (DRs) were obtained. Moreover, we performed indirect comparisons according to ICI subtypes, also among subgroups and landmark survival analyses.
Although no ORR benefit was observed, our results showed how CT+IO significantly improved DORR, resulting in improved PFS and OS with no differences in TRAEs; however, CT+IO led to a significant increase in DR. Interestingly, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 1, the use of cisplatin, and the absence of brain metastases seem to be associated with a survival gain using CT+IO in ES-SCLC. Indirect comparisons suggested a slight advantage in favour of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) over anti-CTLA-4 agents in terms of efficacy with no additional safety concerns. No further differences were observed between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors among subgroups and landmark survival analyses with benefit trends towards anti-PD-1 in terms of DORR and DR.
While confirming a survival advantage of CT+IO in selected patients, these results suggested the association of PD-1 inhibitors with CT as a viable option for novel therapeutic approaches in the frontline management of ES-SCLC. Further trials evaluating anti-CTLA-4 agents should be carefully studied in biomarker-selected patients.
在广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)中,将程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂添加到铂类化疗(CT)中最近已获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准。程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)药物同样提高了生存率,即使尚未得到国际监管机构的支持。目前的研究旨在根据不同的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)亚型评估化疗免疫疗法联合免疫肿瘤学(CT+IO)方法之间不同的疗效和安全性。
我们将六项一线随机对照试验(RCT)纳入荟萃分析,这些试验比较了ES-SCLC中单药ICI与单纯CT的联合应用。获得了无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、12个月缓解持续率(DORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)和停药率(DRs)的合并风险比(HRs)和风险比(RRs)。此外,我们还根据ICI亚型进行了间接比较,包括亚组间比较和里程碑生存分析。
尽管未观察到ORR获益,但我们的结果显示CT+IO显著提高了DORR,从而改善了PFS和OS,且TRAEs无差异;然而,CT+IO导致DR显著增加。有趣的是,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)为1、使用顺铂以及无脑转移似乎与ES-SCLC中使用CT+IO的生存获益相关。间接比较表明,在疗效方面,程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)和程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)相对于抗细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关蛋白4(CTLA-4)药物略有优势,且无额外的安全问题。在亚组和里程碑生存分析中,未观察到PD-1和PD-L1抑制剂之间的进一步差异,在DORR和DR方面,抗PD-1有获益趋势。
虽然证实了CT+IO在特定患者中的生存优势,但这些结果表明,PD-1抑制剂与CT联合应用是ES-SCLC一线治疗新的可行选择。应在生物标志物选择的患者中仔细研究评估抗CTLA-4药物的进一步试验。